RE: Everytimer creates 1 Series-based ETA 02

RE: Everytimer creates 1 Series-based ETA 02

Author
Discussion

SuperBaaaad

1,816 posts

219 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
If it was an actual 2002 with lots of [hidden] modern bits in e.g. engine, electrics, safety things - stuff that's good/helpful/makes it faster but which, you can't really see, then maybe. But this looks like a st kit car - the front is bad, but the rear is really, really bad. And the modern interior makes it even worse.

I just don't see who would buy one. Ever.

fernando the frog

298 posts

68 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
Smaller wheels, chrome around the kidney grille and some badges on the rear and it'd look better imo

Lowtimer

4,286 posts

168 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
I'm all for combining the looks of old cars with sympathetic modern mechanical upgrades but this is a complete fail for me. It just doesn't look like an 02, the basic proportions are so wrong.

monzaxjr

549 posts

146 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
Hideous in every way. hurl I've seen a syphilis ridden fanny that was more attractive than this.

tejr

3,105 posts

164 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
I think the only retro kit worth bothering with is the GTO on a Z3 kit - https://www.rcnmag.com/garage/a-rolling-stone

But you either need to keep it badge-less, or keep the BMW badges.

Turbobanana

Original Poster:

6,271 posts

201 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
monzaxjr said:
Hideous in every way. hurl I've seen a syphilis ridden fanny that was more attractive than this.
So, to be clear, you don't like it?

Mike335i

5,005 posts

102 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
I'm going to be one of the few brave ones that likes this, I think the blue one is better than the green, but I like em.

FLUKE

6 posts

212 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
Simply terrible!

C.A.R.

3,967 posts

188 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
Photoshop could have saved these people a fortune.

Could have seen what a mess it would be before actually putting grinder to metal.


matbat

772 posts

245 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
vomit

monzaxjr

549 posts

146 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
Turbobanana said:
monzaxjr said:
Hideous in every way. hurl I've seen a syphilis ridden fanny that was more attractive than this.
So, to be clear, you don't like it?
Does it show? hehe

blue_haddock

3,205 posts

67 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
JMF894 said:
Front's ok but the side and rear don't work. And I would want the interior to feel retro too.
The back end is truly ghastly!

humphra

482 posts

92 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
All I can put is...........WTF yikes

Followed by rofl and redcard
roflthumbup

BFleming

3,606 posts

143 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
CharlieAlphaMike said:
I...errr...quite like it getmecoat
+0.75 (not my contact lens prescription, I couldn't quite give it a +1 for 'me too'). I don't think it's that bad. I suspect it'll be a short-lived low volume (single digits) production run, but there are definitely elements of the car I quite like. I've seen better colours than the ones they've used in these pictures too, in which the rear end doesn't look like diseased genitalia (as brutally described above).
I quite like the E82/E88 shape though, so to think they've performed the 'she devil' transformation on one to make this car seems like a bit of a waste of energy, but I'm sure someone somewhere (probably Bavaria) will buy one.

myhandle

1,187 posts

174 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
monzaxjr said:
Hideous in every way. hurl I've seen a syphilis ridden fanny that was more attractive than this.
Nice! I think it’s quite a fun idea, it’s clearly not remotely meant to be a replica, just a bit of fun, in the same way the Mitsuoka Viewt was not trying to be a Jaguar Mk2, but something jolly and nostalgic. I used to have a 2002 Turbo and I presently have a 2000 CS, so I am a huge fan of this era of BMW but I am ok with this and would even consider having one, precisely because it is not meant to be a replica but a bit of fun. Not in either of those colour schemes though and not with the blacked out trim. Pale yellow, orange, lime green or Chamonix white are the colours , and the chrome needs to be reinstated, the dechroming does not work. Best of luck to them, they are trying to make something different that celebrates an icon, and being a 135i at core will itself be a pretty decent car.

myhandle

1,187 posts

174 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
fernando the frog said:
Smaller wheels, chrome around the kidney grille and some badges on the rear and it'd look better imo
+1, and a less drab and more 60s-70s colour would work wonders.

myhandle

1,187 posts

174 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
Also these awful photos are doing it no favours at all. A quick internet search finds this:

deltashad

6,731 posts

197 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
Oh dear...

Venturist

3,472 posts

195 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
I think it’s fun. Far from a flawless execution, the front fascia is a close copy but the overall car proportions don’t quite fit it so it look so like a messed up copy rather than a homage with its own identity. I’d enjoy seeing it in the flesh though and I’m glad people do stuff like this.

foxbody-87

2,675 posts

166 months

Thursday 10th January 2019
quotequote all
Lolwut