RE: Porsche 911 Speedster: Driven

RE: Porsche 911 Speedster: Driven

Author
Discussion

frayz

2,629 posts

159 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
Coming from a total Porsche fanboy... it just doesnt do it for me,


im gonna say it.

Its ugly...



There, i said it.

I'll take a GT3 touring please biggrin

MX6

5,983 posts

213 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
It sounds like quite a driving machine with the GT3 guts in it, with the weather being so fine here a scoot about in one of these seems very appealing at the moment.

I've always really liked the looks of the 991, and while I think it does look significantly better as a tin top, the somewhat hunchbacked Speedster still looks purposeful and fun.

That is quite a shocking price tag to me, but I guess it can easily be justified if they sell them all, supply and demand, etc. Plus factor in the investment aspect and perhaps the maths start to make a bit more sence for some.

j90gta

563 posts

134 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
Digga said:
Were I after a Porsche I could take the roof off of, it would still be the Boxster Spyder.


£75 K gets you 396 bhp and a car that is a much more cohesive design. It's probably not much slower either. The 991 just looks so fat and bloated. The only 911 that I've ever driven was a 1974 3.0 RS. Modern 911s just don't do it for me.

mersontheperson

701 posts

165 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
There was also a 964 Speedster with the wider turbo body, that was a looker imo

Arsecati

2,309 posts

117 months

Thursday 16th May 2019
quotequote all
There's enough been said about the writers style by now, for me to add any more to it. Needless to say, I pretty much now just look at the pictures and read the comments when I see the writers name at the top of the article. Such a pity - so unnecessary.

bobo

1,702 posts

278 months

Thursday 16th May 2019
quotequote all
jesus that is hideous .... fact of the matter is the 991 aint no pretty or small thing.

grafting on a shell of what looks like a scarab beetle to cover the rear seats frankly does the thing zero favours.

im sure it will sell like hot cakes.

Digga

40,317 posts

283 months

Thursday 16th May 2019
quotequote all
j90gta said:
Digga said:
Were I after a Porsche I could take the roof off of, it would still be the Boxster Spyder.


£75 K gets you 396 bhp and a car that is a much more cohesive design. It's probably not much slower either. The 991 just looks so fat and bloated. The only 911 that I've ever driven was a 1974 3.0 RS. Modern 911s just don't do it for me.
I have a mate who has a GT3 and a Spyder, because they're both very different cars and each is excellent in it's own right.

Boxster Spyder and an original, side-by-side at PEC Silverstone:

miniman

24,950 posts

262 months

Thursday 16th May 2019
quotequote all
Discombobulating?

Good grief.

UmpaLoompa

1,789 posts

161 months

Thursday 16th May 2019
quotequote all
Great car.

Dreadful review.

I thought Cackett had been 'managed out' of writing front page articles, but apparently not...

MX6

5,983 posts

213 months

Thursday 16th May 2019
quotequote all
I don't really get why some readers don't like the writing style, perhaps a bit overly serious about such things? I found it a decent read and like a less conventional word use and an interesting turn of phrase here and there.

Oily76

186 posts

111 months

Thursday 16th May 2019
quotequote all
Arsecati said:
There's enough been said about the writers style by now, for me to add any more to it. Needless to say, I pretty much now just look at the pictures and read the comments when I see the writers name at the top of the article. Such a pity - so unnecessary.
You come down here to read these moaning comments? The prose may be a bit flowery at times but at least it's not bloody miserable negativity!

Oily76

186 posts

111 months

Thursday 16th May 2019
quotequote all
Oily76 said:
You come down here to read these moaning comments? The prose may be a bit flowery at times but at least it's not bloody miserable negativity!
I should say I find the Speedster incredibly attractive and I'd do terrible things to have one. The price seems sensible to me - not sure why they don't charge more for the GT cars seeing as the market clearly supports a higher valuation.

FerrariGuy007

97 posts

94 months

Thursday 16th May 2019
quotequote all
j90gta said:
Digga said:
Were I after a Porsche I could take the roof off of, it would still be the Boxster Spyder.


£75 K gets you 396 bhp and a car that is a much more cohesive design. It's probably not much slower either. The 991 just looks so fat and bloated. The only 911 that I've ever driven was a 1974 3.0 RS. Modern 911s just don't do it for me.
Back looks ok but the front? Not so much with the fugly alien headlights.

Macboy

739 posts

205 months

Friday 17th May 2019
quotequote all
This may be the first/last/only time I quote Clarkson or refer to a phrase of his, such is my general distain of his opinions, but his comments about the Chrysler Crossfire Coupe looks and the reminiscence to a defecating canine could definitely be made about the monstrous and misshapen back end on the Speedster. As a former owner and lover of most things 911 this is not a win in my eyes.

WJNB

2,637 posts

161 months

Sunday 19th May 2019
quotequote all
From the rear three quarter view it could be a van. Dreadful ugly thing but there are enough stupid people who will buy it as Porsche are well aware, meaning they get the last laugh.

thelostboy

4,569 posts

225 months

Monday 20th May 2019
quotequote all
I saw the concept at Goodwood and wondered what the fuss was about. Love the GT3s looks (although appreciate they are getting a bit too big these days), but hate the Speedster. Ungainly.