RE: Audi Coupe: Spotted

RE: Audi Coupe: Spotted

Author
Discussion

Dapster

6,978 posts

181 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
It would have to be a 2.3 to be the five pot. In fact, the ad shows the engine as a 4 pot which is what the 2.0 was.



Yes, the headrest are correct. See through square headrest were an Audi design feature of the day. All models had them.

carinaman

21,332 posts

173 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
So this 2 litre 4 pot is what has been transplanted into Golfs?

Being well built and having wads of receipts doesn't mean more work won't be required and being reliant on breakers for parts, which when they can be no better than the part you're trying to replace.

The Audis I've experienced of that period had done double the mileage but didn't have bolster wear.

Wooda80

1,743 posts

76 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
I worked for an Audi dealer from 99-2004 and don't have particularly fond memories of these, they were notoriously heavy, expensive, ugly ( subjective ) at the time and slow. Slow AND thirsty if you had the 2.6. Looks quite stylish now though, I agree.

Reading this article on PH made me remember having one in stock during my time at Audi though. It was quite old for a main dealer to have, even back then, but I remember it because a guy called Bill Cox bought it. Bill had the best number plate that a man with has name could possibly have, and I was curious to know what he was driving these days. When I MOT checked his plate it turns out the Audi Coupe is still going strong with over 170,000 miles!

Smitters

4,006 posts

158 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
My Dad had one of these, J166 JHW in a metallic green. Because it was 3 door, sporty looking and not the F reg Audi 100 barge he chopped in, I thought it was the fastest car in the world.

This fact was confirmed to me in the gorges of southern France, when we were running late for a boating trip and my Dad channeled his inner Röhrl, kept it out of the rocks, armco and water, and transported a speechless 11 year old at hitherto unimaginable speeds. It really didn't matter that we missed the boat. I cannot think white water rafting would have been even slightly exciting after the journey there. There was certainly no need to utter the words "Don't tell your Mum". That was self-evident from the number of times we had been on the other side of the road.

As many of us must have done, when the DVLA went all 21st Century and gave us the MOT checker, I plugged the number in and was delighted to discover the old girl had made it to 278,890 miles by March 2009. Sadly though, the MOT expired in 2010 and has not been renewed.

Gone, but not forgotten, Jolly Hairy Wart.

Robatr0n

12,362 posts

217 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
carinaman said:
So this 2 litre 4 pot is what has been transplanted into Golfs?

Being well built and having wads of receipts doesn't mean more work won't be required and being reliant on breakers for parts, which when they can be no better than the part you're trying to replace.

The Audis I've experienced of that period had done double the mileage but didn't have bolster wear.
I must admit, that bolster wear is bad.

I sold my 2.0e on 190k and although leather, the seats were in decent nick. I sold the S2 on 170k and the seats were pristine.

Gorbyrev

1,160 posts

155 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
Robatr0n said:
carinaman said:
So this 2 litre 4 pot is what has been transplanted into Golfs?

Being well built and having wads of receipts doesn't mean more work won't be required and being reliant on breakers for parts, which when they can be no better than the part you're trying to replace.

The Audis I've experienced of that period had done double the mileage but didn't have bolster wear.
I must admit, that bolster wear is bad.

I sold my 2.0e on 190k and although leather, the seats were in decent nick. I sold the S2 on 170k and the seats were pristine.
They did wear badly. On a gen 1 coupe I took the panel on the lower part of the bench seat as donor material and replaced it with a vinyl panel from a scrapped car. All repairable.

kainedog

361 posts

175 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
Was the 2.8 any relation to the vr6 ? Think the cabriolet versions will command good money one day , seem cheap at present

carinaman

21,332 posts

173 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
The V6 in these isn't the VR6.

tim-jxv5n

238 posts

97 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
My mate had one of these but his was the 2.2 Quattro. I had a Renault 19 16 valve at the time and was very disappointed when I drove the Audi. The Renault drove better in every way

carinaman

21,332 posts

173 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
I think this is shed money. That its old and an Audi doesn't make it worth £3K. There are far better Audis out there for that money and I'd be tempted to borrow another £3K and get something far batter from PH classifieds.

For £3K you could have that leggy red Clio 200 for £2K with change left for a shed.

s m

23,258 posts

204 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
tim-jxv5n said:
My mate had one of these but his was the 2.2 Quattro. I had a Renault 19 16 valve at the time and was very disappointed when I drove the Audi. The Renault drove better in every way
You certainly wouldn't buy the 2.0 4-pot for Coupe performance - 1.3 superminis lfrom the previous decade had the same performance

They weighed considerably more than the Golf GTI - even the 2.2 only just broke into single figures for the benchmark TLGP

Still, well made and rustproofed from new
I'd prefer the 5-pot 20valve for the noise at least

carinaman

21,332 posts

173 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
I like the 5 cylinder thrum, though I've not driven a 20V one.

Didn't CAR Magazine slate the archaic underpinnings of these when the V6 versions came out?

kars

175 posts

170 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all

VolvoMariner

38 posts

148 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
I bought a 64k 2.0E saloon to take to the Le Mans Classic - and got a bit carried away...engine looks the same... reasonably torquey, quite pleasant and driveable but not fast. Sounds nice and car is very well made with incredible detail and quality at every level, visible and hidden. - didn’t miss a beat in 1100 miles though the Rev counter just packed up on the way home from work! PS image keeps flipping - any hints?

gl20

1,123 posts

150 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
My Dad had an 82 (x reg) B2 Coupé ie same shape as the contemporary UR Quattro (with the separated twin headlights) but minus the flared wheel arches. Defo fwd only and was the carb model and 5 cylinder. If Wikipedia is correct then it was 1.9 litre. Loved it but obviously lusted for the proper Quattro. Was a mid blue mettalicnwith tartan like upholstery. For whatever reason it had the less cool full headrests.

carinaman

21,332 posts

173 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
Integroo said:
A week's MOT...no thanks
It failed the MoT yesterday on a couple of small things.

ReverendCounter

6,087 posts

177 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
VolvoMariner said:
PS image keeps flipping - any hints?
Let's see if this works:



grumpy52

5,598 posts

167 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
bluemason said:
Is the headrest supposed to have the middle bit missing?
Yep !

VolvoMariner

38 posts

148 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all

Thanks! Got it now

s m

23,258 posts

204 months

Tuesday 10th July 2018
quotequote all
carinaman said:
Didn't CAR Magazine slate the archaic underpinnings of these when the V6 versions came out?
CAR certainly were no fans - see previous

They didn't much care for the chassis on the 4wd ( although no PH plasticky dash remarks like for the Porsche and Corrado smile )