RE: Porsche Boxster S (986) | Spotted

RE: Porsche Boxster S (986) | Spotted

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 26th May 2019
quotequote all
philw696 said:
Just bought an 05 987 3.2 S and blown away by its performance and handling along with build quality after previously owning Italian motors I should have bought one years ago.
Maserati all the way Phil

Mantis1964

26 posts

122 months

Sunday 26th May 2019
quotequote all
I have a 2001 S. I'm reasonably handy with the spanners so thought I could run it on a budget. My advice would be to not buy into Porsche unless you can afford the repairs. Done around 70,000 miles and it's just one thing after the other. Don't be fooled into the pathetic stereotype that German engineering will see you through. Your welcome

Sebastian Tombs

2,044 posts

192 months

Sunday 26th May 2019
quotequote all
Had one, and hated it, as while it was fast and went round corners well it was just too efficient, soulless and no fun at legal speeds, and only rewarded you if you were driving like a tit. Most of the time it felt very ordinary indeed. It was also unreliable and the interior was cheap, brittle and nasty. It put me off Porsches completely to be honest.

I replaced it with an Aston Martin DB9 which is a whole other level of engineering (and performance) by comparison and makes me feel wonderful every time I get in it.

WhiteBaron

1,394 posts

226 months

Sunday 26th May 2019
quotequote all
Sebastian Tombs said:
Had one, and hated it, as while it was fast and went round corners well it was just too efficient, soulless and no fun at legal speeds, and only rewarded you if you were driving like a tit. Most of the time it felt very ordinary indeed. It was also unreliable and the interior was cheap, brittle and nasty. It put me off Porsches completely to be honest.

I replaced it with an Aston Martin DB9 which is a whole other level of engineering (and performance) by comparison and makes me feel wonderful every time I get in it.
Can you post a link to the 5k DB9 please.... or 10k?

Jamescrs

4,479 posts

65 months

Sunday 26th May 2019
quotequote all
Sebastian Tombs said:
Had one, and hated it, as while it was fast and went round corners well it was just too efficient, soulless and no fun at legal speeds, and only rewarded you if you were driving like a tit. Most of the time it felt very ordinary indeed. It was also unreliable and the interior was cheap, brittle and nasty. It put me off Porsches completely to be honest.

I replaced it with an Aston Martin DB9 which is a whole other level of engineering (and performance) by comparison and makes me feel wonderful every time I get in it.
Of course the DB9 is a better car, hardly a fair comparison, either new Vs new or used Vs used the DB9 is significant cantly more expensive and not the same market as a Boxster

greenarrow

3,592 posts

117 months

Sunday 26th May 2019
quotequote all
I've felt for a while that we will look back one day at these cheap Boxsters and wonder what value they were! I remember doing the same with the 944 some years ago and now they have finally climbed In value so that a 944 S2 is much more money than the newer Boxster S. Compared with other stuff around now from that vintage, 5K is amazing.

48k

13,081 posts

148 months

Sunday 26th May 2019
quotequote all
Loz986 said:
I’ve had 5 986s now and the 4th is never leaving my stable. Great value for those who enjoy fast B road scratching in a superbly balanced sports car that costs less than a half decent wrist watch.
vomit

schmalex

13,616 posts

206 months

Sunday 26th May 2019
quotequote all
Ursicles said:
Recently bought a 53 plate S for £5k and it's brilliant - great on A and B roads with the hood down.

It's a pretty strong car too and it went straight to northway start buying for a proper going over and ask it needs was CV joints doing smile

It's a car that should keep its money if nothing else.
Ray Northway used to look after my 986S. There is nothing he and his team don’t know about Porsches

Edited by schmalex on Sunday 26th May 20:20

ellisd82

685 posts

208 months

Sunday 26th May 2019
quotequote all
As a Boxster S owner, I can say that this is a steal! Mine has done 67K but the spec is not as good as this! Although mine does have a new hood with Glass upgrade.
Well worth the money, someone is going to get a bargain!

FredBasset

295 posts

227 months

Sunday 26th May 2019
quotequote all
We have a 2003 in the garage with 27k on it, it's a fantastic car. Love it to bits even though it shares garage space with a 991 GT3.

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 26th May 2019
quotequote all
I think with the numbers made and the high survival rate (despite the issues they have), there will be plenty to choose from. Not that that doesn't make it a 'classic' but I don't think prices will firm up as much because of it.

p4ulfi5h3r

1 posts

159 months

Sunday 26th May 2019
quotequote all
I've been using a 1998 Boxster as my daily driver for 2 years and putting nearly 50k miles on it I can't fault it . It puts a smile on my face every time I drive it. I think it might be a keeper.

briancorish

186 posts

184 months

Sunday 26th May 2019
quotequote all
Jamescrs said:
Sebastian Tombs said:
Had one, and hated it, as while it was fast and went round corners well it was just too efficient, soulless and no fun at legal speeds, and only rewarded you if you were driving like a tit. Most of the time it felt very ordinary indeed. It was also unreliable and the interior was cheap, brittle and nasty. It put me off Porsches completely to be honest.

I replaced it with an Aston Martin DB9 which is a whole other level of engineering (and performance) by comparison and makes me feel wonderful every time I get in it.
Of course the DB9 is a better car, hardly a fair comparison, either new Vs new or used Vs used the DB9 is significant cantly more expensive and not the same market as a Boxster
I'm not so sure the DB9 is a better car, more character, yes, more beautiful absolutely, better engineered/built? not a chance, I don't know many DB9 drivers that don't have to reset/fix a warning light at least once every few weeks. For the things that matter on a drive on a nice twisty B road, on a sunny day the Boxster runs rings around it. More money does not equal more fun.

DaveEvs

282 posts

102 months

Sunday 26th May 2019
quotequote all
Oh Yikes - it’s under an hour from me!

Whoever buys this is in for a treat on the way home. Splendid roads. Just make sure to leave after 7pm for most enjoyment.

manracer

1,544 posts

97 months

Sunday 26th May 2019
quotequote all
I had a 53 plate boxster S in 2012 for 9b months before IMS paranoia got the better of me.

Lovely spec, careers wheels, Bose, lapiz with black leather etc, paid 7.5k for it, added 10'000 miles and sold it for 8250.

Should of kept it.

NAnut

52 posts

194 months

Monday 27th May 2019
quotequote all
I had a '99 S, bought in 2012 with 100k on the clock.
My first sports car and what a car, simply fantastic. I even made money when I sold it, probably the only car I ever did, but after spending lots and lots on it!

Ended up selling and replacing it with a first shape Z4 3.0si Sport Coupe, which had a huge boot, and was easier to work on, it was a good, fun car but didnt match the driving experience, gearchange, ride, steering or brakes of the Boxster S though.

Theres a reason people own more than one of these, and I can see myself owning another at some point. They're much more dependable than people who've never owned one would have you believe. If it had more luggage space I'd probably still have it!

It would make an ideal 3rd car for me, if I had a more understanding wife that is.

ianwayne

6,292 posts

268 months

Monday 27th May 2019
quotequote all
I recently bought a 2.7 and it is on 'classic' insurance at 19 years old. Looking at the pictures of that car, somebody spent a few hundred quid on the later front lamps with clear indicator covers, but left the side lamps orange (?). They can be changed for £30 ish to match. And it isn't silver......

Even confused.com value the car at £4900 so with the work done, I think that car is great value. It had advisories for rear ARB bushes at the MoT in Feb but that's not a catastrophe.

Any creaking or knocks from the suspension will be the bushes in the arms and unless you go copy or used, they are very pricey. I like the fact the front and rear suspension parts are all aluminium alloy, and on a galvanized body. smile

coldel

7,868 posts

146 months

Monday 27th May 2019
quotequote all
Classic insurance is just language insurance companies use to attract business, your 19 year old or 16 year old car is not officially a classic. That comes at 40 years if you want to throw the word official at it as the article incorrectly does. 25 years is nothing to do with officially being a classic.

Anyway, went out in a mates Boxster when we were doing a road trip in Europe and it was a glorious car to be in, great handling, open top in the sun, brilliant stuff. Would I buy one? Not a chance...the bills in general are very much what you would expect of a 'supercar' without it actually being one. My mate had a £2k service and has easily spent half the value of the car in maintenance and repairs in just a couple of years.

ianwayne

6,292 posts

268 months

Monday 27th May 2019
quotequote all
I know it's not 'officially' a classic. I've had what's called 'classic' insurance on cars as little as 6 years old, it depends on the make. It's what insurance companies and brokers will accept to give you a guaranteed value if the worst should happen, without using any NCD built up, which you can use on your every-day car. It should perhaps be called 'guaranteed value' insurance but it's easier for the companies to bandy about the term 'classic.' For instance, Footman James will insure a TVR as a 'classic' at 20 years old but a Porsche at only 10. It is arbitrary and up to the underwriters.

The age is irrelevant, I was agreeing with the statements above about it being nonsense in the article to suggest it's hard and fast at 25 years old.

beanoir

1,327 posts

195 months

Monday 27th May 2019
quotequote all
Sebastian Tombs said:
Had one, and hated it, as while it was fast and went round corners well it was just too efficient, soulless and no fun at legal speeds, and only rewarded you if you were driving like a tit. Most of the time it felt very ordinary indeed. It was also unreliable and the interior was cheap, brittle and nasty. It put me off Porsches completely to be honest.

I replaced it with an Aston Martin DB9 which is a whole other level of engineering (and performance) by comparison and makes me feel wonderful every time I get in it.
“A whole other level of engineering”

HA HA HA HAAAAA!!!

Hardly worth comparing a £100k old man GT car with a £40k sports car now is it, come on.