RE: Panavia Tornado F3: Spotted

RE: Panavia Tornado F3: Spotted

Author
Discussion

Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

159 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2018
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
It also guzzled fuel at a terrific rate at altitude as well, which meant, trying to get one to FL50 when clean even after topping up from a tanker meant you really didn't have enough fuel to hope to get to M2.2.....

I have talked to one ex.F.3 pilot that claimed to have seen M1.8 at FL43...once........ and he reckoned that was an achievement..... biggrin
FL50= 5,000 feet.

FL43= 4,300 feet.

These are not spectacularly high altitudes.

Edited by Rovinghawk on Tuesday 22 May 22:30

mr pg

1,954 posts

206 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2018
quotequote all
frodo_monkey said:
4x AMRAAM or Skyflash under fuselage, 4x ASRAAM or ‘winders under wing. At the same time you could carry 2x drop tanks (large or small) and also a towed radar decoy/chaff pod on the outer stubs.

And it could do Mach 2+, I have done it (Falklands, dedicated tanker)...

Edited by frodo_monkey on Tuesday 22 May 17:28
I was part of the design team that converted the BOZ chaff pod into the towed decoy version as an urgent operational requirement. Helped protect the F3's, but did little to help its performance. The outer wing pylons were only fitted when this UOR came out.

Jonesy23

4,650 posts

137 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2018
quotequote all
On the upside that one is mostly complete so a good display item if you've got somewhere sheltered to keep it.

No idea what that will go for but last F3 I got near cost a whole £1 to buy - used it for parts. The market isn't exactly huge for these things.

kuro

1,621 posts

120 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2018
quotequote all
I got to go into Marham through my work some years ago. Was out on the airfield with these taking off at regular intervals, a brilliant experience. The most surreal thing was while driving out of the base around the perimeter we had to stop at red lights to let one taxi down to the runway.

MadDog1962

891 posts

163 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2018
quotequote all
Hopefully a few of these will be preserved.

It's still a wonderful aircraft. It's amazing to think these fist entered service in 1979.

I still vividly remember seeing (and hearing!) one break the sound barrier at the end of the airshow at RAF Saint Athan back in 1981.

myhandle

1,194 posts

175 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2018
quotequote all
Thread of the year! Long live The Fin!

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2018
quotequote all
McGraw said:
Much prefer the dogfighting performance of the similar era F16.

The rear wing looks wrong on these too.
Do you mean "tailplane" or "horizontal stabilizer"?

The tailplane on the Tornado is interesting. Most aeroplanes use wing mounted ailerons for roll control. Because the Tornado has swing wings, it does not have wing mounted ailerons. Instead, roll control is effected by differential movement of the tailplanes. Pitch control is by operating the tailplanes in unison.


Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2018
quotequote all
MadDog1962 said:
Hopefully a few of these will be preserved.

It's still a wonderful aircraft. It's amazing to think these fist entered service in 1979.

I still vividly remember seeing (and hearing!) one break the sound barrier at the end of the airshow at RAF Saint Athan back in 1981.
Not the F3 version. They entered service in 1984/85 following initial use of the rather less than capable interim F2.

Amanitin

423 posts

138 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2018
quotequote all
Rovinghawk said:
FL50= 5,000 feet.

FL43= 4,300 feet.

These are not spectacularly high altitudes.

Edited by Rovinghawk on Tuesday 22 May 22:30
that's 50,000 and 43,000 sir, and while maybe not spectacular they do qualify as pretty damn high. Not many aircraft can cruise at FL50.

z06tim

558 posts

187 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2018
quotequote all
frodo_monkey said:
4x AMRAAM or Skyflash under fuselage, 4x ASRAAM or ‘winders under wing. At the same time you could carry 2x drop tanks (large or small) and also a towed radar decoy/chaff pod on the outer stubs.

And it could do Mach 2+, I have done it (Falklands, dedicated tanker)...

Edited by frodo_monkey on Tuesday 22 May 17:28
You must know Dave Gledhill then?

I went to a fantastic presentation of his that included in cockpit video from his time as Nav on Tornado F3s in the Falklands.

He was also on Phantoms before, and he's written a few books on this and other subjects.

pSyCoSiS

3,601 posts

206 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2018
quotequote all
That's a cool, proper 'big boy's toy'.

Proper engineering.

Anyone know the price, just out of interest?

Madness60

571 posts

185 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2018
quotequote all
Amanitin said:
Rovinghawk said:
FL50= 5,000 feet.

FL43= 4,300 feet.

These are not spectacularly high altitudes.

Edited by Rovinghawk on Tuesday 22 May 22:30
that's 50,000 and 43,000 sir, and while maybe not spectacular they do qualify as pretty damn high. Not many aircraft can cruise at FL50.
Errrr nope, FL50 is 5000 feet, FL500 is 50000' which would be impressive for an F3.

F3 always used to lose the 'brakes off to 10000' challenge' vs an unladen Chinook in the Falklands!

frodo_monkey

670 posts

197 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2018
quotequote all
Amanitin said:
that's 50,000 and 43,000 sir, and while maybe not spectacular they do qualify as pretty damn high. Not many aircraft can cruise at FL50.
Nope, FL500 is fifty thousand feet etc... FL43 is 4300’.

frodo_monkey

670 posts

197 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2018
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Do you mean "tailplane" or "horizontal stabilizer"?

The tailplane on the Tornado is interesting. Most aeroplanes use wing mounted ailerons for roll control. Because the Tornado has swing wings, it does not have wing mounted ailerons. Instead, roll control is effected by differential movement of the tailplanes. Pitch control is by operating the tailplanes in unison.
The ‘tailplanes’ are technically called tailerons for exactly that reason.

frodo_monkey

670 posts

197 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2018
quotequote all
z06tim said:
You must know Dave Gledhill then?

I went to a fantastic presentation of his that included in cockpit video from his time as Nav on Tornado F3s in the Falklands.

He was also on Phantoms before, and he's written a few books on this and other subjects.
I’ve read his books and am aware of him, but he’d left the jet before I arrived on it in 2004.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2018
quotequote all
This is a blast from the past! I worked on the F3 OCU at Conningsby from 87 to 97 as a radar tech. Pretty sure ZE256 was originally on the OCU (it's a twin sticker too), so I would have spent some late nights/early mornings fixing it!

dumfriesdave

384 posts

138 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2018
quotequote all
GIYess said:
comments are comedy gold. biglaugh Love it. I'm sitting here thinking about where in my yard it could sit! Imagine the kids faces when the lorry rolled up with that on the back!
Anything like this perhaps ?
Seen weekly when at work.




Wildcat45

8,076 posts

190 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2018
quotequote all
This has the Blue Circle radar, right?

Actually this makes me feel very old. As a kid in 1981 my mates Dad was in the RAF, based at Cottesmore. He took us there to see their brand new GR1s.

The F3 was a good looking jet.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2018
quotequote all
Wildcat45 said:
This has the Blue Circle radar, right?

Actually this makes me feel very old. As a kid in 1981 my mates Dad was in the RAF, based at Cottesmore. He took us there to see their brand new GR1s.

The F3 was a good looking jet.
In the early F2/F3 days there were not enough AI24 radar packs to go round. So quite a few jets had the ballast fitted, it was actually metal not concrete. Lots of fun was had on night shift removing radar packs from a jet that had gone unserviceable and stuffing it into one that had no radar fitted.

soad

32,909 posts

177 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2018
quotequote all
No engine?! Forget about it.