RE: Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S vs. Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid

RE: Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S vs. Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid

Author
Discussion

Terminator X

15,080 posts

204 months

Monday 10th June 2019
quotequote all
madcal said:
Ignoring the quality or otherwise of the writing...

That Porsche is one ugly machine.

The Merc looks great.

But at £150k-ish I fear there will not be so many takers. I will stick with my RS6 and it's imminent like-for-like replacement which will be around £50k less and 99% of the performance.
Tbf the next RS6 must be 650hp so probably more performance for less £'s / lb's!

TX.

poo at Paul's

14,147 posts

175 months

Monday 10th June 2019
quotequote all
I'd have the Porsche.

Digger

14,669 posts

191 months

Monday 10th June 2019
quotequote all
I don’t know, but after myriad complaints I get the impression that when he does decide to write in this “style” . . . it’s for entirely this response.

Odd.

andytheyank

2 posts

146 months

Monday 17th June 2019
quotequote all
I really wish this writer was kept away from cars. Utterly impossible to follow his rantings and ravings. Go away.

Adam B

27,247 posts

254 months

Wednesday 26th June 2019
quotequote all
I love the look of the Panny GT - the saloon rear is fugly but the estate looks great. A standard turbo S though please

The Merc is odd looking and has that awful grille from the AMG GTR - pass