RE: Cayman GTS v Exige Sport 410 v Audi TT RS

RE: Cayman GTS v Exige Sport 410 v Audi TT RS

Author
Discussion

krisdelta

4,566 posts

202 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
Shiv_P said:
90k car vs 50k car

Next week on PH 5 reasons why the Mercedes E63S wagon is a better family car than a kia picanto
Quite, all interesting cars their own right, but baffling to compare. And £100k for an Exige - jeeeesus!

CABC

5,589 posts

102 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
DeltonaS said:
This article seems to be totally written by the PR department at Hethel.
He doesn't work weekends.


PS why so touchy on the Audi? the article seems fair.

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

235 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
DeltonaS said:
Another strange thing, this is about the Audi:

"On more than one occasion, the front wheels spin noticeably before there's any sense of power going rearwards. Which isn't all that pleasant."

In this kind of weather the light, sticky tyre equiped and rwd Lotus would have had very little traction whatsover, no mention of that.


This article seems to be totally written by the PR department at Hethel.
You haven't driven an Exige, have you? The Audi, like most Audis is not to drive. They have other qualities which is what those sorts of buyers want though.

Which is entirely fair and reasonable.

People complain when a Porsche wins, people complain when a Lotus wins. Can't please anyone..

And as said before, an Exige Sport 350 can be had for £50k which would probably have led to the same result.

Plate spinner

17,718 posts

201 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
SidewaysSi said:
DeltonaS said:
Another strange thing, this is about the Audi:

"On more than one occasion, the front wheels spin noticeably before there's any sense of power going rearwards. Which isn't all that pleasant."

In this kind of weather the light, sticky tyre equiped and rwd Lotus would have had very little traction whatsover, no mention of that.


This article seems to be totally written by the PR department at Hethel.
You haven't driven an Exige, have you? The Audi, like most Audis is not to drive. They have other qualities which is what those sorts of buyers want though.

Which is entirely fair and reasonable.

People complain when a Porsche wins, people complain when a Lotus wins. Can't please anyone..

And as said before, an Exige Sport 350 can be had for £50k which would probably have led to the same result.
Exactly. Plus PH is a driving enthusiasts site, the Audi was always going to come three of three.

I’m sure ‘what car’ would have declared it the winner for superior luggage space or something like that.

bobo79

296 posts

150 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
DeltonaS said:
Somehow they never mention that the Lotus is a car for small people.
I fit OK in my Elise and I'm 6'5...

bobo79

296 posts

150 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
big_rob_sydney said:
But I think there is no escaping the weight difference.

PORSCHE 718 CAYMAN GTS
Weight: 1,375kg (DIN, so with fluids and 90% fuel but without driver)

AUDI TT RS
Weight: 1,440kg (DIN, so with fluids and 90% fuel but without driver)
Only 65kg between Porsche and Audi? Much, much closer in weight than I had thought...

SFO

5,169 posts

184 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
TT is bland and digital

Bob-2146

286 posts

73 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
Reg Local said:
Yes, the engine doesn’t sound quite as good, but too much emphasis has been put on the sound by “the internet” and not enough on the car - and the engine’s - positive features. It’s torquey from low revs, which makes the car feel quicker, even when you’re not wringing its neck. It also revs very nicely & is a good chunk more powerful than the previous engine.

.
Re the 718, I totally agree. Been saying this for ages... the “sound” argument is definitely overcooked by the keyboard warriors.


Scoobysaurus

172 posts

98 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
Bob-2146 said:
Reg Local said:
.
Re the 718, I totally agree. Been saying this for ages... the “sound” argument is definitely overcooked by the keyboard warriors.
Not sure I'd entirely agree, an important part of the overall enjoyment a car delivers is undoubtedly how it sounds and the emotional attachment that helps bring through the sounds it makes.. that's whilst we still have things like flat 4/6 and V6/8/10 etc petrol engines to enjoy

av185

18,514 posts

128 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
Scoobysaurus said:
Bob-2146 said:
Reg Local said:
.
Re the 718, I totally agree. Been saying this for ages... the “sound” argument is definitely overcooked by the keyboard warriors.
Not sure I'd entirely agree, an important part of the overall enjoyment a car delivers is undoubtedly how it sounds and the emotional attachment that helps bring through the sounds it makes.. that's whilst we still have things like flat 4/6 and V6/8/10 etc petrol engines to enjoy
Yep very true.

Anyone who thinks a 4 pot turbo can be anywhere near a flat 6 na and cannot understand which is the superior engine is emotionally detached.

Their loss.

driving

tbourner

129 posts

72 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
OP I agree with the price issue. We're considering a TT-RS as we want a fun convertible to replace our 11 year old 335i e93. We're considering an M4 convertible but they're a bit too heavy (as is the e93), also considering an Alfa 4C. All come in "around" £40k dependant on age/mileage, and honestly make for a better comparison than this article. Replace the Porsche for an M4 and the Lotus for the 4C.

//edit: We haven't driven any of them. The 335i is the best idea we have for what the M4 will be like (ie: extremely good to drive), presumably the 4C will be a hoot but a bit tiring as a daily - no idea what the Audi is like!

smilo996

2,795 posts

171 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
Surely, 95% of the reason why people buy any Porsche, except a GT3 is precisely because they like the idea of a sports car but actuall want a sports GT, or in the case of the 911, somewhere to put the young kids for divorce weekends or the grandkids.

put another way:

Of course, if you're genuinely buying a sports car with the intention of driving it to work everyday, and value the niceties of a well-appointed interior, then the Cayman remains the best around

Want a sports car buy the Lotus.

Loyly

17,998 posts

160 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
The Audi is revealed as really being a bit crap next to this sort of competition.

DeltonaS

3,707 posts

139 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
Plate spinner said:
SidewaysSi said:
DeltonaS said:
Another strange thing, this is about the Audi:

"On more than one occasion, the front wheels spin noticeably before there's any sense of power going rearwards. Which isn't all that pleasant."

In this kind of weather the light, sticky tyre equiped and rwd Lotus would have had very little traction whatsover, no mention of that.


This article seems to be totally written by the PR department at Hethel.
You haven't driven an Exige, have you? The Audi, like most Audis is not to drive. They have other qualities which is what those sorts of buyers want though.

Which is entirely fair and reasonable.

People complain when a Porsche wins, people complain when a Lotus wins. Can't please anyone..

And as said before, an Exige Sport 350 can be had for £50k which would probably have led to the same result.
Exactly. Plus PH is a driving enthusiasts site, the Audi was always going to come three of three.

I’m sure ‘what car’ would have declared it the winner for superior luggage space or something like that.
Tyres, build quality, luxury, sat nav, seats, suspension (setup), tyres, 4wd vs. rwd. subsequently weight, etc.etc

I believe I said: apples vs. oranges….

I said it, PH didn´t……



Scoobysaurus

172 posts

98 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
Loyly said:
The Audi is revealed as really being a bit crap next to this sort of competition.
Yep, that's about the long and short of it, pseudo sports car shown up when put against real sports cars but then we all knew that didn't we coffee

Tuna

19,930 posts

285 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
DeltonaS said:
Another strange thing, this is about the Audi:

"On more than one occasion, the front wheels spin noticeably before there's any sense of power going rearwards. Which isn't all that pleasant."

In this kind of weather the light, sticky tyre equiped and rwd Lotus would have had very little traction whatsover, no mention of that.


This article seems to be totally written by the PR department at Hethel.
It turns out that an Exige isn't just an Audi with expensive tyres...

It says a lot about how far Lotus have come that the comparison is so favourable. Five years ago the Cayman would have won and the Exige and Audi will have fought it out for second place (too uncompromised vs. too lardy).

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
Lots of trouble usually serious...

Hope those days are long gone, but I do wonder how the residuals will stack up against ze Gerrrmans...

Scoobysaurus

172 posts

98 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
Schmed said:
Lots of trouble usually serious...

Hope those days are long gone, but I do wonder how the residuals will stack up against ze Gerrrmans...
Come on now, surely a Porsche isn't that unreliable nowadays, don't believe everything you read on the internet

On residuals - Lotus Exige is probably a lot better than a similar Boxster or Cayman. Much more limited supply, thankfully 🙂

MrBarry123

6,028 posts

122 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
I really enjoyed reading that PH, thanks.

The Lotus just looks brilliant. Whilst it’s in another price league, it also seems to be replicate this superiority in both its appearance and driving dynamics.

Fantastic. clap

Helicopter123

8,831 posts

157 months

Sunday 27th May 2018
quotequote all
Interesting read, £103k (!) car beats a £76k car and a £61k car.

Why not throw in a 488 as well, or perhaps a Golf GTi just to widen it a bit further!