RE: BAC launches new Mono R
Discussion
treeroy said:
Ariel Atom V8 is not a bike engine.
Well it sort of is - the heads were lifted straight from the Hayabusa with minimal modification and consequently the block owed most of its dimensions to the 'busa as well. There's a few V8s constructed in similar ways and of course they are not bike engines in that the engine itself was never actually in a bike, but the design still owes an awful lot to the donor unit. Fabulous unit either way.
kambites said:
Well it sort of is - the heads were lifted straight from the Hayabusa with minimal modification and consequently the block owed most of its dimensions to the 'busa as well. There's a few V8s constructed in similar ways and of course they are not bike engines in that the engine itself was never actually in a bike, but the design still owes an awful lot to the donor unit.
Fabulous unit either way.
I did not know that, thank you.Fabulous unit either way.
treeroy said:
RumbleOfThunder said:
Can we stop naming stty bike engines please.
Ariel Atom V8 is not a bike engine.Attention PH - Can we stop the pointless attempts to one up each other in the knowledge stakes. It makes every thread a pissing contest. Correcting people when necessary is fine but needlessly seeking out comments to misinterpret them for the sake of a quick win is growing tiresome
RumbleOfThunder said:
Attention PH - Can we stop the pointless attempts to one up each other in the knowledge stakes. It makes every thread a pissing contest. Correcting people when necessary is fine but needlessly seeking out comments to misinterpret them for the sake of a quick win is growing tiresome
It's not a comment, it's the frigging headline on the story! isaldiri said:
RumbleOfThunder said:
Highly developed aero. Carbon construction. The R&D cost alone compared to a Caterham must be huge.
The mono only has cf panels. It does not have a carbon fibre monocoque unlike say the KTM X bow.RumbleOfThunder said:
Attention PH - Can we stop the pointless attempts to one up each other in the knowledge stakes. It makes every thread a pissing contest. Correcting people when necessary is fine but needlessly seeking out comments to misinterpret them for the sake of a quick win is growing tiresome
RumbleOfThunder said:
Thanks for that revelation, Gordon Murray.
RumbleOfThunder said:
Thanks, Adrian Newey. I didn't say it had a carbon monocoque.
Christ your'e grumpy today...U ok hun?
RumbleOfThunder said:
Thanks, Adrian Newey. I didn't say it had a carbon monocoque.
But carbon construction would generally be a term used to describe a composite chassis car rather than a space frame. It's also not got any aero to speak of, developed or otherwise, beyond some basic anti lift stuff. Mono is a zero downforce car by design. Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff