RE: Manual, rear-drive BMW M3 'Pure' rumoured

RE: Manual, rear-drive BMW M3 'Pure' rumoured

Author
Discussion

TWPC

842 posts

162 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
M3 Pure?

Yes please! Why on earth would anyone NOT want BMW to offer it?

Mike335i

5,008 posts

103 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
TWPC said:
M3 Pure?

Yes please! Why on earth would anyone NOT want BMW to offer it?
Because I can't see it being what we want it to be.

We want a purer car focussed on the driving experience for a more reasonable price. A lighter car that is useable as a daily, but without the barriers to involvement. We want steering feel, a slick box, a responsive engine and something that is special at 30mph as well as 130mph, and doesn't cost £60k plus.

What we will get is an inflated price and such low sales that it will be the last manual M car. Or worse, if it sells well it will be used as an excuse to make more ultra exclusive, ultra expensive 'pure' versions (see Porsche and the GT3).

Oh dear, I appear to have become cynical! I hope I am wrong on this ...

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 22nd January 2019
quotequote all
Forgive what is perhaps ignorance, but I thought the entire point of an M3 or M5 was to have a car that was otherwise usable everyday car but with a real animal side. However, if you aim to build a "pure" drivers car you wouldn't dream of starting with a 4 door, McPherson strutted, 1600KG+ saloon on a platform designed to sell profitably for £25k.

I just don't really see where something like this sits between a regular M car and an actual sportscar made with actual sportscar ingredients?

48Valves

1,961 posts

210 months

Tuesday 22nd January 2019
quotequote all
What they really need to offer is an M3 touring.

Amirhussain

11,489 posts

164 months

Tuesday 22nd January 2019
quotequote all
48Valves said:
What they really need to offer is an M3 touring.
That nobody would buy, just like the E61 M5.

Krikkit

26,538 posts

182 months

Tuesday 22nd January 2019
quotequote all
E30M3ZONE said:
48Valves said:
Except the manual box in the E46 M3 was awful.
Completely agree, the manual box effectively ruined the car for me....

Edited by E30M3ZONE on Saturday 19th January 14:38
What was wrong with it? Did the M3 get a CDV?

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

235 months

Tuesday 22nd January 2019
quotequote all
TWPC said:
M3 Pure?

Yes please! Why on earth would anyone NOT want BMW to offer it?
Because it doesn't sound that pure at all. I would however love to be proved wrong...

DanielSan

18,806 posts

168 months

Wednesday 23rd January 2019
quotequote all
Amirhussain said:
That nobody would buy, just like the E61 M5.
Why would you when the RS6 is more usable?

cerb4.5lee

30,724 posts

181 months

Wednesday 23rd January 2019
quotequote all
Amirhussain said:
48Valves said:
What they really need to offer is an M3 touring.
That nobody would buy, just like the E61 M5.
The E46 M3 CSL didn't sell that well when it launched either iirc. BMW punters don't want PURE they want mod cons and comfort, I don't ever remember a BMW being light either. My Z4M still weighed 1485kg and that only had two seats and a fabric roof! laugh

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 23rd January 2019
quotequote all
Suppose it sounds like a sort of Carrera T for the M3 range.

Either way, not getting one as it'll only get nicked around our way.

E65Ross

35,100 posts

213 months

Wednesday 23rd January 2019
quotequote all
richthebike said:
nickfrog said:
slipstream 1985 said:
Until bmw can design proper brakes for their road cars I doubt I will ever buy another again.
Get with the programme grand dad ;-). Even a seven year old M135i comes with 4 pot Brembo and huge discs as std. Managed a few sessions at Spa on stock pads without any problems despite 3:00 lap times.
Nickfrog responded on my behalf on this one. Steel brakes in the F80 are mega for the road. Fine, if you're buying to track then there are ceramics, but I honestly can't see why you'd need anything more than standard steels. Road driving is about being smooth and fast in my view...
For road use they're fine. If you're overheating your M brakes on the public road you're being silly IMO. Or is someone expecting track-spec equipment for road car prices?

cerb4.5lee

30,724 posts

181 months

Wednesday 23rd January 2019
quotequote all
E65Ross said:
richthebike said:
nickfrog said:
slipstream 1985 said:
Until bmw can design proper brakes for their road cars I doubt I will ever buy another again.
Get with the programme grand dad ;-). Even a seven year old M135i comes with 4 pot Brembo and huge discs as std. Managed a few sessions at Spa on stock pads without any problems despite 3:00 lap times.
Nickfrog responded on my behalf on this one. Steel brakes in the F80 are mega for the road. Fine, if you're buying to track then there are ceramics, but I honestly can't see why you'd need anything more than standard steels. Road driving is about being smooth and fast in my view...
For road use they're fine. If you're overheating your M brakes on the public road you're being silly IMO. Or is someone expecting track-spec equipment for road car prices?
That is what I really liked about my Cerbera and it came with AP Racing brakes as standard. My E92 M3 was the more expensive car new...yet it was fitted with the same brakes as a 318d for some reason! hehe They were absolutely garbage, I believe that the more recent M cars do have much better brakes now from what I've read though.

rev-erend

21,421 posts

285 months

Wednesday 23rd January 2019
quotequote all
Cars like the M2 / M3 are a very good compromise everyday car / sports car.

What I cannot understand is why they need to be so heavy.

This move to offer a 'pure' sports model by BMW is hopefully going to address this excessive weight penalty that seems to affect so many modern cars.

1400kg should be the target weight.

Manual box is lighter than a DSG.

What else would you sacrifice - heavy seats, electric motors for everything (seats, windows), Aircon ?

E65Ross

35,100 posts

213 months

Wednesday 23rd January 2019
quotequote all
rev-erend said:
Cars like the M2 / M3 are a very good compromise everyday car / sports car.

What I cannot understand is why they need to be so heavy.

This move to offer a 'pure' sports model by BMW is hopefully going to address this excessive weight penalty that seems to affect so many modern cars.

1400kg should be the target weight.

Manual box is lighter than a DSG.

What else would you sacrifice - heavy seats, electric motors for everything (seats, windows), Aircon ?
Electric windows are now lighter than manual. Air con - sod that.

andyman_2006

726 posts

191 months

Wednesday 23rd January 2019
quotequote all
Lets hope they actually do go ahead and make it, I hope they sell lots!!

But for some time now this has been heading towards the sheep following of 'Autos only' - we are told by most Manufactures this is best, and why would we need a manual when maybe its not for all of us, sure Auto's are great for a big Lux barge, or a daily city driver, and of course the evil emissions and mpg - maybe its essential for that mega quick lap of the 'ring, but not so much for the hardcore car nut or the enthusiast wanting some form of unassisted driver engagement.. so I'll be sticking with all my stick shift cars, in my opinion (and it is just that) the whole new car market is becoming bland, same and boring flooded with MPV rubbish and now all the 'good stuff' is heading down the PDK/DCT/Auto only route, shame - less driver involvement and more heavy tech laden, more safety aided (whatever acronym this forms ACS/TCT/TCS/DSC etc etc) god help us to be actually trusted to drive our cars ourselves, use the skill of driving most of us had to learn, and having proper involvement with the cars.

This sort of sheep following madness just makes the classic/modern classics market look even more appealing to drivers who want to drive their cars and not have them automated, heavy, tech laden, robotised same looking euro boxes doing a zillion mpg, with low emissions (no doubt the actual priority of all this automation) and all forced upon us by our dictators sorry (friends or enemies) over in Europe! in the same way everything 'must have a turbo' or less cyl or god forbid if its a V8, it needs to run in 4 cyl mode most of the time :-( all a bit depressing.

Dont start me on Electric cars...

Sad times if they dont continue to make cars we actually have to drive, have a skill like using a clutch and its control, etc etc, seems driverless cars are getting closer and closer..we have all been warned -embrace manual cars while we still can!

:-(

Andy

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 23rd January 2019
quotequote all
It gets to a point when you can't really save any more weight by taking stuff out. You have to start replacing stuff with lighter stuff. That then gets expensive and people on the internet begin complaining you're getting less for more.

Cars are getting heavier because they are getting bigger. Bigger stuff is heavier shocker.

If you want light weight you need smaller. Smaller cars are based on cheaper models. These are not as nice inside. People then complain about not as nice.

It's a vicious circle!

mcelliott

8,676 posts

182 months

Wednesday 30th January 2019
quotequote all
48Valves said:
cologne2792 said:
mrbarnett said:


And here it is...
Perfect !
Except the manual box in the E46 M3 was awful.
Not the best definitely, awful nope.

julian64

14,317 posts

255 months

Wednesday 30th January 2019
quotequote all
sideways man said:
PaulD86 said:
Ordinarily I'd think this was great news.... OK, to be fair I still think it's a good thing, however, I have yet to drive any BMW with a nice feeling manual gearbox. I'm a big BMW fan but I've found all their manual boxes somewhat unpleasant to use. smile
This.
Driven lots of BMW over the years, Not one has had a decent gearchange
Okay closest two were E39 M5 but slightly hampered by a daft clutch delay valve

850i BMW, underpowered but the gearbox was the best I ever experienced in a BMW.

cerb4.5lee

30,724 posts

181 months

Wednesday 30th January 2019
quotequote all
julian64 said:
850i BMW, underpowered but the gearbox was the best I ever experienced in a BMW.
I've always wanted a 850 CSi and the thought of that lovely V12 mated to a manual gearbox seems like heaven to me.

Onehp

1,617 posts

284 months

Wednesday 30th January 2019
quotequote all
Of course there should be a pure.

Now I would want an estate, xdrive with rear M-diff switchable to rwd, a manual gearbox and a manual handbrake! Estate for family duty, rwd mode for hooning when alone, xdrive for undramatic winter progress during winter with family AND for hooning when alone. Manual box (and clutch) and handbrake necessary for full control. Am I alone? I can only dream...

If it weren't for practicality, I would have kept my finetuned GT86, or would be more interested in the new Z4/Supra, Cayman or if could do with even less luggage space, the A110... Or a tuned MX-5, fun doesn't need to be that expensive...


Edited by Onehp on Wednesday 30th January 22:24