RE: The ?100k Honda NSX: Spotted

RE: The ?100k Honda NSX: Spotted

Author
Discussion

Inverness

547 posts

179 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
It shares a basic engine with the Rover 800 as well.
I know PistonHeads is full of crap, but this statement is pure FAKE news!



Derek Chevalier

3,942 posts

174 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
Inverness said:
J4CKO said:
It shares a basic engine with the Rover 800 as well.
I know PistonHeads is full of crap, but this statement is pure FAKE news!
Agreed, on a par with Quins saying they will win the Premiership next season smile

mp3manager

4,254 posts

197 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
Why would anyone spend six figures on a car with a goatse interior? yuck

If you're going to spend that amount, at least get a proper R and not one with a fake red H badges.

https://torque-gt.co.uk/spotted-honda-nsx-r-na2/

For the £30k difference, you couldn't even replace the goatse interior with a real Type R one, nevermind the engine, wheels and brakes from the Type R.

Gameface

16,565 posts

78 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
Sod the rarity, at this price I'd take an LP-560 with less mileage and twice the horsepower.

J4CKO

41,653 posts

201 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
Inverness said:
J4CKO said:
It shares a basic engine with the Rover 800 as well.
I know PistonHeads is full of crap, but this statement is pure FAKE news!
Check your facts before declaring "Fake News", a much overused bandwagon term if ever I heard one...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_C_engine

Rover Sterling had a Honda C Series C25A/C27A engine, NSX a C30A.

I said "Basic Engine", its from the same family, don't think they are interchangeable.

Jex

840 posts

129 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
cib24 said:
Is it the belt that is a mere £750? I understand you cannot get to the cam belt without removing the motor which is why there is a recommended Major Engine Service on the 355 every 3 years or 30,000 miles.
No, an engine out cambelt service including parts and labour, £750. You can do it without taking the engine out, but if it is taken out it is then possible to do a more detailed inspection of other parts in case there is anything else that needs to be done (and no, they don't always find something).

LarJammer

2,240 posts

211 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
Inverness said:
J4CKO said:
It shares a basic engine with the Rover 800 as well.
I know PistonHeads is full of crap, but this statement is pure FAKE news!
Check your facts before declaring "Fake News", a much overused bandwagon term if ever I heard one...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_C_engine

Rover Sterling had a Honda C Series C25A/C27A engine, NSX a C30A.

I said "Basic Engine", its from the same family, don't think they are interchangeable.
Well they both start with the same letter of the alphabet so they must be the same...

Save the manuals

55 posts

95 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
I am more surprised it hasn't happened earlier. In a world of 400 hp all-wheel drive turbo automatic hot hatches, this is the perfect antidote.

J4CKO

41,653 posts

201 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
LarJammer said:
J4CKO said:
Inverness said:
J4CKO said:
It shares a basic engine with the Rover 800 as well.
I know PistonHeads is full of crap, but this statement is pure FAKE news!
Check your facts before declaring "Fake News", a much overused bandwagon term if ever I heard one...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_C_engine

Rover Sterling had a Honda C Series C25A/C27A engine, NSX a C30A.

I said "Basic Engine", its from the same family, don't think they are interchangeable.
Well they both start with the same letter of the alphabet so they must be the same...
Its a bit more than that isnt it.

Put an NSX unit next to one from a Rover 800 and they will look pretty much the same, the 800 had a 2.5/2.7 litre 24 valve V6 and the NSX got a 3 litre version, with Vtec and Titanium conrods, the Legend used it as well.

It was a bit of trivia, not sure why its so hard to accept, you share 96 percent of your DNA with Chimpanzees so not sure why accepting the NSX shares an engine family with a Rover is so difficult despite having the technical data in the link !

They should have done a Rover NSX, same as the Honda but with more fake wood.












j_s14a

863 posts

179 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
gtrstill said:
I actually own a 25k mile from new R34 GTR Vspec II and this is about the only other 90s Jap sports car I would trade it for. Totally get the fact that there is plenty of choice but I am fairly sure only an NSX will give the same feeling of the roller doors going up on the garage. Or a new one of course!
As nice as your car is (and all RB engined GTRs), they just don't compare to the NSX. There's no getting away from the fact that all GTRs prior to the R35 share much with base model cars. The NSX is bespoke, and hand made.

LarJammer

2,240 posts

211 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
It was a bit of trivia, not sure why its so hard to accept, you share 96 percent of your DNA with Chimpanzees
No. The C30A shares 0% of its parts with the Rover unit.

J4CKO

41,653 posts

201 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
LarJammer said:
J4CKO said:
It was a bit of trivia, not sure why its so hard to accept, you share 96 percent of your DNA with Chimpanzees
No. The C30A shares 0% of its parts with the Rover unit.
True, it isnt a "Rover unit", its a Honda one in both, they arent interchangeable, just sub groups of the same family of 90 degree V6 engines.








gtrstill

66 posts

145 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
j_s14a said:
gtrstill said:
I actually own a 25k mile from new R34 GTR Vspec II and this is about the only other 90s Jap sports car I would trade it for. Totally get the fact that there is plenty of choice but I am fairly sure only an NSX will give the same feeling of the roller doors going up on the garage. Or a new one of course!
As nice as your car is (and all RB engined GTRs), they just don't compare to the NSX. There's no getting away from the fact that all GTRs prior to the R35 share much with base model cars. The NSX is bespoke, and hand made.
Totally agree!

dobly

1,195 posts

160 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
^^ and this car doesn't have the C30A - it has the C32B (290BHP) which is different again:

Honda increased displacement to 3,179 cc (3.2 L; 194.0 cu in) through the use of larger 93 mm (3.66 in) pistons over the 90 mm (3.54 in) used in the C30A. To accommodate the larger pistons, Honda used an advanced metallurgical technique on the cylinders called Fiber Reinforced Metal (FRM), in which an ultra lightweight alumina-carbon fiber is cast into the traditional aluminum alloy for enhanced rigidity. This process allowed thinner cylinder walls to be used while providing acceptable cooling characteristics. The C32B also used 36 mm (1.4 in) intake valves, which are 1 mm (0.04 in) larger than those in the C30A.

dobly

1,195 posts

160 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
The NSX that Jenson Button used when driving for Honda F1 sold for 100K earlier this year:

http://www.parkwayspecialistcars.co.uk/stocklist/h...

Jenson had written on Instagram that he was looking for the car to buy it back - not sure if serious though.....

Edited by dobly on Thursday 26th July 01:44

Chestrockwell

2,630 posts

158 months

Thursday 26th July 2018
quotequote all
Can’t belive this has only 280 bhp, I know power isn’t always the point in these cars but 280! In 2005? A 130i had 265 bhp.

Judging by the rarity of these, perhaps it was the GT86 of today?

I wasn’t old enough in the 90’s early 00’s to remember how it was but so somebody put me in my place if I’m mistaken

Hairymonster

1,434 posts

106 months

Thursday 26th July 2018
quotequote all
Speculators will always try it on with pushing used prices up for classics, of which the original NSX is definitely one.

If a Sierra Cossie or a Lancia Delta Integrale can fetch £100k+ then the NSX almost looks a bit of a bargain!

Of course the truly shameful thing is that any classic which hits this sort of money won't be used - it will be mothballed into an air-conditioned bank vault, only to reappear on the used market in 5-10 years' time for £300k+

Edited by Hairymonster on Thursday 26th July 06:40

Kenny Powers

Original Poster:

2,618 posts

128 months

Thursday 26th July 2018
quotequote all
If no one properly cherished old things, there would soon be none left. That would be the shame. Someone wanting to keep something locked away and pampered, isn’t “shameful”. You’re free to buy one and rag it around if you prefer. Meanwhile there will still be some left in 200 years, because other people kept them locked away smile

hkz286

146 posts

85 months

Thursday 26th July 2018
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
Its a bit more than that isnt it.

Put an NSX unit next to one from a Rover 800 and they will look pretty much the same, the 800 had a 2.5/2.7 litre 24 valve V6 and the NSX got a 3 litre version, with Vtec and Titanium conrods, the Legend used it as well.

It was a bit of trivia, not sure why its so hard to accept, you share 96 percent of your DNA with Chimpanzees so not sure why accepting the NSX shares an engine family with a Rover is so difficult despite having the technical data in the link !

They should have done a Rover NSX, same as the Honda but with more fake wood.
the only component they share is an oil filter,

that is literally it. Ask me how I know :P

I genuinely thought that with one half of car enthusiasts telling me its basically a rover engine and the other half telling me its an accord engine, it would be cheap to replace bits.

literally nothing matches, bar the aforementioned oil filter. The vtec solenoid gaskets are the same as a Honda b16 however.

Also the block and heads (sohc vs dohc etc) are different, the crank, rods and pistons are different. They share the same bore spacing but that's where it ends unfortunately, I would love to be able to pick up spares from a local motor factors as opposed to having to wait weeks and weeks for factories in japan to make, and then deliver it to me me smile

it might be from the same family according the Honda engine designations, but I'm fairly sure its shares more in common with a b series than any other c series engine :P





Edited by hkz286 on Thursday 26th July 07:58


Edited by hkz286 on Thursday 26th July 08:01

havoc

30,100 posts

236 months

Thursday 26th July 2018
quotequote all
Objectively (and as an owner) I really do see the point of those people saying "these cars aren't worth £100k".


However subjectively, i.e. looking at the whole market, where E30 M3s and Sierra RS500s fetch £100k, and almost ANY classic 911 is even more (read old and slow air-cooled 911 to all the modern-car "look at my power" protagonists), the NSX in general looks like a bargain, and even the £100k cars are under-valued compared to their Porsche and Ferrari comparators.


The problem is that the investors (esp. Far East ones with a ton of cash) have got a firm hold on the classic and supercar markets now, which has pulled prices of most desirable cars WELL beyond any consideration of the true value of the cars*. Which is utterly st news for the enthusiast, as more and more cars will be sequestered away in a cocoon to avoid adding "value-destroying" mileage, rather than being used as intended, and instead will be adding to the future maintenance problems as everything will arguably dry-out / seize-up.

Until/unless the global economy pops badly, this isn't now going to change.


* And well beyond reach of most mere-mortal enthusiasts who were hoping to buy their childhood hero car when they were older. I couldn't afford my NSX now and consider myself very lucky that I bought when I did...even if I was silly and bought with heart not with an eye on 'investment' :spit: