Which company do you think produce the best petrol engines?
Discussion
Dannbodge said:
It's got to be VAG/BMW
IMO certainly not BMW. Every recent 4 pot (which is what OP asks for really) they have f'ed up it seems, what with recalls and timing chain problems and none of them I can think of are actually any better than competitorsI reckon for 4 pots honda B and K series?
DoubleD said:
TwinExit said:
DoubleD said:
Might be worth you having a glance at the 1st post
Why have you decided to single out my post?The subject has veered towards engines of various capacities and configuration.
The Vambo said:
I raise you the LS engines.
Thornaby said:
Audi 5 pot
lornemalvo said:
The Lexus V8 engine
The Vambo said:
Read the title.
That’s the wonderful thing about he internet - we can ignore you and talk about the things that interest us. So tough luck! Edited by anonymous-user on Wednesday 12th December 21:13
TDilover said:
Hi all,
Just interested to hear your thoughts on this subject in regards to more every day companies like Ford, Mercedes, toyota/lexus not Ferrari for example.
We can divide it into sections. i.e best petrol turbo engine 1.2 and below, 1.3-1.6,1.7-2.0. I'm thinking engines in these ranges as most every day companies produce engines upto 2.0. I'm not really looking for answers beyond that.
For 2.0L. The AMG45 has astonishing numbers for a production 2.0, but is still really driveable. Already the most powerful and next years will have 400bhp. Has to be up there. Honda Vtec especially the new one in the Civic are also excellent. . Just interested to hear your thoughts on this subject in regards to more every day companies like Ford, Mercedes, toyota/lexus not Ferrari for example.
We can divide it into sections. i.e best petrol turbo engine 1.2 and below, 1.3-1.6,1.7-2.0. I'm thinking engines in these ranges as most every day companies produce engines upto 2.0. I'm not really looking for answers beyond that.
Edited by Graveworm on Wednesday 12th December 21:53
For small capacity i'd go with the 1.0 Ecoboost, for something old the 1.7 yamaha lump out of the Puma, the K series for all its faults is a very good engine, Honda and Toyota need to be in there for the revtastic engines they produce.
Modern wise, the 1.6 shared between Mini and PSA, its characterful and produces some very good figures.
Modern wise, the 1.6 shared between Mini and PSA, its characterful and produces some very good figures.
Blanchimont said:
Honda's K20 isn't a bad engine.
8k RPM, can take a fk tonne of abuse. Breathing Mods can do 250hp, and boosted can take double the standard output (and then some) on standard internals and still take a bashing and not break.
They like a drink, and need regular oil top ups.
I will see your K20 and raise you an F20C.8k RPM, can take a fk tonne of abuse. Breathing Mods can do 250hp, and boosted can take double the standard output (and then some) on standard internals and still take a bashing and not break.
They like a drink, and need regular oil top ups.
wormus said:
DoubleD said:
TwinExit said:
DoubleD said:
Might be worth you having a glance at the 1st post
Why have you decided to single out my post?The subject has veered towards engines of various capacities and configuration.
The Vambo said:
I raise you the LS engines.
Thornaby said:
Audi 5 pot
lornemalvo said:
The Lexus V8 engine
The Vambo said:
Read the title.
That’s the wonderful thing about he internet - we can ignore you and talk about the things that interest us. So tough luck! Edited by wormus on Wednesday 12th December 21:13
left field choice . mazda with their new skyactiv -x lump . just because they've went down a totally different route to the rest and have stuck to their guns
that and numerous rotary lumps over the years.
and err merc, M156 and 159
100bhp/litre 8000 rpm redline, and quite possibly the best sounding lump that will be listed here.
also have a big soft spot for the m276 v12 bi turbo
saying either 6.0l . v12 . or bi turbo means you have something interesting . all 3..............
that and numerous rotary lumps over the years.
and err merc, M156 and 159
100bhp/litre 8000 rpm redline, and quite possibly the best sounding lump that will be listed here.
also have a big soft spot for the m276 v12 bi turbo
saying either 6.0l . v12 . or bi turbo means you have something interesting . all 3..............
I've always had the general opinion that Merc produces cars that handle extremely poorly but are second to none when it comes to engines, especially the stuff AMG get their hands on..... No justification for any of that, never driven one and the only ones I've been in were probably taxis.
drd63 said:
If only for the fact it has a name, not a number I put forward the V8 Coyote currently fitted to the Mustang. That aside it’s a pretty good engine, very tuneable, strong and reliable. The Vodoo engine in the 350R Mustang (I think) worthy of a mention too.
The Ford isn’t a bad engine. But it’s longer, wider, taller and heavier than the engines from GM and Chrysler. But doesn’t seem to offer any benefits really. The flat plane crank version is pretty cool though. wormus said:
No, it really doesn’t. VAG in particular make some of the worst 4 cylinder engines in history and most of those in past 20 years have been diesels. W12 notwithstanding. Anyone remember the BMW vanos disaster or the unreliable V10 bearings?
I put forward the GM LS series V8 as a proper engine. Powerful, fuel efficient, simple, cheap, reliable and very, very tuneable. Most will make 700hp with a bolt on supercharger and that’s without the fabulous V8 noise. You can also swap one for another as they are all the same basic architecture.
Not like the usual German whip fanboy rubbish!
This plus the g463 and the skyline engine.. Both take serious tuning before they need much doing to them. Lets admit it, some car manufacturers have made some amazing engines and conversely poor engines over their time. I put forward the GM LS series V8 as a proper engine. Powerful, fuel efficient, simple, cheap, reliable and very, very tuneable. Most will make 700hp with a bolt on supercharger and that’s without the fabulous V8 noise. You can also swap one for another as they are all the same basic architecture.
Not like the usual German whip fanboy rubbish!
Edited by wormus on Wednesday 12th December 15:42
Leon R said:
BMW wins a lot of awards with their engines.
Aside from the piss on the block F1 special, I wouldn't hold BMW as a particularly special producer of 2l & down engines. When they can be arsed, and/or the right person is in charge, I'll take the Honda card , though would still like it to be N/A.
The timeline has to be a factor.
1970s Fiat Lampredi engines and Alfas of that era were way ahead of the Ford Pinto and MG B-Series boat anchors!
But right now I don't think anyone makes anything that special - everything seems to need a turbo.
Although the BMW S54 was pretty special in it's day.
1970s Fiat Lampredi engines and Alfas of that era were way ahead of the Ford Pinto and MG B-Series boat anchors!
But right now I don't think anyone makes anything that special - everything seems to need a turbo.
Although the BMW S54 was pretty special in it's day.
Mr Tidy said:
The timeline has to be a factor.
1970s Fiat Lampredi engines and Alfas of that era were way ahead of the Ford Pinto and MG B-Series boat anchors!
But right now I don't think anyone makes anything that special - everything seems to need a turbo.
Although the BMW S54 was pretty special in it's day.
Best small non-turbo engines produced today might well be the SkyActiv units in many Mazda. They're efficient, clean and have decent delivery.1970s Fiat Lampredi engines and Alfas of that era were way ahead of the Ford Pinto and MG B-Series boat anchors!
But right now I don't think anyone makes anything that special - everything seems to need a turbo.
Although the BMW S54 was pretty special in it's day.
fatboy b said:
Righto.
An international engine of the year award doesn’t mean they don’t go wrong, ‘cos they do.
I didn't claim that but don't think that reliability is synonymous with best either.An international engine of the year award doesn’t mean they don’t go wrong, ‘cos they do.
DukeDickson said:
Aside from the piss on the block F1 special, I wouldn't hold BMW as a particularly special producer of 2l & down engines.
When they can be arsed, and/or the right person is in charge, I'll take the Honda card , though would still like it to be N/A.
That is a good point, to be honest I didn't read the OP very well as I didn't even notice the 2L and down until a second reading. When they can be arsed, and/or the right person is in charge, I'll take the Honda card , though would still like it to be N/A.
Porsche and Mercedes have some special 2.0's at the moment.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff