RE: BMW Z4 M40i: Driven

RE: BMW Z4 M40i: Driven

Author
Discussion

MX6

5,983 posts

213 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
I guess the negative responce regarding the looks is quite predictable, I think as modern cars go it looks alright. Yes the overall shape is quite bloated looking and the surface details, vents, wheel design are all very fussy, but that's par for the course these days isn't it, that's what constitutes "visual drama" I guess.

It sounds like despite the product designer Michael Wimbeck claims that the previous generation was too Mercedes-ish, the new one isn't all that different.

Interesting comments about the price, it seems to be positioned okay to me. I would have thought the F Type is a direct competitor and that costs more for the 3.0 V6.

Deep Thought

35,822 posts

197 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
MX6 said:
I guess the negative responce regarding the looks is quite predictable, I think as modern cars go it looks alright. Yes the overall shape is quite bloated looking and the surface details, vents, wheel design are all very fussy, but that's par for the course these days isn't it, that's what constitutes "visual drama" I guess.

It sounds like despite the product designer Michael Wimbeck claims that the previous generation was too Mercedes-ish, the new one isn't all that different.

Interesting comments about the price, it seems to be positioned okay to me. I would have thought the F Type is a direct competitor and that costs more for the 3.0 V6.
I think an F Type is in a different league entirely.

Honeywell

1,375 posts

98 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
Test driver said:
Mx5 driver jealous of z4 shocker.
I used to have a Z4...

I’ve now got a GT86 (amongst other vehicles)

The MX5 wasn’t mine.



MX6

5,983 posts

213 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
Deep Thought said:
I think an F Type is in a different league entirely.
In what way would you say? Yes I think the F Type subjectively looks better, and it has the R and SVR halo models that lift the image. But now it has the 2.0 four pot in the range it's on a par with this Z4 in terms of hardware and spec.

va1o

16,032 posts

207 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
I've got one on order arriving early next year, pretty excited as it should be one of the first in the country! Went for the M40i as reviewed here.

It's replacing my 2015 TT and I had a 2013 M135i before that. Hoping it will offer the best of both worlds, i.e. sports car looks and a strong 6-cylinder engine with good handling. Can't wait driving

E65Ross

35,080 posts

212 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
MX6 said:
Deep Thought said:
I think an F Type is in a different league entirely.
In what way would you say? Yes I think the F Type subjectively looks better, and it has the R and SVR halo models that lift the image. But now it has the 2.0 four pot in the range it's on a par with this Z4 in terms of hardware and spec.
If one wants a 6 cylinder F Type you need to spend a fair bit more than £50k IIRC.

John.Taylor

55 posts

180 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
MitchT said:
Makes the first generation Z4 look like a piece of timeless design.
Agreed, this is just too fussy and heavy looking.

MX6

5,983 posts

213 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
E65Ross said:
MX6 said:
Deep Thought said:
I think an F Type is in a different league entirely.
In what way would you say? Yes I think the F Type subjectively looks better, and it has the R and SVR halo models that lift the image. But now it has the 2.0 four pot in the range it's on a par with this Z4 in terms of hardware and spec.
If one wants a 6 cylinder F Type you need to spend a fair bit more than £50k IIRC.
The F Type 6 cylinder supercharged is £56k, as I mentioned above it's more than this M40i. The 300bhp four cylinder is about £52k so similar... I just thought it was an obvious competitor, even though the Z4 range starts at a lower level.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
Having had one of the last generation Z4’s, and loving the concept car, I was really looking forward to this car.

I’ll certainly go and see it in the flesh before making my mind up but those pictures, especially of the front, do not bode well imo.

Too generic and too bland.

greghm

440 posts

101 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
Front: Fiat or Mazda
Side: Nissan 350Z
Back: new style of Merdeces/BWM

Good effort for the engine

AppleJuice

2,154 posts

85 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
Enricogto said:
For full disclosure, i've owned since new one of the first ever produced Z4M Coupe. When the E89 was launched i was invited by my dealer to test drive the 35i. Appalling experience, not a sport car and not the sport car feeling i was looking for. I was hoping for it to get the S62 to create an M version which i may have considered, but it never came. I haven't of course driven the G29 so i will reserve judgement, but from what i read it seems very similar with to an E89 in a new frock.
Did you mean:S65?

Mr_Sukebe

375 posts

208 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
MX6 said:
In what way would you say? Yes I think the F Type subjectively looks better, and it has the R and SVR halo models that lift the image. But now it has the 2.0 four pot in the range it's on a par with this Z4 in terms of hardware and spec.
Whilst I appreciate that looks are subjective, the new Z4 is just a boring design. The F-Type is probably the best looking car in production at present, just fabulous looking. Shame that it's also a complete lard-arse.

Martin 480 Turbo

602 posts

187 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all


The last time the world leading performance car brands lost their plot looked vastly simular, but nearly nobody remembers.

- the engines castrated by smog equipment - Check
- the car designs bloated to satisfy marketing charts - Check
- loosing your core market to new contenders - Check

Martin

itidiot

73 posts

125 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
The M40i will be a rare derivative @ £50k - they will be all 2.0 engine units parked outside a hair salon (or opticians).

Vee12V

1,334 posts

160 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
I like the fact it's gone back to a canvas roof, but other than that, a bit of a disappointment.

Lowtimer

4,286 posts

168 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
rare6499 said:
I quite like it but 1500kg...how?
All modern cars are lardy. A tin-top 240i coupe with the eight speed autobox is 1540kg. Why would this convertible be any lighter?

cerb4.5lee

30,601 posts

180 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
Enricogto said:
What makes the E85/86 still appealing (and unbearable to people like Cerb4.5lee) is it's compact size (4.10m long), the great N/A engines (i know they won't come back, yet..), the sometimes hard to manage gearbox, which makes for an engaging and demanding driving experience, and the lines which make it a modern design still to date - who would have thought that we would be regretting the departure of Chris Bangle....
I don't mind the compact size but you're correct that I don't have much love for the old N/A engines(or the manual gearbox in the M cars). You make a very valid point regards Chris Bangle for sure, this one looks like it was designed by Stevie Wonder! smile

unpc

2,835 posts

213 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
Blimey that article rather damned it with faint praise. Telegraph thought it was a dud as well. I think it's hideous inside and out. Mazda and Jag are doing both ends of the spectrum better IMO.

Back when I were a lad, I used to see BMW as an aspirational brand and owned quite a few. Increasing I see them as more of a budget brand these days with the streets seemingly infested with 1 series and MPVs. I guess that's the perils of chasing volume above all else.

Black S2K

1,473 posts

249 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
mikey k said:
Black S2K said:
I cannot help feeling that re-bodying an M2 as a Z2 would have been the way to go.

If you cannot beat the MX-5, er, better it...
S2K is still better wink
Troo...

But Honda CBA to replace it. And you bought them all.

underphil

1,246 posts

210 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
Lowtimer said:
rare6499 said:
I quite like it but 1500kg...how?
All modern cars are lardy. A tin-top 240i coupe with the eight speed autobox is 1540kg. Why would this convertible be any lighter?
Because Porsche manage to make a lighter car