Why can nobody drive in the snow

Why can nobody drive in the snow

Author
Discussion

Onehp

1,617 posts

284 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Onehp said:
4wd ain't better than the tyres it is on,
On equal tyres 4wd will be massively superior in slippery conditions. Anyone claiming otherwise simply isn't versed in 4wd's.
Yes we did this before. I disagree.

4wd cars are involved in higher speeds offs because the drivers didn't notice it was slippery. Common knowledge up here. Both straight on and in turns, the even drive postpones the point where the noob driver realizes there is no grip. (Edit: main assumption being the modern car is equipped with ESP which is the main help for keeping the car on the road. On old school sheds, 4wd does help stability, true).

ABS and Antispin: mash that brake pedal and throttle and let them do their work. A proper ABS system will build and release brake pressure by itself, but it needs input from the driver to tell them they really want to stop, mash it and brake bias doesn't matter. ABS will regulate each individual wheel. At very low speeds ABS stops functioning properly then you should feather off and brake bias comes into play.

Likewise with antispin, to get going you feather off, but once the the clutch is in, peeps lift off the trottle when antispin kicks in, but you should keep your foot down, and the system will see to it you get as far as grip allows.

But my main point is that the tyres do most of the job. 4wd helps you get going but it ends there.

Edited by Onehp on Thursday 24th January 12:05

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
lyonspride said:
This is a contradiction, a 4wd rally car is faster because it's constantly using that 4wd to pull it's way out of and as such accelerate out of corners, where a RWD would be power sliding and a FWD would have to deal with understeer. It's still all about getting power through the wheels, it's buggar all to do with anything else.
Why not rear the detailed answer I gave to you a few posts up... rolleyessmile

Or go and drive a 4wd rally car on a loose surface or speak to people that do. They will be unlikely to agree with you. Plenty of YouTube content to back this up if you want to find something you can watch now.

lyonspride said:
As for all this "modern 4x4" stuff, an old school defender still kicks arse in comparison to a "modern 4x4", because it's lighter and it has narrow tyres which cut right down through the muck to find grip, instead of floating on top of it.
Yes and no.

Defenders aren't always all that light, 1600-1800kg or more. And for many years the standard tyre has been a 265/75R16, so not exactly narrow either. Although you are more likely to find Mud terrains, All terrains or all seasons fitted to a Defender. That and the combination of the 4wd system (as I explained above), are what give them very good abilities in the snow.

On the right tyres however a Discovery Sport or Range Rover Evoque would actually offer some advantages in some areas over the Defender..... Mostly down to the traction control systems they have. While many Defenders have no form of TCS at all and only open axle diffs.

lyonspride said:
Anyone who believes all the 4x4 marketing we get all over the TV from November onwards (and especially after a bit of snow), is delusional.
Maybe so, but stubbornly believing 4wd offers no advantages is equally delusional.


If you don't believe, all I can say is, go and give it a go first hand. Then come back to me biggrin

Car-Matt

1,923 posts

139 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all

RicksAlfas

13,408 posts

245 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Balmoral said:
300, I grasp both your points there, thanks.
If everyone said that, the internet would be much smaller.
biggrin

Car-Matt

1,923 posts

139 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
yonex said:
It really just seems a lot of people don’t care about driving at all?
Correct. 95% of drivers don't ever pay driving techniques more than scant lip service

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Onehp said:
Yes we did this before. I disagree.

4wd cars are involved in higher speeds offs because the drivers didn't notice it was slippery.

Edited by Onehp on Thursday 24th January 12:05
So your whole argument has nothing to do with with the drive system, and is solely aimed at the drivers.

Which simply reinforces the point, 4wd on equal tyres is superior to 2wd in slippery conditions. Unless you want to apply your logic to seat belts too, meaning wearing them must be more dangerous than not, because when people wear them, they drive quicker.... tongue out

CABC

5,589 posts

102 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Onehp said:
300bhp/ton said:
Onehp said:
4wd ain't better than the tyres it is on,
On equal tyres 4wd will be massively superior in slippery conditions. Anyone claiming otherwise simply isn't versed in 4wd's.
Yes we did this before. I disagree.

4wd cars are involved in higher speeds offs because the drivers didn't notice it was slippery. Common knowledge up here. Both straight on and in turns, the even drive postpones the point where the noob driver realizes there is no grip. (Edit: main assumption being the modern car is equipped with ESP which is the main help for keeping the car on the road. On old school sheds, 4wd does help stability, true).

ABS and Antispin: mash that brake pedal and throttle and let them do their work. A proper ABS system will build and release brake pressure by itself, but it needs input from the driver to tell them they really want to stop, mash it and brake bias doesn't matter. ABS will regulate each individual wheel. At very low speeds ABS stops functioning properly then you should feather off and brake bias comes into play.

Likewise with antispin, to get going you feather off, but once the the clutch is in, peeps lift off the trottle when antispin kicks in, but you should keep your foot down, and the system will see to it you get as far as grip allows.

But my main point is that the tyres do most of the job. 4wd helps you get going but it ends there.

Edited by Onehp on Thursday 24th January 12:05
i think you're both right and making different points.
300 is technically correct for carefully driven pick up with locked centre diff.
OneHP also right as 99% of drivers stomp their feet on their SUVs pedals with no feel.

funny how in 20 years living in alps it's normally the suv in the ditch (often GB plates...)

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Car-Matt said:
Can't see it, AutoExpress block adblockers. If it's a dumb 4x4 on summers vs 2wd on winters pointless test. Then all I can say is REREAD the posts above.... and lookup the word "equal" .... lol

wink

ToothbrushMan

1,770 posts

126 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
and dont you just love weathermen who after announcing snow and ice saying "but dont venture out in your car unless your journey is absolutely necessary".

no, my journey is totally unnecessary I just thought I would drive around aimlessly for a bit until I got bored.


Car-Matt

1,923 posts

139 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Car-Matt said:
Can't see it, AutoExpress block adblockers. If it's a dumb 4x4 on summers vs 2wd on winters pointless test. Then all I can say is REREAD the posts above.... and lookup the word "equal" .... lol

wink
Probably best to watch it before being a sarcy twunt, it shows all combos of 4x4/2wd/Summer/Winter and links to a braking test too.

;-)

Sheepshanks

32,806 posts

120 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
yonex said:
The obligatory idiot in a Range Rover was flashing drivers out of the way on the A40, presumably this one day in the South East he could show his cars full potential.
Colleague in Eastern Europe sent me a picture of his RangeRover in a ditch. Straight single carriageway road - he said the car just slipped sideways off the road. He reckons it's because they're heavily cambered and once the car starts going, nothing he could do to stop it. Several other vehicles on the road had done the same thing.

CABC

5,589 posts

102 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Car-Matt said:
300bhp/ton said:
Car-Matt said:
Can't see it, AutoExpress block adblockers. If it's a dumb 4x4 on summers vs 2wd on winters pointless test. Then all I can say is REREAD the posts above.... and lookup the word "equal" .... lol

wink
Probably best to watch it before being a sarcy twunt, it shows all combos of 4x4/2wd/Summer/Winter and links to a braking test too.

;-)
to be fair it is the "usual" comparison. I don't think the Kuga has a locked centre diff. Crossovers drive like FWD cars in cornering and braking (i think**)

Onehp

1,617 posts

284 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Onehp said:
Yes we did this before. I disagree.

4wd cars are involved in higher speeds offs because the drivers didn't notice it was slippery.

Edited by Onehp on Thursday 24th January 12:05
So your whole argument has nothing to do with with the drive system, and is solely aimed at the drivers.

Which simply reinforces the point, 4wd on equal tyres is superior to 2wd in slippery conditions. Unless you want to apply your logic to seat belts too, meaning wearing them must be more dangerous than not, because when people wear them, they drive quicker.... tongue out
We aren't talking about who is winning rallys, we are talking about noob UK drivers crashing or driving into the ditch... In this context, talking about 4wd being 'superior' when the main problem is that its contribution to safety and superior driving in snow is hugely overestimated in the eyes of the general public, and academics actually point to a NEGATIVE contribution to safety.

Equally so, winter tyres actually don't reduce road deaths but that is mostly because people are actually MOVING and getting somewhere wink And their benefits remain hugely underestimated and unknown to the larger public. Too many people 'choose' and pay for 4x4 when INSTEAD they would be much better off with a set of winter tyres. If you get both, good for you but unfortunately this tends to be mutually exclusive for all too many still. Even in Sweden, SUV owners skimp on quality winters, perhaps because they cost so much in 20"...

It's winter in Sweden and I can't wait to have a drive in the new M340i XDRIVE with rear M-diff and all systems switched off... On studded winter tyres of course and on a twisty back road. But in that I don't represent the majority wink

motco

15,966 posts

247 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all





Car-Matt

1,923 posts

139 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
CABC said:
Car-Matt said:
300bhp/ton said:
Car-Matt said:
Can't see it, AutoExpress block adblockers. If it's a dumb 4x4 on summers vs 2wd on winters pointless test. Then all I can say is REREAD the posts above.... and lookup the word "equal" .... lol

wink
Probably best to watch it before being a sarcy twunt, it shows all combos of 4x4/2wd/Summer/Winter and links to a braking test too.

;-)
to be fair it is the "usual" comparison. I don't think the Kuga has a locked centre diff. Crossovers drive like FWD cars in cornering and braking (i think**)
TBF i think its representative of the vast majority of 4x4 cars on the road (300bhp/ton will carry on arguing as he is a landrover enthusiast and therefore will only consider 'proper' 4x4's however these make up a tiny proportion of whats on the roads), and yes the video shows the usual comparison but also shows the other combos too. I made no comment or claims about the results, just shared it for people to see what happens.


Bonefish Blues

26,815 posts

224 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
We had fun in 2010 (IIRC) with our Winter-shod Mk2.5 MX5, running rings around most things, but the schadenfreude was strongest with XC90s, X5s and the like smile

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
The snow always brings out the driving gods. I was taking it steady up a hill when this winter clad tyre car overtook me. It was funny really as the next bend he was in the ditch. Same thing as a Landy in a ditch, but that was ice.

I actually think a lot can drive ok in snow, slow and steady wins the race. But the winter tyres brigade love the 2 days of snow we get so they can statistics there purchases.

rallycross

12,812 posts

238 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
RicksAlfas said:
Balmoral said:
300, I grasp both your points there, thanks.
If everyone said that, the internet would be much smaller.
biggrin
He came out with the same ste last year and the year before the best thing to do is ignore posts about tyres by 300 he’s full of crap and won’t listen to anyone.

Integroo

11,574 posts

86 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Skid pad/pan training should really be part of the driving test.
Driving lessons and tests are sufficiently expensive as is without having to add extra expense to do something that is almost irrelevant to most peoples driving. People should just drive more slowly when it's snowing or even better if there is heavy snow don't drive unless they absolutely have to.

Tired

259 posts

64 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
ToothbrushMan said:
and dont you just love weathermen who after announcing snow and ice saying "but dont venture out in your car unless your journey is absolutely necessary".

no, my journey is totally unnecessary I just thought I would drive around aimlessly for a bit until I got bored.
That's what I do when it snows though. I enjoy it.

As for the 2WD/4WD comparisons with 'all other things being equal', they never are.

Even if you consider a car which is made in 2WD and 4WD flavour, the 4WD one is going to be heavier, which will adversely impact the ability to accelerate, brake, and turn, although may help traction.