RE: Shed of the Week | Peugeot 205 CJ

RE: Shed of the Week | Peugeot 205 CJ

Author
Discussion

cheesesliceking

1,571 posts

240 months

Friday 7th June 2019
quotequote all
Billy_Whizzzz said:
What a sweet little thing for the price of little more than a bag of sweets.
  • cringe *

WJNB

2,637 posts

161 months

Friday 7th June 2019
quotequote all
Dinky little French thing that no normal man would NEVER EVER want to be seen driving.

Tuvra

7,921 posts

225 months

Friday 7th June 2019
quotequote all
Can't believe people are cooing over this crap - I bet the same people would slate Peugeot if they said they they were making a new 208 Cabrio. I wonder if these mad people will we be cooing over 206cc's in ten years time? hehe

I'd rather a MK1 Ford KA than that crap - I guess I'm trying to say that it isn't for me boxedin

A1VDY

3,575 posts

127 months

Friday 7th June 2019
quotequote all
cheesesliceking said:
Billy_Whizzzz said:
What a sweet little thing for the price of little more than a bag of sweets.
  • cringe *
Exactly.. what kind of ponce writes stuff like this??



A1VDY

3,575 posts

127 months

Friday 7th June 2019
quotequote all
Tuvra said:
Can't believe people are cooing over this crap - I bet the same people would slate Peugeot if they said they they were making a new 208 Cabrio. I wonder if these mad people will we be cooing over 206cc's in ten years time? hehe

I'd rather a MK1 Ford KA than that crap - I guess I'm trying to say that it isn't for me boxedin
Spot on...any Peugeot of this era especially the 205 were and still are dog turd like. This particular st heap has got to be one of the least desirable French cars ever..

Blackpuddin

16,522 posts

205 months

Friday 7th June 2019
quotequote all
I'd lay good money on you never having driven one.

Tuvra

7,921 posts

225 months

Friday 7th June 2019
quotequote all
Blackpuddin said:
I'd lay good money on you never having driven one.
You wouldn't catch me dead in one mate. Dreadful thing.

northyorksclassic

5 posts

81 months

Friday 7th June 2019
quotequote all
Bad timing! sold mine today for a grand with a years mot and now see this!, good news for the buyer though.great little cars

mrmotorhome

107 posts

142 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
What a great little thing for cheap summer fan.
Had three CTIs back in the day, two of them from new, but the 1.6 was always 115bhp (not 105 as stated). Last CTis were 1.9 but with less power/more torque than the 1.6 - same engine as Gentry. Power steering was a nice option on the late ones but the power hood added complication for the sake of it. And structural integrity was as good as anything that started life designed as a tin-top. Softer suspension than GTI made sure it didn't rattle too much!
If you don't love these cars you've clearly never ever driven one... The 205 was Peugeot at its best and Pininfarina did a superb job with the cabrio, just as they had with the 403, 404, 204, 304, 504.

J4CKO

41,560 posts

200 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
WJNB said:
Dinky little French thing that no normal man would NEVER EVER want to be seen driving.
I would be quite happy to drive it, sounds like a few others are.

aaron_2000

5,407 posts

83 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
A1VDY said:
Spot on...any Peugeot of this era especially the 205 were and still are dog turd like.
The 205, 309 and 405 were notoriously bad cars. Often slated for their lacklustre styling, poor driving experience and lack of trim levels. The Nova, Astra and Cavalier were better in every way. Don't get me started on the GTI/MI16's. Sure they had an alright bodykit on them, but they couldn't hold a candle to the likes of the XR2, MG Metro, Cavalier SRI, Escort XR3i and the infamously smooth and dynamic XR2i. Build quality was awful too. I see loads of 80's Peugeots that only make it to around 250k before they need work. Richard Attwood barely got 415k out of his original clutch. A Sierra or Montego clutch would easily make it to 800k, although that's a guess because I've never seen a Sierra or Montego over about 120k, probably because they're cherished too much.

AC43

11,486 posts

208 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
aaron_2000 said:
A1VDY said:
Spot on...any Peugeot of this era especially the 205 were and still are dog turd like.
The 205, 309 and 405 were notoriously bad cars. Often slated for their lacklustre styling, poor driving experience and lack of trim levels. The Nova, Astra and Cavalier were better in every way. Don't get me started on the GTI/MI16's. Sure they had an alright bodykit on them, but they couldn't hold a candle to the likes of the XR2, MG Metro, Cavalier SRI, Escort XR3i and the infamously smooth and dynamic XR2i. Build quality was awful too. I see loads of 80's Peugeots that only make it to around 250k before they need work. Richard Attwood barely got 415k out of his original clutch. A Sierra or Montego clutch would easily make it to 800k, although that's a guess because I've never seen a Sierra or Montego over about 120k, probably because they're cherished too much.
LOL.

I'm not a big fan of the chop top 205 but, as I've said in other threads, I really liked the 205 1.6 & 1.9 I drove back in the day and also the 405 which was a great drive.

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
aaron_2000 said:
The 205, 309 and 405 were notoriously bad cars...
Took me a minute! To add, they used Pinninfarina - literally the worst stylists you could find.

mrmotorhome

107 posts

142 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
Read any road test of the era and the 205 and 405 won every time, as did the 309 in GTI form.
As for Pininfarina, the stylist of every one of the most beautiful cars ever made (most Ferraris until the recent ugly stuff)...
Most mass-produced rivals were junk, as shown by classic values today,

Billy_Whizzzz

Original Poster:

2,007 posts

143 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
A1VDY said:
cheesesliceking said:
Billy_Whizzzz said:
What a sweet little thing for the price of little more than a bag of sweets.
  • cringe *
Exactly.. what kind of ponce writes stuff like this??

People that want to annoy people like you.

white_goodman

4,042 posts

191 months

Monday 10th June 2019
quotequote all
Not getting the hate for this one. As a former 205 GTi owner, the Peugeot 205 has to be one of the best small hatches ever made. Willing engines, good fuel economy, a nice ride and handling compromise, pretty Pininfarina styling, excellent visibility and unlike the Citroen AX and later 106/Saxo, not a stupidly cramped and offset pedal box, so actually very comfortable. Despite being a small car, I always found it suprisingly "Tardis-like" too. It could accommodate 4 adults comfortably and had a reasonable-sized boot too. It was the mk7/8 Fiesta of its day but I still find the Fiesta surprisingly cramped.

Granted, 80s French build quality wasn't the best but they were very rust-resistant, so there are still a surprising amount around compared to other vehicles of that era and they were mechanically very strong. Mine had done 170,000 hard-driven miles and was still going strong when I wrote it off!

Unlike today, hatchback/saloon-based convertibles were pretty cool in the 80s (bear in mind that the MX5 hadn't been invented yet) and offered fairly affordable and yet practical fun. I went for the GTi hardtop because it was a bit stiffer, cheaper to buy and quicker but I always though the convertibles were one of the nicer-looking 80s convertibles and would still be fun to trundle around in today. The lady who gave me a lift to my work experience in the mid-90s had a CJ in the colour scheme below. It was a pretty little thing and felt, perky enough (it was a pretty light car after all and 205s had pretty short gearing) and that little 205 was also probably my first "topless" experience and I've liked convertibles since! Good SOTW and something a little bit different to the usual German barges.


torqueischeap

12 posts

148 months

Monday 10th June 2019
quotequote all
aaron_2000 said:
A1VDY said:
Spot on...any Peugeot of this era especially the 205 were and still are dog turd like.
The 205, 309 and 405 were notoriously bad cars. Often slated for their lacklustre styling, poor driving experience and lack of trim levels. The Nova, Astra and Cavalier were better in every way. Don't get me started on the GTI/MI16's. Sure they had an alright bodykit on them, but they couldn't hold a candle to the likes of the XR2, MG Metro, Cavalier SRI, Escort XR3i and the infamously smooth and dynamic XR2i. Build quality was awful too. I see loads of 80's Peugeots that only make it to around 250k before they need work. Richard Attwood barely got 415k out of his original clutch. A Sierra or Montego clutch would easily make it to 800k, although that's a guess because I've never seen a Sierra or Montego over about 120k, probably because they're cherished too much.
Yes, those dog turd Peugeots, give me some Ford or BL offering anyday, a lovely Maestro Vanden Plas

torqueischeap

12 posts

148 months

Monday 10th June 2019
quotequote all
mrmotorhome said:
What a great little thing for cheap summer fan.
Had three CTIs back in the day, two of them from new, but the 1.6 was always 115bhp (not 105 as stated). Last CTis were 1.9 but with less power/more torque than the 1.6 - same engine as Gentry. Power steering was a nice option on the late ones but the power hood added complication for the sake of it. And structural integrity was as good as anything that started life designed as a tin-top. Softer suspension than GTI made sure it didn't rattle too much!
If you don't love these cars you've clearly never ever driven one... The 205 was Peugeot at its best and Pininfarina did a superb job with the cabrio, just as they had with the 403, 404, 204, 304, 504.
Early 1.6 GTis were in fact 105bhp, and 115bhp after 1988/9 I believe

s m

23,225 posts

203 months

Monday 10th June 2019
quotequote all
torqueischeap said:
mrmotorhome said:
What a great little thing for cheap summer fan.
Had three CTIs back in the day, two of them from new, but the 1.6 was always 115bhp (not 105 as stated). Last CTis were 1.9 but with less power/more torque than the 1.6 - same engine as Gentry. Power steering was a nice option on the late ones but the power hood added complication for the sake of it. And structural integrity was as good as anything that started life designed as a tin-top. Softer suspension than GTI made sure it didn't rattle too much!
If you don't love these cars you've clearly never ever driven one... The 205 was Peugeot at its best and Pininfarina did a superb job with the cabrio, just as they had with the 403, 404, 204, 304, 504.
Early 1.6 GTis were in fact 105bhp, and 115bhp after 1988/9 I believe
I think mrmotorhome is on about the CTi though. They were introduced into UK with a 1.6 115bhp although you are correct that the early GTis were 105bhp 1.6 - the 115bhp 1.6 came in around mid 86


MrScrot

77 posts

162 months

Tuesday 11th June 2019
quotequote all
I had a CTi before I had a GTi.

CTi was about 100kg heavier than the GTi and though I wouldn't say it was slow, it was compromised by the extra weight. I don't know what a lower powered engine would be like in a cabrio 205, but getting over the hill on a motorway would take some extra welly. The maintenance for the roof was a pain in the butt.

That said, for normal town driving the CTi (roof down) was as fun as the GTi.