RE: Shed of the Week: Rover Metro

RE: Shed of the Week: Rover Metro

Author
Discussion

r11co

6,244 posts

231 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
muckyman said:
Crap description in advert.
Crap photos in advert.
Crap car.(imho)
Crap post.

PS. The seller is reading and has contributed to the thread. I hope he takes the appropriate action in response to the above.

rolleyes

ACB85

82 posts

95 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Well this particular vintage of Metro was a friends first car back in 2002. Driving 4 of us back from the cinema, he did hoon around the Isle of Wight like it was a racing circuit. Decided he was going too fast for an off camber right hander.

Problem was, he decided to slow down mid corner. We spun 180 across the oncoming traffic hit a large curb, just before a vast newly erected street light, rolled over 3 times into the ditch beside the road.

All parties escaped through the passenger door. Car was chucking out quite a lot of smoke. Roof was caved in a bit and all the glass was gone. Quite amazing such a sh*t box wasn't as flat as a pancake.

S100HP

12,687 posts

168 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Piginapoke said:
Tebbers said:
Lynn, I’m not driving a Mini Metro.
I just spat my coffee out at that
No you didn't

Dale487

1,334 posts

124 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
GTEYE said:


Different times undoubtedly, but not all cars were as bad as the Metro



A contemporary Polo

Edited by GTEYE on Friday 27th April 11:51
When a car makes a 106/Saxo look like a good option to have a crash in, you know its bad - I think it might be safer to take off your seat belt, open the window & try to jump free of a Metro in a crash.

Steve_F

860 posts

195 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
A mate at uni had a GTA, first time I saw it I was wondering why on earth anyone had stuck a body kit on it. First trip in it I had a smile plastered all over my face. It was great fun. He never, ever drove it slowly and it always hung on to the exact lines he wanted. Definite surprise how good it was.

Wouldn't ever contemplate buying this one though!

Jack4688

78 posts

154 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Just so you know, SHED, the phrase is Aris’ not Harris. It’s a bit of long winded rhyming slang that takes you from Aristotle to glass bottle (glass pronounced ‘glarse’) and then you drop the g and l....

Source: Roger’s profanisaurus

V8 FOU

2,977 posts

148 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all

Steve_W

1,496 posts

178 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
LOL - 1 way to guarantee many hits/posts is to stick a Metro in it!

I've still got my Mk1 MG Metro sitting in a shed waiting its turn to get welded back together - hopefully I'll get to it before it totally dissolves!

We had loads as a family - sister had a 1.0L, my MG, and mum went through a 1.3HLS, 1.3 VP, then the Rover 1.1S and 1.4. Obviously, we're all dead now smile

Sure, in this day & age, they're so far off modern crash standards as to be a joke, but at the time we had them they were great fun, especially round the lanes of Somerset - on a motorway, not so much fun.

It'll be a shame if all the old ordinary cars disappear - hopefully someone will keep this one as a fun little classic for pottering to shows in now 7 then. Either that or it'll get used as the base for a Talon style VVC conversion.

OP - hope things go well for your mum, and the car goes to a good home.

Ian_C

193 posts

211 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
So the last three Sheds have been:

a P38 Range Rover (one of the most unreliable cars ever made)
a 13 year old Laguna Mk 2 (THE most unreliable car ever made)
a 24 year old Rover Metro 1.1 for £1500

Riiiiiiiight....

AJB

856 posts

216 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
MJ85 said:
My mum had a Rio Grande. Not sure on the difference between a Rio and a Rio Grande. Anyone?
Rio Grande had painted bumpers rather than black plastic and a sunroof. I can't remember if it also had remote locking or anything else extra.

Shakermaker

11,317 posts

101 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
GTEYE said:


Different times undoubtedly, but not all cars were as bad as the Metro



A contemporary Polo

Edited by GTEYE on Friday 27th April 11:51
A car designed in the 1970s and launched in 1980 performs worse in a crash than a car launched in what, 1994? That doesn't really prove anything. The Metro met all the relevant safety standards for when it was launched, but by the end of its lifespan it was beaten by newer cars designed to newer more stringent standards?

J4CKO

41,637 posts

201 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
GTEYE said:


Different times undoubtedly, but not all cars were as bad as the Metro



A contemporary Polo

Edited by GTEYE on Friday 27th April 11:51
That Polo was produced as the Metro came to the end of its (over extended) run, the Metro was more a contemporary of the mk1 and 2 Polos rather than the mk3, I had a mk2 Polo, possibly a bit sturdier than a Metro but in a crash, can’t imagine it would make much odds to the outcome, both are so far behind modern standards you would end up badly hurt in an incident that in say a modern Polo, you would just be a bit shook up and deaf for a bit from the airbags.


Dave Hedgehog

14,569 posts

205 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Dale487 said:
When a car makes a 106/Saxo look like a good option to have a crash in, you know its bad - I think it might be safer to take off your seat belt, open the window & try to jump free of a Metro in a crash.
If i recall they stopped selling them straight after the original NCAP test showed how dangerous they where

DailyHack

3,191 posts

112 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
I dont mind these - probably having a "rose tinted spectacle" moment, my dad had a sky blue/rusty one, but it was the earlier Austin version...

Remember as a kid the sticky vinyl/leatherette seats, got that smell in my mind now.

We use to drive down to the local chippy, and my dad use to drive the metro with his knees down the quiet road....remember he also used it for work, and he left his suit shoes on the roof...and forgot them...first corner he encountered, yep, their they were on the verge! Priceless memories.

Anyways, its a crap car and rather un-safe nowadays, buts it is good seeing these little workhorses of the 80s/90s still about - my 1960s Beetle is probably safer in a crash, and that says alot about the Metro design!

Steve_W

1,496 posts

178 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
For anyone with a bit of spare time here's a Metro thread for you.

Guy on RetroRides bought a VVC converted Rover Metro and decided it would look better as a Mk1 Metro van:

http://forum.retro-rides.org/thread/195759/1993-ro...

KP328

1,812 posts

196 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
After several years of my parents owning Alfa Romeo's I finally turned 17 and looked forward to learning to drive in an Alfa.

It was at that point they sold the Alfa and bought a Metro, being a shallow teenager and only thinking about my 'street cred' i was a bit gutted, but looking back practicing driving in the Metro did help me pass my test.

RM

593 posts

98 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
r11co said:
RM said:
Yes, but the metro was in the unfortunate position of having been in production for 17 odd years, and still in production, by the time NCAP arrived. Most other 70s designed cars were out of production by 97. Plus the metro had it roots in an early 70s design.
The Citroen Saxo was based on a 1970's design (the Citroen LNA/Peugeot 104) and was effectively a facelift of a facelift (the intervening car being the AX) and suffered similarly poor levels of crash protection, but that wasn't one of the first things mentioned the last two times a VTR/VTS was the shed.
Yes, and yet the Saxo still managed to get 2 stars, to the metro's (Rover 100) 1 star - and that was the version with airbags. The Saxo didn't get any poor ratings for occupant protection body parts, but the metro received poor for head, thighs, feet, and chest. The A pillar moved back 500mm and the steering wheel 300mm!

Same with most 70s cars, as we have both said, but it was just unfortunate that the metro was tested, and the only one in 1997 to get only 1 star.

youngsod

268 posts

183 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
It certainly seems much better value than this:

http://www.eastlancashireclassics.com/vehicle.php?...

£2995 for a Rover 100 Knightsbridge!

tannhauser

1,773 posts

216 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
r11co said:
The rust is on the striker reinforcement plate - purely cosmetic. You could take that off, rub it down and spray it to tidy it up in less than one hour.

This choice was always going to trigger an irrational bout of negativity from people who would overlook bigger problems on different marques.
Indeed. You'd find that on most cars after 4/5 years! This is a 24yo Metro FFS! rolleyes

ETA: I'm actually quite liking this one! Not that I'd pay £1.5k for one, though I wonder if they will appreciate in time?!


GrumpyV8

138 posts

155 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
V8 FOU said:
Good luck with insurance and getting V5 details changed....!