Are these Vloggers just a scam? SOL or Shmee etc? (Vol 2)

Are these Vloggers just a scam? SOL or Shmee etc? (Vol 2)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

jas xjr

11,309 posts

240 months

Wednesday 18th July 2018
quotequote all
jon- said:
Piper was claiming Hales miss-shifted down and over revved the engine causing the damage. Hales claimed he didn't miss-shift and the car just broke.

Very different from the E60 case where you literally can't do anything to damage the SMG gearbox, it just lunched itself. If I was the owner of the car and a friend was driving it, I would have taken it on the chin too, it would have gone regardless.
A friend of mine had a pagoda roof Mercedes sl. He was very busy and repeatedly asked if i would like to use it for a weekend. I was fairly busy too but thought i might have a weekend away somewhere with my wife. Before i could take up the offer , the car had something terminal happen to the engine. Had i been driving it at the time, i would have felt responsible. I i have not borrowed a car since. Despite many offers to do so from friends and family

lemmingjames

7,460 posts

205 months

Wednesday 18th July 2018
quotequote all
jon- said:
Piper was claiming Hales miss-shifted down and over revved the engine causing the damage. Hales claimed he didn't miss-shift and the car just broke.

Very different from the E60 case where you literally can't do anything to damage the SMG gearbox, it just lunched itself. If I was the owner of the car and a friend was driving it, I would have taken it on the chin too, it would have gone regardless.
Does that include holding it in gear at a high revs? On that LLF video, 'LLF' said he liked to leave it in manual shift instead of auto and i would assume he kept it in the upper reaches for longer.

Or are the SMG's just abit weak and meant to be left in auto?

emicen

8,590 posts

219 months

Wednesday 18th July 2018
quotequote all
lemmingjames said:
jon- said:
Piper was claiming Hales miss-shifted down and over revved the engine causing the damage. Hales claimed he didn't miss-shift and the car just broke.

Very different from the E60 case where you literally can't do anything to damage the SMG gearbox, it just lunched itself. If I was the owner of the car and a friend was driving it, I would have taken it on the chin too, it would have gone regardless.
Does that include holding it in gear at a high revs? On that LLF video, 'LLF' said he liked to leave it in manual shift instead of auto and i would assume he kept it in the upper reaches for longer.

Or are the SMG's just abit weak and meant to be left in auto?
The video features a whole load of point and squirt style kicking the car’s hoop.

Relatively short, hard acceleration runs. All high throttle opening, all high revs. Broken up by traffic, junctions and roundabouts. Not a whole lot of opportunity for a gearbox, getting 50% more power and a whole load more torque than standard put through it, to cool it’s fluid.

Owner stated he hadn’t touched the gearbox.

Not making excuses for the guy driving, but it’s not a massively surprising failure all things considered.

Escy

3,940 posts

150 months

Wednesday 18th July 2018
quotequote all
Why would holding it in gear longer make a difference?

djdest

6,542 posts

179 months

Wednesday 18th July 2018
quotequote all
He doesn’t exactly come across as someone who would be mechanically sympathetic

Escy

3,940 posts

150 months

Wednesday 18th July 2018
quotequote all
Perhaps not but you couldn't break an SMG gearbox on purpose if you tried.

TheAngryDog

12,409 posts

210 months

Wednesday 18th July 2018
quotequote all
The SMG box isn't as weak as the internet would have you believe it is. My morals wouldn't allow me to just walk away from a car if it broke while I was driving it. There is no guarantee that the failure would have happened when the owner was driving it. I think if nothing else, an offer (which I am sure would have been turned down by the owner) to contribute wouldn't have gone amiss.

TheAngryDog

12,409 posts

210 months

Wednesday 18th July 2018
quotequote all
emicen said:
ashleyman said:
TheAngryDog said:
What in the name of all fkwittery fkwits is this st?

https://youtu.be/H2KOUXMmhGE

How in the name of fk did they get 3.7m subscribers? They must all be fking sad s who subscribe to this st.
This guy has been around for years. He started by pranking his brother and posting the videos on Facebook.
  • Fake pranking* his brother.
It’s boggles the mind but people lap this st up, like the bloke with the girlfriend who was meant to be dumb as a box of rocks.

There’s YouTube channels out there with 60k views of 20mins clothes shopping for their dad. It really makes you wonder just how unhappy in life a lot of the world is to find a 20min segment of someone else’s life, doing something utterly boring, to be worth watching.
The mind boggles. You could almost say the same for any vlog type content, but actually some are interesting (I've changed my tact from Vol 1 when I was critical of vloggers in general). Some of my issues remain though, in that living vicariously through a vlogger is somewhat sad.

jon-

16,511 posts

217 months

Wednesday 18th July 2018
quotequote all
TheAngryDog said:
The SMG box isn't as weak as the internet would have you believe it is. My morals wouldn't allow me to just walk away from a car if it broke while I was driving it. There is no guarantee that the failure would have happened when the owner was driving it. I think if nothing else, an offer (which I am sure would have been turned down by the owner) to contribute wouldn't have gone amiss.
If you rang your friends doorbell and a wiring issue caused his house to burn down, would you offer to pay for the house?


Beefmeister

16,482 posts

231 months

Wednesday 18th July 2018
quotequote all
jon- said:
If you rang your friends doorbell and a wiring issue caused his house to burn down, would you offer to pay for the house?
And the doorbell was hotwired to make it ring louder and longer than before....

E36Dan

7,543 posts

169 months

Wednesday 18th July 2018
quotequote all
No way is LLF responsible for the gearbox failure. As many have said, the SMG is computer controlled. Obviously driving enthusiastically with increased output from the engine will add to the stress on the components, but I don't feel he should be guilt tripped into being involved with the repairs.

We had this discussion a few months ago and the Porsche incident was brought forward. It's a worry for sure.

Burwood

18,709 posts

247 months

Wednesday 18th July 2018
quotequote all
jon- said:
TheAngryDog said:
The SMG box isn't as weak as the internet would have you believe it is. My morals wouldn't allow me to just walk away from a car if it broke while I was driving it. There is no guarantee that the failure would have happened when the owner was driving it. I think if nothing else, an offer (which I am sure would have been turned down by the owner) to contribute wouldn't have gone amiss.
If you rang your friends doorbell and a wiring issue caused his house to burn down, would you offer to pay for the house?
Doorbells, wtf. How about if you video’d the house burning and you got paid 3k from youtube hits. Wouldn’t it seem reasonable to offer the owner the 3k?

e30m3Mark

16,205 posts

174 months

Wednesday 18th July 2018
quotequote all
If you going to loan a car for review you need to take responsibility for it when things go wrong. Unless it's deliberate or intentionally negligent obviously. Mind you, the question of responsibility is one that needs to be asked prior to the event, not after.

fridaypassion

8,568 posts

229 months

Wednesday 18th July 2018
quotequote all
camshafted said:
It's a slightly different level/scenario but around five years ago David Piper sued journalist and racing driver Mark Hales after the engine of the Porsche he was driving on track for a feature suffered serious damage. I think Piper won - it was a low six-figure case. "You bend it you mend it" were Piper's words I believe.
I thought of this when reading the earlier posts. You are 100% correct Mark Hales was successfully sued for this. I thought it was a tremendoudly ungentlemanly action on behalf of the car's owner that was landed gentry Vs Mark Hales = not a wealthy man. Who knows how they handled eachother though? Still food for thought as I would be amazed if any of the choobers (other than Shmee) have full proper insurance for driving other peoples cars in a journalistic capacity. I pay £3500 as a trader so you can double that for hooning about in lambos. Jurno's have a horrific track record for smashing stuff up!

smokeey

1,541 posts

173 months

Thursday 19th July 2018
quotequote all
fridaypassion said:
camshafted said:
It's a slightly different level/scenario but around five years ago David Piper sued journalist and racing driver Mark Hales after the engine of the Porsche he was driving on track for a feature suffered serious damage. I think Piper won - it was a low six-figure case. "You bend it you mend it" were Piper's words I believe.
I thought of this when reading the earlier posts. You are 100% correct Mark Hales was successfully sued for this. I thought it was a tremendoudly ungentlemanly action on behalf of the car's owner that was landed gentry Vs Mark Hales = not a wealthy man. Who knows how they handled eachother though? Still food for thought as I would be amazed if any of the choobers (other than Shmee) have full proper insurance for driving other peoples cars in a journalistic capacity. I pay £3500 as a trader so you can double that for hooning about in lambos. Jurno's have a horrific track record for smashing stuff up!
Wasn’t it shown that Hales had over revved the Porsche on a downshift and that had caused the engine failure?
It wasn’t just a mechanical failure, if it had been then Hales wouldn’t have been liable. IIRC, Hales admitted he was at fault but when he tried to claim from his insurance they wouldn’t pay out because it was driver error.

Driver error - Vlogger pays
Mechanical failure - owner pays

playalistic

2,269 posts

165 months

Thursday 19th July 2018
quotequote all
If I remember correctly, throughout the proceedings Piper was insistent on bankrupting Hales, even after the necessary funds for repair had been raised. It seemed particularly vindictive to me, but I assume we weren't furnished with the full facts.

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 19th July 2018
quotequote all
smokeey said:
fridaypassion said:
camshafted said:
It's a slightly different level/scenario but around five years ago David Piper sued journalist and racing driver Mark Hales after the engine of the Porsche he was driving on track for a feature suffered serious damage. I think Piper won - it was a low six-figure case. "You bend it you mend it" were Piper's words I believe.
I thought of this when reading the earlier posts. You are 100% correct Mark Hales was successfully sued for this. I thought it was a tremendoudly ungentlemanly action on behalf of the car's owner that was landed gentry Vs Mark Hales = not a wealthy man. Who knows how they handled eachother though? Still food for thought as I would be amazed if any of the choobers (other than Shmee) have full proper insurance for driving other peoples cars in a journalistic capacity. I pay £3500 as a trader so you can double that for hooning about in lambos. Jurno's have a horrific track record for smashing stuff up!
Wasn’t it shown that Hales had over revved the Porsche on a downshift and that had caused the engine failure?
It wasn’t just a mechanical failure, if it had been then Hales wouldn’t have been liable. IIRC, Hales admitted he was at fault but when he tried to claim from his insurance they wouldn’t pay out because it was driver error.

Driver error - Vlogger pays
Mechanical failure - owner pays
I don´t believe any car is so fragile that it needs a rebuild after one little mistake. To me, this is just scumbag behaviour making someone else pay for repairs and then selling it on as "recently rebuild".

ReaperCushions

6,031 posts

185 months

Thursday 19th July 2018
quotequote all
Back to the FOS coverage recently. I must admit that I thought SOL and Sam did a decent job on their build-up videos (this Michelin and Shell thing) but my word their coverage of the actual event was very poor compared to others (Our mate Shmee in particular).

I realize the effort required, but Tim pumping out 4/5/6 videos over the course of the 3 days is perfect for the level of detail I like. I think one thing that Tim has really mastered is the art of getting as many videos as possible out of one event/item, without it being tedious.
Why do 1 FOS video when you can do one of each car you run up the hill in, along with a run around the carpark and review of the paddock area. 2 day event = 6 days worth of content.




red_slr

17,254 posts

190 months

Thursday 19th July 2018
quotequote all
SOL uploaded a video to say his new R8 is an Audi UK G&F car. Cant fault him for pulling that off!!

red_slr

17,254 posts

190 months

Thursday 19th July 2018
quotequote all
Oh and he broke the gearbox already biggrin

(Donuts were not the cause.. honest guv)
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED