RE: Lotus unveils 2000hp, £2m Evija

RE: Lotus unveils 2000hp, £2m Evija

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
Donkey Apple said:
Digga said:
Ergo, the cost of manufacturing as contrast to mainstream, high volume cars is irrelevant because the pricing mechanics are from two different planets.
making 75 cars is, effectively, and from the perspective of economies of scale and production, little different to making a one-off.

I work with guys who've spent decades in high-volume automotive supply chain engineering and it is hard to get the layman to understand quite how this works.
That IMO neatly encapsulates the pickle which new-TVR seems to have got into.

Digga

40,352 posts

284 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
rockin said:
Donkey Apple said:
Digga said:
Ergo, the cost of manufacturing as contrast to mainstream, high volume cars is irrelevant because the pricing mechanics are from two different planets.
making 75 cars is, effectively, and from the perspective of economies of scale and production, little different to making a one-off.

I work with guys who've spent decades in high-volume automotive supply chain engineering and it is hard to get the layman to understand quite how this works.
That IMO neatly encapsulates the pickle which new-TVR seems to have got into.
When you are doing one's or two's, it is often surprisingly easy to get suppliers to 'find' components. 'Spare' engines etc. can normally be found. As soon as you get into slightly larger numbers, but have virtually no large volume, planned build schedule, you become a problem for their inventory and systems.

DonkeyApple

55,419 posts

170 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
rockin said:
That IMO neatly encapsulates the pickle which new-TVR seems to have got into.
Probably although their primary hurdle is investment capital which has not materialised as originally agreed.

GT3-RS

1,085 posts

220 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
2000 HP.....I can't even comment on such pointless frippery

otolith

56,214 posts

205 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
Really, all the negativity round here, and it could be avoided with one small styling change.


Tickle

4,928 posts

205 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
otolith said:
Really, all the negativity round here, and it could be avoided with one small styling change.

This is great, it's the direction Porsche need to be heading to get them away from the perception of being an SUV manufacturer.

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
otolith said:
Really, all the negativity round here, and it could be avoided with one small styling change.

biggrin

blueg33

35,992 posts

225 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
otolith said:
Really, all the negativity round here, and it could be avoided with one small styling change.

For some here that would remove all of the negative comments and justify a 50% price hike whilst charging extra for pretty much everything you may want

otolith

56,214 posts

205 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Lotus's reputation for "class leading dynamics" really is not one that stands up to modern scrutiny, and the real reason their products are considered so class leading (despite often being of far lower quality and having far less validation due to budget constraints) is mainly because they only sell vehicles into classes where dynamics are of the singular and highest importance. For example, it's really easy to make a 900kg, mid-engined car on small tyres, without power steering and that has practically zero NVH targets, have "class leading" steering feel. In fact, you don't actually need to do much to achieve it, because it is baked into the physical attributes of that architecture. Hence, go look at an elise and try and find the "trick" bits bolted to it, and, well, you can't really, because there aren't any. Yes, the basic tuning is good, in terms of spring and roll rates, damper rates and the basic suspension kinematics are ok too, but there is nothing actually outstanding in the engineering, nothing that any number of other OE's couldn't do if they sold that type of product. IMO
Though apparently not Alfa Romeo, even with Fiat Chrysler group behind it.

sideways sid

1,371 posts

216 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
The Evija looks fabulous - Henry Catchpole's Carfection video mentioned earlier in the thread is Illuminating.

It would be great to see styling and tech trickle down to the next generation of Exiges and Elises in coming years.

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
otolith said:
Really, all the negativity round here, and it could be avoided with one small styling change.

For some here that would remove all of the negative comments and justify a 50% price hike whilst charging extra for pretty much everything you may want
Except the production version would look like a Panamera... frown

CABC

5,589 posts

102 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
otolith said:
Max_Torque said:
Lotus's reputation for "class leading dynamics" really is not one that stands up to modern scrutiny, and the real reason their products are considered so class leading (despite often being of far lower quality and having far less validation due to budget constraints) is mainly because they only sell vehicles into classes where dynamics are of the singular and highest importance. For example, it's really easy to make a 900kg, mid-engined car on small tyres, without power steering and that has practically zero NVH targets, have "class leading" steering feel. In fact, you don't actually need to do much to achieve it, because it is baked into the physical attributes of that architecture. Hence, go look at an elise and try and find the "trick" bits bolted to it, and, well, you can't really, because there aren't any. Yes, the basic tuning is good, in terms of spring and roll rates, damper rates and the basic suspension kinematics are ok too, but there is nothing actually outstanding in the engineering, nothing that any number of other OE's couldn't do if they sold that type of product. IMO
Though apparently not Alfa Romeo, even with Fiat Chrysler group behind it.
the 4C was a bespoke platform which is the ongoing issue with PH "if an upgraded mass produced hatchback can be so good for 25k then what can a GT86/Elise/MX5 do that's better?" Sadly not enough people appreciate chassis feel so we'll be left with only blunt hatchbacks at sub 40k as opposed to choice.

Max makes valid points, which are the reasons so many have fond memories of older French hatches. At 850kg a 106 Rallye is a pretty good start for driving involvement.

DoubleD

22,154 posts

109 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
CABC said:
the 4C was a bespoke platform which is the ongoing issue with PH "if an upgraded mass produced hatchback can be so good for 25k then what can a GT86/Elise/MX5 do that's better?" Sadly not enough people appreciate chassis feel so we'll be left with only blunt hatchbacks at sub 40k as opposed to choice.

Max makes valid points, which are the reasons so many have fond memories of older French hatches. At 850kg a 106 Rallye is a pretty good start for driving involvement.
Or a more modern car like a Megane RS250

unsprung

5,467 posts

125 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
otolith said:
Really, all the negativity round here, and it could be avoided with one small styling change.
lol, clever

it would be interesting to find, some weeks later, that your handiwork had gone viral such that enthusiasts were now confused as to the origin of this car

make another version with Dyson on it !!! wink


otolith

56,214 posts

205 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
CABC said:
otolith said:
Max_Torque said:
Lotus's reputation for "class leading dynamics" really is not one that stands up to modern scrutiny, and the real reason their products are considered so class leading (despite often being of far lower quality and having far less validation due to budget constraints) is mainly because they only sell vehicles into classes where dynamics are of the singular and highest importance. For example, it's really easy to make a 900kg, mid-engined car on small tyres, without power steering and that has practically zero NVH targets, have "class leading" steering feel. In fact, you don't actually need to do much to achieve it, because it is baked into the physical attributes of that architecture. Hence, go look at an elise and try and find the "trick" bits bolted to it, and, well, you can't really, because there aren't any. Yes, the basic tuning is good, in terms of spring and roll rates, damper rates and the basic suspension kinematics are ok too, but there is nothing actually outstanding in the engineering, nothing that any number of other OE's couldn't do if they sold that type of product. IMO
Though apparently not Alfa Romeo, even with Fiat Chrysler group behind it.
the 4C was a bespoke platform which is the ongoing issue with PH "if an upgraded mass produced hatchback can be so good for 25k then what can a GT86/Elise/MX5 do that's better?" Sadly not enough people appreciate chassis feel so we'll be left with only blunt hatchbacks at sub 40k as opposed to choice.

Max makes valid points, which are the reasons so many have fond memories of older French hatches. At 850kg a 106 Rallye is a pretty good start for driving involvement.
Indeed, but if any competent engineer can make such a car handle, strange that Alfa didn't.

CABC

5,589 posts

102 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
otolith said:
Indeed, but if any competent engineer can make such a car handle, strange that Alfa didn't.
true, and a real shame.

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
otolith said:
Really, all the negativity round here, and it could be avoided with one small styling change.

Oh no!! I had the misfortune of going to a Porsche Cult Day at Castle Hedingham once, two hours of my life in total boredom.

VERTBORON

4 posts

105 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
I want it .........

otolith

56,214 posts

205 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
giveitfish said:
As you said in the Elise thread, “Bluntly, they need buyers to see a 50k Lotus how they'd see a 50k McLaren, not how they'd see a 50k Mazda.”

That sums up the purpose of Evija beautifully, and is basically the executive summary of the Geely business plan for Lotus IMO.

I think they have an uphill struggle in the UK, but for every other market the Lotus brand is currently almost invisible so they have a great chance to start again, jumping off from F1 wins and James Bond supercars from the 70’s and completely skipping the cut-price decades that followed.
yes

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 19th July 2019
quotequote all
otolith said:
giveitfish said:
As you said in the Elise thread, “Bluntly, they need buyers to see a 50k Lotus how they'd see a 50k McLaren, not how they'd see a 50k Mazda.”

That sums up the purpose of Evija beautifully, and is basically the executive summary of the Geely business plan for Lotus IMO.

I think they have an uphill struggle in the UK, but for every other market the Lotus brand is currently almost invisible so they have a great chance to start again, jumping off from F1 wins and James Bond supercars from the 70’s and completely skipping the cut-price decades that followed.
yes
How many times has it been said that Lotus will become this great world beating empire? It’s not going to happen.