RE: Skoda Superb Estate meets Jaguar XF Sportbrake

RE: Skoda Superb Estate meets Jaguar XF Sportbrake

Author
Discussion

Itsallicanafford

2,772 posts

160 months

Saturday 27th April 2019
quotequote all
Both of these are poor choices as company cars, BIK rates would be through the roof...

kambites

67,593 posts

222 months

Saturday 27th April 2019
quotequote all
CDP said:
I don't understand the high lists...
A £38k car for £30k is a "bargain"; a £30k car for £30k is not. Even if they're exactly the same car.

Sixpackpert

4,561 posts

215 months

Saturday 27th April 2019
quotequote all
liner33 said:
Having owned a Skoda Superb and a Jag XF , I would own another Superb , but never another Jag , but agree with the other £38k+ on a Skoda is too much imo but the days of high quality Jags are gone also so I dont think they are good value for money either
This

Panjy

162 posts

147 months

Saturday 27th April 2019
quotequote all
I really like both of them smile
Was seriously considering a Superb Sportline Estate when i bought my current car but in the end decided it was actually TOO big for my needs.
Lovely cars though.
The Jag is obviously a more premium product and the price difference reflects it.
Really can't understand why so many folk choose to buy SUV's over cars like these when they are looking for a practical wagon, the lower, deeper boot alone makes them so much more practical.
They look so much better than their SUV equivalents too.

fatboy b

9,500 posts

217 months

Saturday 27th April 2019
quotequote all
akadk said:
fatboy b said:
akadk said:
The V6 twin turbo diesel XF S makes much more sense with 300PS/700Nm
Not really given the issues with oil dilution they’re having.
Not an issue for the V6, nor the XF for that matter.
Buggered if I’d buy a 300 tdi V6.

Hairymonster

1,430 posts

106 months

Saturday 27th April 2019
quotequote all
fatboy b said:
liner33 said:
Having owned a Skoda Superb and a Jag XF , I would own another Superb , but never another Jag , but agree with the other £38k+ on a Skoda is too much imo but the days of high quality Jags are gone also so I dont think they are good value for money either
Sadly true on the Jags. The XE and new XF have taken a nose-dive on quality.
It was a real eye-opener, getting a 200 mile round-trip in a 16-reg XF 2.0 Diesel. It was cramped in the front and the back, the cabin didn't feel special at all, the infotainment system had a tiny screen and was far from intuitive, judging by the way the car's owner (from new) still swore at it in his 3rd year of ownership. It didn't have the hushed ride quality I thought it would have, the diesel engine was harsh on acceleration - it didn't just feel a step down from the Audi/BMW/Merc triumvirate, it genuinely wasn't as nice a car to be in as the Skoda.

Although I like my Octavia, I have always lusted after a Jag and was really hoping to be wowed by this car and to come away thinking - that's my next car if i can get a decent lease deal. Sadly, it felt nothing special at all. Audi/BMW/Merc have nothing to fear if this is what they're still like.

Accepted the XF-R may be a different animal, though it'll still be cramped. A 520, A6 2.0 and especially an E220 have this thing well and truely beat.

hammo19

5,029 posts

197 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
Sixpackpert said:
This
+1 from me Skoda over Jag every time and yes I’ve owned both as new cars. Main difference for me is Q car image, reliability and dealer attitude/customer engagement



Small Car

877 posts

200 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
I bought a new Superb 280 L&K in Sept 17. £40k list, £32.5k through a broker. Done 18k miles and WBAC does a current valuation of £21k.

Super car, £195 for first service and about 32 mpg, although spread is 24 to 37.

I want to keep it for ever and sell it now for something more exciting, but hope I’ll keep it as it is so good at flying under the radar and eating the miles. The fact I have a Skoda (amongst a range of more stupid cars) really confuses people.

It is quite hard to access the Golf R engine performance though I find; it just doesn’t feel right ragging this quite civilised package around.

fatboy b

9,500 posts

217 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
Hairymonster said:
fatboy b said:
liner33 said:
Having owned a Skoda Superb and a Jag XF , I would own another Superb , but never another Jag , but agree with the other £38k+ on a Skoda is too much imo but the days of high quality Jags are gone also so I dont think they are good value for money either
Sadly true on the Jags. The XE and new XF have taken a nose-dive on quality.
It was a real eye-opener, getting a 200 mile round-trip in a 16-reg XF 2.0 Diesel. It was cramped in the front and the back, the cabin didn't feel special at all, the infotainment system had a tiny screen and was far from intuitive, judging by the way the car's owner (from new) still swore at it in his 3rd year of ownership. It didn't have the hushed ride quality I thought it would have, the diesel engine was harsh on acceleration - it didn't just feel a step down from the Audi/BMW/Merc triumvirate, it genuinely wasn't as nice a car to be in as the Skoda.

Although I like my Octavia, I have always lusted after a Jag and was really hoping to be wowed by this car and to come away thinking - that's my next car if i can get a decent lease deal. Sadly, it felt nothing special at all. Audi/BMW/Merc have nothing to fear if this is what they're still like.

Accepted the XF-R may be a different animal, though it'll still be cramped. A 520, A6 2.0 and especially an E220 have this thing well and truely beat.
The R is a different animal, and the R-S even more so. Sadly nothing like it in the current XF range, so I’ll be keeping my R-S for a while. Streets ahead of the newer XF in terms of quality, and way better than the German offerings.

liner33

10,696 posts

203 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
fatboy b said:
The R is a different animal, and the R-S even more so. Sadly nothing like it in the current XF range, so I’ll be keeping my R-S for a while. Streets ahead of the newer XF in terms of quality, and way better than the German offerings.
Performance wise yes but equipment levels are pretty poor on the xfr and xfr s.

akadk

Original Poster:

1,499 posts

180 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
liner33 said:
fatboy b said:
The R is a different animal, and the R-S even more so. Sadly nothing like it in the current XF range, so I’ll be keeping my R-S for a while. Streets ahead of the newer XF in terms of quality, and way better than the German offerings.
Performance wise yes but equipment levels are pretty poor on the xfr and xfr s.
Such as ?

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
Hairymonster said:
I recently had a lift in an XF saloon - 2.0 diesel. I was looking forward to it as I'd never been in one before. I found it disappointing - low rent cabin, awful entertainment/satnav system, not much legroom front or rear - less than my Octavia, let alone the Superb.

I'd have the Superb every day over the Jag. I'd even have my Octavia over the Jag!
Anyone who buys the Skoda over the XF because it has a better sat nav and more What Car? appeal in the lower dash plastics deserves all of the jumped up econo-car ride and handling they get. Yes the Jaguar is very disappointing in many ways, but the way it feels to drive is beyond reproach.

As others have said though, the 300ps V6 diesel is a much better engine than the heavily boosted four and will elevate the car way above the Skoda. A 5 series or E Class is the same with a 4 pot vs 6 pot; a proper engine matters a lot more to the "premium" feel than stupid toys and fripperies.

I'd buy a 530d hehe

Edited by dme123 on Sunday 28th April 12:14

liner33

10,696 posts

203 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
akadk said:
liner33 said:
fatboy b said:
The R is a different animal, and the R-S even more so. Sadly nothing like it in the current XF range, so I’ll be keeping my R-S for a while. Streets ahead of the newer XF in terms of quality, and way better than the German offerings.
Performance wise yes but equipment levels are pretty poor on the xfr and xfr s.
Such as ?
sat nav , audio, lights, climate control, basic controls only switched though touch screen, lane guidance , sign recognition, auto park

Fittster

20,120 posts

214 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
I don't get this Q Car, 'Flying under the radar' view.

Does the Skoda avoid speed cameras? No.

Does the traffic miraculously part when a Skoda approaches? No.

Having bland styling isn't really a plus point.

silentbrown

8,857 posts

117 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
silentbrown said:
Which, the 17% figure? That's just ballpark based on one broker, but by the time you've added metallic paint and a couple of other bits, 17% of list price would be pretty close to £9K..
Don't quite understand the question, but it was main dealer: high spec sportbrake, 300ps AWD: 51k to 42k
Cheers. I think we're saying the same thing! That's about 17-18% discount off list. The top Superb deals work out a little better at 20-21% after finance contributions, so there's still a £10K+ price difference.

There's also pretty major differences in standard spec between the two. Sportline Plus has stuff like keyless entry, electric/memory seats, 19" wheels, adaptive cruise, blind spot warning, all of which seem to be extra on the R Sport.

I'd be very curious about the actual "list price as tested" of the two cars. I wouldn't be surprised if the XF is close to £60K, given there's around £5K of options (wheels, lights, veneer, dash, black pack etc..) immediately visible in the shots.




fatboy b

9,500 posts

217 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
liner33 said:
akadk said:
liner33 said:
fatboy b said:
The R is a different animal, and the R-S even more so. Sadly nothing like it in the current XF range, so I’ll be keeping my R-S for a while. Streets ahead of the newer XF in terms of quality, and way better than the German offerings.
Performance wise yes but equipment levels are pretty poor on the xfr and xfr s.
Such as ?
sat nav , audio, lights, climate control, basic controls only switched though touch screen, lane guidance , sign recognition, auto park
Any car I drive with lane guidance gets it turned off. Sat nav is better than the one in my 2018 Mini (which is a BMW one). Audio isn’t as good as the earlier ones granted, but still pretty good. Sign recognition is hit and miss in any car I’ve driven with it. Lights are poor - yes. Climate works fine. Having switches in the touch screen makes for an uncluttered dash. Auto park is for pussies.

I still prefer it to anything new from Germany.

ST150HB

446 posts

150 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
For me the Jag wins hands down. The only thing is, as a current XF Sportbrake owner, it has averaged at least one visit per month to the dealership over the past 2 years for warranty and work and is currently back there having had a major electrical fault. Unfortunately my car will b emoved on in the near future and i'll be going back to the boring, reliable German/Czech folk.

fatboy b

9,500 posts

217 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
ST150HB said:
For me the Jag wins hands down. The only thing is, as a current XF Sportbrake owner, it has averaged at least one visit per month to the dealership over the past 2 years for warranty and work and is currently back there having had a major electrical fault. Unfortunately my car will b emoved on in the near future and i'll be going back to the boring, reliable German/Czech folk.
Germans aren’t any better. Our Golf has been in once a month in our 3-year ownership. Worst car I’ve experienced. My past German cars were warranty queens too.

WJNB

2,637 posts

162 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
Forgive the anticipated & predictable observation by there is still the semblance of stigma when it comes to Skoda. It just doesn't pass muster in the executive/directors car parks or on the drives of middle-class neo-Georgian housing estates.
As an owner you would forever feel the need to explain & justify buying one over a premium brand & we all know the phrase 'he who protesteth too much ......"
Let Skoda sell to Plod, taxi owners & those without the remotest interest in cars & driving, but I wish they would stop trying to be something they 'ain't.

f1nn

2,693 posts

193 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
Both hamstrung in my opinion.

The Skoda, despite it’s numerous attributes, has found itself in an expensive niche (tax issues for a company car user, wrong badge for a private individual) and although I can see the appeal, I just wouldn’t part with my own money for one.

The Jaguar. Reliability. I know 6 people who own, or have owned JLR products less than 4 years old. Each of them have had, or are having numerous quality issues that JLR/ have seemed incapable of dealing with which has resulted in two rejected vehicles (one of which was on its third engine at less than 6k miles from new) two owners who have sold earlier to jump into another manufacturers cars, and two more who are looking to change.

Even if I liked any of the products that JLR make, which I don’t, the above would put me off owning one.