RE: Audi R8 Performance: Driven

RE: Audi R8 Performance: Driven

Author
Discussion

MrwReckless

123 posts

120 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
slipstream 1985 said:
you seriously want a v6 over a v10?
I suspect the (unwritten) onus was on the inevitable engine downsizing all manufacturers stare down the barrel at...

Regards

Gameface

16,565 posts

78 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
SidewaysSi said:
Terminator X said:
SidewaysSi said:
Nors said:
Cold said:
SidewaysSi said:
Why not just get a TT?
What, the 620 bhp V10 mid-engined TT? Sure, get one of those.
Indeed. biglaugh
Pretty much the same thing isn't it? Chip a TTRS and it won't be much slower.

They all drive the same anyway. You will get 90% of the experience in an A1 TFSI.
The rumour is that Audi had to detune the current TTRS as it was on a par with the R8 speed wise when testing! Imho it looks like a junior R8 too. Your point about the A1 did have me rofl though.

TX.
I do love Audi fans... smile
I do love bullst internet rumours...

big_rob_sydney

3,405 posts

195 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
Midgster said:
Even on a track actually there is hardly any difference (albeit previous model V10)
Seems a big price difference for the "massive" gain of 0.4 seconds across a 71 second lap...

I wonder how much it costs to have a simple tune done on the TTRS? £100,000?

F1GTRUeno

6,356 posts

219 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
big_rob_sydney said:
Seems a big price difference for the "massive" gain of 0.4 seconds across a 71 second lap...

I wonder how much it costs to have a simple tune done on the TTRS? £100,000?
Pretty sure the people the buy these don't give a fk about track times.

200Plus Club

10,772 posts

279 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
No TT on earth sounds like a V8 R8 or V10 with exhausts fitted. Comparing apples with onions.

Midgster

571 posts

235 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
F1GTRUeno said:
big_rob_sydney said:
Seems a big price difference for the "massive" gain of 0.4 seconds across a 71 second lap...

I wonder how much it costs to have a simple tune done on the TTRS? £100,000?
Pretty sure the people the buy these don't give a fk about track times.
Agree, but I think what everyone is trying to get at, including me, is that you don't get much for your extra £100,000 over a TT RS. Yes, it's different, better even, but not £100,000 beter
People want drama, excitement, a childish grin and something amazing for £100,000 and even those on here that have a V10 R8 have admitted that it is lacking that certain "je ne sais quoi" that a six figure car should possess.

Housey

2,076 posts

228 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
Midgster said:
Housey said:
To those suggesting it's just like a TT (I have driven a few of them including the RS) stop talking out of your ass and/or trolling, it makes you seem ill informed, childish or as thick as fk. It is nothing like a TT to drive, massively more special.
.
As said, I don't own either, so don't have the experience you have of these cars, but have driven both. If you wore a helmet that blocked out the interior and the engine note, there is not a big enough difference between the R8 and the TT RS for 90% (a complete assumption on my behalf) of even pistonhead drivers to tell the 2 apart when driving. I'm sure on the track ragging the cars silly they are quite distinguishable, but on UK roads, they are too similar to warrant a price 3 times that of a TT RS. Calling poeple thick as f**k has made you look more childish than those you think are ill informed.

Housey said:
However putting the dickwad comments to one side, it isn't special enough for the price, engine aside and has sadly inherited many of the Audi traits we all love (I mean loathe) such as numb steering, over assisted brakes and a general competence without event. Sure all the tech is nice have have, the systems are clever and it is a nice place to be. But as has been said you sit on it not in it (mine is the same) and though you get used to that take a 570S out or GT3, a car a really miss and you realise how Audi still doesn't get immersion.
.
You've basically just agreed with the so called dickwad comments yourself.

The A1 TFSi comment I'm sure was a touch too far, but most people get the point with Audi's,
Nah, not even close to agreeing and you know it and as you said, you don't have the experience I do and to suggest a driver can not tell the difference means one of two things. You are utterly clueless or lying. That is my point, I don't care if some people don't like my car, I am happy with it, all that matters.

Rumblestripe

2,950 posts

163 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
IMO, it's the looks that are the problem. At a glance on the road it's just another Audi. It lacks presence.

Even the interior (which if you are the owner is the bit you see most often) it remains very identifiably Audi. Beautifully screwed together those seats look almost like they were forged from solid leather, the rest... meh.

Oh and that spoiler looks like it should be drooping over the arse-end of a 70s Cortina. Nasty.

jakesmith

9,461 posts

172 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
Rumblestripe said:
IMO, it's the looks that are the problem. At a glance on the road it's just another Audi. It lacks presence.

Even the interior (which if you are the owner is the bit you see most often) it remains very identifiably Audi. Beautifully screwed together those seats look almost like they were forged from solid leather, the rest... meh.

Oh and that spoiler looks like it should be drooping over the arse-end of a 70s Cortina. Nasty.
What do you drive buddy?

bigmowley

1,896 posts

177 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
I took the plunge and bought a RWS at the beginning of this year. Two main reasons firstly after owning nearly every iteration of 911 GT3 over the last 15 years or so I got knocked back by Porsche on a Gen 2 991 GT3 because "I dont buy enough standard Porsche models to be allocated a GT3!" Secondly I am an engine man and I love N/A V10 engines so it had to be done. The car was an absolute bargain as well, another fact not to be overlooked.

Its been a great summer and I have enjoyed uprating the car to get it to where I want it. I have fitted the AudiSport Adjustable coil overs along with the bespoke Cup2 tyres that are an option in the USA. I have it much lower with a more track focused geometry set up. I have uprated the brakes, fitted a harness bar and harnesses. After all that It still stands me at less than the list price of a base model GT3. Happy days.

This is now the car that Audi should have put out. On track it is very quick, handles great and stops just about OK. Not sure about the quoted power output, but they must have very big horses at Audi! The car is considerably quicker in the mid range than any of my GT3's and is seting quicker laptimes, The engine is an absolute jewel especially right at the top end. I love the Porsche engine but I never liked the sound of the last 500RPM or so as it gets very mechanically noisy, it is a very close call but the V10 is the better, a sublime unit. The Porsche is still just the better track car, better brakes and a better front end but its very very close now.

On the road though the Audi is massively better than a GT3. Its an absolute belter for cruising along, the excellent Bose system pumping out the tunes (try that in your GT3!) The gearbox and engine in comfort mode are superbly calibrated very smooth and quiet, No roll cage rattles, and droning exhaust. Very comfortable, even lowered and stiffened up. Excellent nav, phone integration, instruments, good visibility etc etc. I also dont mind where I park it, its just another TT after all. wink

So not really a supercar then! Much too easy to drive! For me its perfect, I can drive to the track much like any other top end Audi product, tweak the tyre pressures and thrash the living daylights out of it all day. For added pleasure I slip past the odd GT3 on the straights, with a wry grin.








Rumblestripe

2,950 posts

163 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
jakesmith said:
Rumblestripe said:
IMO, it's the looks that are the problem. At a glance on the road it's just another Audi. It lacks presence.

Even the interior (which if you are the owner is the bit you see most often) it remains very identifiably Audi. Beautifully screwed together those seats look almost like they were forged from solid leather, the rest... meh.

Oh and that spoiler looks like it should be drooping over the arse-end of a 70s Cortina. Nasty.
What do you drive buddy?
Not sure what that has to do with my views on the aesthetics of these cars? But looking at a TT as a possibility in the new year (never going to get to an R8 but hey ho)

jakesmith

9,461 posts

172 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
Rumblestripe said:
Not sure what that has to do with my views on the aesthetics of these cars? But looking at a TT as a possibility in the new year (never going to get to an R8 but hey ho)
Sure, sure. This is a car forum for people interested in cars so surely that makes it a legitimate question

Nice cars the tt, which one are you thinking of out of interest?

Rumblestripe

2,950 posts

163 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
jakesmith said:
Sure, sure. This is a car forum for people interested in cars so surely that makes it a legitimate question

Nice cars the tt, which one are you thinking of out of interest?
Anything except an oil burner. I need to do a sixty mile roundtrip commute so nothing too thirsty. I have bought several Audis for the business I work for and I find them underwhelming and not impressed with their servicing costs either. But the TT is pretty so it's on the list. (Not sure what else is GT86 +?) won't be new, something with under 40k on it as I'll double that in two years which is a big hit on a new car.

Midgster

571 posts

235 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
Housey said:
Midgster said:
Housey said:
To those suggesting it's just like a TT (I have driven a few of them including the RS) stop talking out of your ass and/or trolling, it makes you seem ill informed, childish or as thick as fk. It is nothing like a TT to drive, massively more special.
.
As said, I don't own either, so don't have the experience you have of these cars, but have driven both. If you wore a helmet that blocked out the interior and the engine note, there is not a big enough difference between the R8 and the TT RS for 90% (a complete assumption on my behalf) of even pistonhead drivers to tell the 2 apart when driving. I'm sure on the track ragging the cars silly they are quite distinguishable, but on UK roads, they are too similar to warrant a price 3 times that of a TT RS. Calling poeple thick as f**k has made you look more childish than those you think are ill informed.

Housey said:
However putting the dickwad comments to one side, it isn't special enough for the price, engine aside and has sadly inherited many of the Audi traits we all love (I mean loathe) such as numb steering, over assisted brakes and a general competence without event. Sure all the tech is nice have have, the systems are clever and it is a nice place to be. But as has been said you sit on it not in it (mine is the same) and though you get used to that take a 570S out or GT3, a car a really miss and you realise how Audi still doesn't get immersion.
.
You've basically just agreed with the so called dickwad comments yourself.

The A1 TFSi comment I'm sure was a touch too far, but most people get the point with Audi's,
Nah, not even close to agreeing and you know it and as you said, you don't have the experience I do and to suggest a driver can not tell the difference means one of two things. You are utterly clueless or lying. That is my point, I don't care if some people don't like my car, I am happy with it, all that matters.
OK big guy, I bow to your driving god status.....and i do like, nay love the R8, always have, I get the V8 and would buy a V8, just don't think there is £100,000 difference between even the V10 and a TT RS. Never said it wasn't a better car. It;s just the £100,000 difference is the problem.


Edited by Midgster on Monday 19th November 21:15

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

235 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
Midgster said:
Housey said:
Midgster said:
Housey said:
To those suggesting it's just like a TT (I have driven a few of them including the RS) stop talking out of your ass and/or trolling, it makes you seem ill informed, childish or as thick as fk. It is nothing like a TT to drive, massively more special.
.
As said, I don't own either, so don't have the experience you have of these cars, but have driven both. If you wore a helmet that blocked out the interior and the engine note, there is not a big enough difference between the R8 and the TT RS for 90% (a complete assumption on my behalf) of even pistonhead drivers to tell the 2 apart when driving. I'm sure on the track ragging the cars silly they are quite distinguishable, but on UK roads, they are too similar to warrant a price 3 times that of a TT RS. Calling poeple thick as f**k has made you look more childish than those you think are ill informed.

Housey said:
However putting the dickwad comments to one side, it isn't special enough for the price, engine aside and has sadly inherited many of the Audi traits we all love (I mean loathe) such as numb steering, over assisted brakes and a general competence without event. Sure all the tech is nice have have, the systems are clever and it is a nice place to be. But as has been said you sit on it not in it (mine is the same) and though you get used to that take a 570S out or GT3, a car a really miss and you realise how Audi still doesn't get immersion.
.
You've basically just agreed with the so called dickwad comments yourself.

The A1 TFSi comment I'm sure was a touch too far, but most people get the point with Audi's,
Nah, not even close to agreeing and you know it and as you said, you don't have the experience I do and to suggest a driver can not tell the difference means one of two things. You are utterly clueless or lying. That is my point, I don't care if some people don't like my car, I am happy with it, all that matters.
OK big guy, I bow to your driving god status.
I wouldn't. The TT kills the R8. Dead. wink

el romeral

1,055 posts

138 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
There is just too much grill going on at the front - and the rear for that matter.

E65Ross

35,093 posts

213 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
SidewaysSi said:
I wouldn't. The TT kills the R8. Dead. wink
It does in a fuel consumption competition, I suppose.

Midgster

571 posts

235 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
el romeral said:
There is just too much grill going on at the front - and the rear for that matter.
Thought the same, reckon it'll be the first car in history to look better with a huge UK registration plate thrown on to cover a bit of it up

Mark-C

5,122 posts

206 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
Abc321 said:
SidewaysSi said:
Nors said:
Cold said:
SidewaysSi said:
Why not just get a TT?
What, the 620 bhp V10 mid-engined TT? Sure, get one of those.
Indeed. biglaugh
Pretty much the same thing isn't it? Chip a TTRS and it won't be much slower.

They all drive the same anyway. You will get 90% of the experience in an A1 TFSI.
Troll is trolling.
And not very good at it either! I’d go for fkwit rather than troll thumbup

jakesmith

9,461 posts

172 months

Monday 19th November 2018
quotequote all
SidewaysSi said:
I wouldn't. The TT kills the R8. Dead. wink
Well I do hope you are joking! But in case you are not -

If what you're saying is the case why are they still selling them at all?
You might not see the value but the market disagrees with you as they are selling

There are intangibles about owning a car like an R8 that make it worth the extra cost & running costs to buyers over the TT RS
I have the basic V8 R8, I wouldn't consider the TT RS that I could have bought in its place. I wanted a special & rare naturally aspirated V8 hand built flagship car that is pretty close to a supercar in terms of its looks and soundtrack - Quicksilver Supersprint being fitted tomorrow smile I didn't want a very fast coupe based on a Golf. TT RS is a very fast competent vehicle but doesn't tick any of those boxes that matter to me

The sort of person buying one of these V10's new probably buys a new car in the £130k-£200k range every 1-2 years and wants something different to the Ferarri, Lambo, McLarrens that they have already tried, or maybe wants something more understated so the more subtle looks are a selling point. A TT is never going to compete no matter how good they are.

It is worth what people would pay for it and they are selling loads. It might not be worth any more than the TT to you but are you the target market or a viable buyer of one of these cars?

Comparing performance and lap times is also not really that relevant either. A Golf R can be made to go very very fast but noone into supercars would see it as a viable alternative so who cares. A subaru WRX would lap a track as fast as a 360 Ferarri. It is irrelevant they compete in desperate sectors and people who have money to spend see value in race heritage, 8-10 cylinder Nasp engines, exotic looks, things like the glass engine cover etc etc. All of which the R8 has.