RE: Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Driven

RE: Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Driven

Author
Discussion

Ares

11,000 posts

121 months

Thursday 25th October 2018
quotequote all
skyrover said:
Barga said:
They wouldn't be to wide at 78.1 inches but at 87.4 inches which they are I find them a bit wide for multi-storey car parks and narrow roads.
You are including mirrors which are not part of standard vehicle width measurement.

A range rover body is 78.1 inches wide
So the anti-SUV campaigners are actually anti-large wing-mirror campaigners... wink

Barga

12,241 posts

207 months

Thursday 25th October 2018
quotequote all
skyrover said:
Barga said:
They wouldn't be to wide at 78.1 inches but at 87.4 inches which they are I find them a bit wide for multi-storey car parks and narrow roads.
You are including mirrors which are not part of standard vehicle width measurement.

A range rover body is 78.1 inches wide
Mirrors folded it comes in at 2073mm which by my reckoning is 81.6 inches but I don't drive with my mirrors folded in so 87.4 inches stands.

skyrover

12,674 posts

205 months

Thursday 25th October 2018
quotequote all
In that case you need to factor in the wing mirrors on other vehicles.

So the range rover mirrors are dwarfed by the massive lugs on vans and trucks, and everyday hatchbacks are about 80 inches when you factor in the mirrors

Let's just stick to standard body widths like everyone else eh?

At 78.1 inches wide the Range Rover is only a few inches wider than a jaguar f-type (75.7 in)

DonkeyApple

55,432 posts

170 months

Friday 26th October 2018
quotequote all
As long as your mirrors are at a different height they’re irrelevantbiggrin

And sticking an F type through width restrictions is harder than sticking a Rangie through whose mirror are above them.

Francis85

176 posts

69 months

Friday 26th October 2018
quotequote all
After seeing a Bentayga next to me for the first time, I don't think this Cullinan thing is the ugliest suv out there.

Barga

12,241 posts

207 months

Friday 26th October 2018
quotequote all
skyrover said:
In that case you need to factor in the wing mirrors on other vehicles.

So the range rover mirrors are dwarfed by the massive lugs on vans and trucks, and everyday hatchbacks are about 80 inches when you factor in the mirrors

Let's just stick to standard body widths like everyone else eh?

At 78.1 inches wide the Range Rover is only a few inches wider than a jaguar f-type (75.7 in)
Just so we are clear the width with folded mirrors is 2073mm (81.6 inches)

HTH.

sidesauce

2,482 posts

219 months

Friday 26th October 2018
quotequote all
Barga said:
Just so we are clear the width with folded mirrors is 2073mm (81.6 inches)

HTH.
Isn't that a Range Rover Sport, not a FFRR?

Barga

12,241 posts

207 months

Friday 26th October 2018
quotequote all
sidesauce said:
sn't that a Range Rover Sport, not a FFRR?
Same width!

skyrover

12,674 posts

205 months

Friday 26th October 2018
quotequote all
That includes the mirror stubs... it's not the standard body width measurement

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range_Rover_%28L40...

E65Ross

35,108 posts

213 months

Friday 26th October 2018
quotequote all
Jeez, those who think it's too wide need to try driving a van or something. Plenty of other vehicles out there with drivers who don't moan. Someone saying it's too wide for multi-storey car parks then saying the width stated by someone else didn't include wing mirrors....last time I drove a wide car at a MS car park it was tight because of the risk of kerbing the wheels, not scraping the wing mirrors. Mirrors also fold in in the rare situation this is a necessity.

Barga

12,241 posts

207 months

Friday 26th October 2018
quotequote all
skyrover said:
That includes the mirror stubs... it's not the standard body width measurement

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range_Rover_%28L40...
So are you saying that not only folding the mirrors that the complete removal of the mirrors and "stubs" is a rational way of measuring the width of a car for everyday use? rofl

Edited by Barga on Friday 26th October 13:01

skyrover

12,674 posts

205 months

Friday 26th October 2018
quotequote all
Yes it's the industry standard... you might want to do some research.

All those cars on Wikipedia and elsewhere... that's the body width listed.

Escort3500

11,919 posts

146 months

Friday 26th October 2018
quotequote all
Fascinating discussion smile

Barga

12,241 posts

207 months

Friday 26th October 2018
quotequote all
skyrover said:
Yes it's the industry standard... you might want to do some research.

All those cars on Wikipedia and elsewhere... that's the body width listed.
I would imagine that most RR have mirrors though or if they go by the "industry standard" when negotiating tight spaces, maybe not! wink

skyrover

12,674 posts

205 months

Friday 26th October 2018
quotequote all
Well the same goes for all cars does it not?

We need a useful metric to compare vehicles and the industry seems to list body width for some reason, rightly or wrongly.

That makes your range rover 78.1 inches wide (plus mirrors)

Shakermaker

11,317 posts

101 months

Friday 26th October 2018
quotequote all
It is as useful as every other metric, in that it doesn't really tell you anything at all over and above it being a number.

It could well be that it is really wide AND has enormous doors which are hinged really badly meaning you have to open them extra-wide to actually get in or out of the vehicle. Meaning that whilst the car, when static, will fit within a standard size parking bay, you might not actually be able to get in or out of it, or walk alongside it, if someone else is parked next to you.

It is like the regular talk of boot space measured in litres, but less talk about the actual aperture size you have available to use, or how that space is arranged around other bits of the car.

Ares

11,000 posts

121 months

Friday 26th October 2018
quotequote all
Sweet Jesus, is the primary argument for/against SUVs now the size of wing mirrors?

The FFRR is not too big for UK roads, let alone anywhere else in the world.

If you can't manage a FFRR on UK roads, you should have your licence clipped to allow you only to drive mini-cars. FFS rolleyes MTFU snowflakes etc.

Barga

12,241 posts

207 months

Friday 26th October 2018
quotequote all
skyrover said:
Well the same goes for all cars does it not?

We need a useful metric to compare vehicles and the industry seems to list body width for some reason, rightly or wrongly.

That makes your range rover 78.1 inches wide (plus mirrors)
It's actually 2073mm going by Landrover!

DonkeyApple

55,432 posts

170 months

Friday 26th October 2018
quotequote all
Barga said:
It's actually 2073mm going by Landrover!
Land Rover, the people who built the left side of my Rangie half an inch longer than the right. I’m not convinced they’re that competent with a tape measure. biggrin

Barga

12,241 posts

207 months

Friday 26th October 2018
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
Barga said:
It's actually 2073mm going by Landrover!
Land Rover, the people who built the left side of my Rangie half an inch longer than the right. I’m not convinced they’re that competent with a tape measure. biggrin
smile