The "Sh*t Driving Caught On Cam" Thread (Vol 4)

The "Sh*t Driving Caught On Cam" Thread (Vol 4)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

LosingGrip

7,829 posts

160 months

Monday 10th December 2018
quotequote all
maccas99 said:
Blatantly on the phone as distracted and weaving all over the place, terrible road positioning for the right turn.
Yeah. What you can't see in the video that clearly, and it may be before I clipped it, is they are leaning across to the glove box a fair bit.

sheffphil

3 posts

137 months

Monday 10th December 2018
quotequote all

kev1974

4,029 posts

130 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
sheffphil said:
Sh*t drift fail (not my vid)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgGvXzBpeuw
knob factor 100 on his number plate as well

The Moose

22,867 posts

210 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
cjs racing. said:
on that 1 driver that needs shocking to slow down.
I don’t see that at all. To me, it says the parent should manage their kids better around roads.

I was amazed how well he bounced!

blueg33

36,019 posts

225 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
Vipers said:
Dromedary66 said:
Don Roque said:
If you think that video needs a warning you need to give yourself a shake and remind yourself of the potential consequences of your driving. This modern day desire for absolute insulation from anything mildly uncomfortable or unexpected is shameful.
Well said.
If it had been Dianne Abbot in a bikini, that would need a warning laugh
Even the thought of that needs a warning! You have ruined my breakfast and possibly my day.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
RogerDodger said:
NorfolkInClue1 said:
FFS, here we have all that is wrong with the world in 2018, truly pathetic.....

So you two are unable to read the statement that goes with the video, in which any simpleton would deduce that a child will be involved with a car, there are several pointers in the text.....but no, you two either didn’t bother to read it before you impatiently clicked the video, or did read it and are terminally stupid.
So you’re clearly happy and very eager to click play and see cars crash with people in them who could have been hurt, but it’s a child instead so you’re suddenly upset?
fking pathetic.......”I didn’t want to see that”.......”I wasn’t expecting a child to get hit”....grow up a bit you couple of snowflakes, if not then stay away from topics that might just upset your delicate dispositions....
fk off you arogant tt. When I watch videos linked from a forum I don't read the description on the Youtube section. I'm usually watching the video..

Watching hapless adults crash their cars is generally amusing, watching a someone's child nearly get killed is not. I dont' have kids. I don't want to watch anyone , adults or kids, being kit by a car and knocked across the road.
As you're obviously so sensitive (but still happy to hurl insults around) perhaps you should read the description before watching and then you can make up your own mind rather than expecting someone else to do it for you which sadly is a scourge of modern society. Take responsibility for your own actions FFS!

Limpet

6,324 posts

162 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
I hit a young kid (6-7 years old) when I was driving to work at 18. It's the most sickening feeling I've ever experienced to this date. He ran out from between two parked cars. I was going uphill and about 20 mph, which really helped with the stopping distance, but I knocked him over (not flying, like in the clip, thankfully). He got up and ran away.

There was nobody else about, and no sign of the parents, so I carried on driving to work and called the local police station to report it. To be honest, the police were brilliant. They were remarkably relaxed about it once I told them he'd run off, but they said I'd done the right thing reporting it, and to pop in to the station later in the day, and they'd take some details to put on file just in case anything were to come of it. I went down there in my lunch hour, and was told nothing had been reported to them, and basically not to worry too much about it, and it had probably taught the kid a valuable lesson. A copper came out and had quick walk around the car. There was no damage on it, and they took a few details and said they'd call me if they needed anything else. I never heard any more.

Whether it's your fault or not, it's the most awful, sickening feeling. It was 25 years ago, and I still remember it clearly.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

256 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
jamei303 said:
Actually on looking at it carefully I'm not convinced the Audi driver would have seen the child at all.
Perhaps Audi drivers naturally swerve around when they haven't seen anything, but it looked more like he reacted to seeing something.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

256 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
RogerDodger said:
fk off you arogant tt. When I watch videos linked from a forum I don't read the description on the Youtube section. I'm usually watching the video..
.
So you are easily upset, but at the same time will happily watch videos from random links without bothering to read the description and instead expect other people to shield you from the nastiness? I thought Norfolks reply was a pretty harsh at first, now I agree with him.

jamei303

3,005 posts

157 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
If people are deeply traumatised by watching that clip I wonder how they would react to something similar happening when they are driving. Probably best that they surrender their licenses.

This sort of thing should be compulsory viewing in the theory test, especially for those taking the extended retest after a ban.

Vipers

32,904 posts

229 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
FreeLitres said:
JuanGandini said:
Apologies for the non-PH source, but I just saw this link on Twitter http://fal.cn/ruyD
Posted very recently (phone user crashes shortly after getting told off by cyclist)
Fantastic. In stop start traffic a young woman behind me was on the phone everytime we stopped, looking down, eventually I got out, knocked on her window, and told her politely I didnt cherish the thought of her rear ending my car becuase she was engrossed on the bloody phone, she sheeplishy put it away. Some will never learn. I hope the cyclist vid helped to prosecute that woman.

Vipers

32,904 posts

229 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
Russian Troll Bot said:
Vipers said:
Dromedary66 said:
Don Roque said:
If you think that video needs a warning you need to give yourself a shake and remind yourself of the potential consequences of your driving. This modern day desire for absolute insulation from anything mildly uncomfortable or unexpected is shameful.
Well said.
If it had been Dianne Abbot in a bikini, that would need a warning laugh
That would have to have been one hell of an impact to get her airborne
laugh

karona

1,918 posts

187 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
Perhaps Audi drivers naturally swerve around when they haven't seen anything, but it looked more like he reacted to seeing something.
Perhaps he could have reacted to other clues, like the zigzag lines.
https://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk/answers/what-do-th...

"You must not overtake the leading vehicle"

LosingGrip

7,829 posts

160 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
karona said:
Perhaps he could have reacted to other clues, like the zigzag lines.
https://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk/answers/what-do-th...

"You must not overtake the leading vehicle"
I was under the impression that was if it was a single lane such as the photo on that website and not two lanes?

jamei303

3,005 posts

157 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/2400/regul...

The law is quite clear. In this case the camera car was neither approaching the crossing nor stopped for the specified purposes. Also the Audi was not within a controlled area when it passed the foremost part of the camera car.

mac96

3,802 posts

144 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
karona said:
Mr2Mike said:
Perhaps Audi drivers naturally swerve around when they haven't seen anything, but it looked more like he reacted to seeing something.
Perhaps he could have reacted to other clues, like the zigzag lines.
https://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk/answers/what-do-th...

"You must not overtake the leading vehicle"
Did he though? Surely he only shot into view because cam car braked so hard?

WCZ

10,544 posts

195 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
sheffphil said:
Sh*t drift fail (not my vid)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgGvXzBpeuw
hahaha

Vipers

32,904 posts

229 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
WCZ said:
sheffphil said:
Sh*t drift fail (not my vid)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgGvXzBpeuw
hahaha
I often wonder if they practice their verbal responses, well thought out that one biggrin

Frimley111R

15,686 posts

235 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
Don Roque said:
If you think that video needs a warning you need to give yourself a shake and remind yourself of the potential consequences of your driving. This modern day desire for absolute insulation from anything mildly uncomfortable or unexpected is shameful.
+1

karona

1,918 posts

187 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
jamei303 said:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/2400/regul...

The law is quite clear. In this case the camera car was neither approaching the crossing nor stopped for the specified purposes. Also the Audi was not within a controlled area when it passed the foremost part of the camera car.
Are we talking about different clips? The camera car stopped because a child was on the crossing, as the child bounced off the bonnet the zigzags clearly continue beyond the crossing. The controlled area clearly encompasses the entire crossing and the road beyond. An overtaking car appears to the right, clearly unaware of anyone using the crossing, unsighted by the camera car. This, surely, is the whole point of the regulations covering the overtaking of the leading car on zigzag lines?

Would a competent driver really overtake that quickly on a pedestrian crossing of any variety, without being absolutely certain the crossing was clear?

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED