RE: Litchfield adds 200hp to 992 Carrera 911

RE: Litchfield adds 200hp to 992 Carrera 911

Author
Discussion

drjdog

345 posts

71 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
Would they do an extra 100 for £500?

This apart from the bigger brakes and more options around suspension (I doubt either of these make for a much better road car), what is the point of the S now?

Pommy

14,275 posts

217 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
monzaxjr said:
sidesauce said:
That's a pretty impressive performance gain for the money...
Yup. 200bhp for just over a bag of sand. Bargain.
Are you a cockney trader?

Its literally less effort to type £1000.

fk me.

untakenname

4,973 posts

193 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
I also misread the graph at first, should use more contrasting colours.
200hp freed up from just a remap with no supporting mods needed is really poor form from Porsche imo as they are treating their customers as mugs.

Addymk2

334 posts

173 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
Pommy said:
monzaxjr said:
sidesauce said:
That's a pretty impressive performance gain for the money...
Yup. 200bhp for just over a bag of sand. Bargain.
Are you a cockney trader?

Its literally less effort to type £1000.

fk me.
Calm down China plate.

Wills2

23,007 posts

176 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
I think the article is the source of the confusion as it tells a different story to the dyno plot.

Not sure I'd fancy adding 130-200hp to £100k+ Carrera/S myself, you say good bye to the warranty and if financed they can default you and it's not like the standard car is slow.




fred bloggs

1,312 posts

201 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
wab172uk said:
Still. As an ultimate sleeper, this car ticks huge boxes,
Yea, a brand new 911 is not what Id call a sleeper.

fred bloggs

1,312 posts

201 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
untakenname said:
Porsche imo as they are treating their customers as mugs.
Is that new for a german car company ??

E65Ross

35,141 posts

213 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
wab172uk said:
Still. As an ultimate sleeper, this car ticks huge boxes
rofl How on earth is a 911 a sleeper!?!? It's hardly a humdrum looking 5 series estate car with 600bhp is it!?

phil4

1,220 posts

239 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
fred bloggs said:
untakenname said:
Porsche imo as they are treating their customers as mugs.
Is that new for a german car company ??
Are they though? Firstly the article points out the emissions problem... something which Porsche need to deal with.

Secondly, does it have the same longevity, and tolerance to climate and not so good fuels in other countries?

We know Porsche spend a -lot- of money testing their cars around the world and for millions of miles, it's perhaps not too fair to call them out on giving you a map that works in all situations and meets their emission requirements.

CaptainSensib1e

1,434 posts

222 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
untakenname said:
poor form from Porsche imo as they are treating their customers as mugs.
Are they really? Would the car still pass the relevant emissions tests with this map? Are all the rest of the components on the car well engineered enough to last with this kind of power over the long term?

Venisonpie

3,309 posts

83 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
phil4 said:
Are they though? Firstly the article points out the emissions problem... something which Porsche need to deal with.

Secondly, does it have the same longevity, and tolerance to climate and not so good fuels in other countries?

We know Porsche spend a -lot- of money testing their cars around the world and for millions of miles, it's perhaps not too fair to call them out on giving you a map that works in all situations and meets their emission requirements.
And are wary having experienced one or two engine issues over the years..

PhantomPH

4,043 posts

226 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
I know people can do whatever they like with their cars and money, but to me this seems almost too big an increase just from a remap. As other have mentioned, you would be pushing another 50% of power through the entire drivetrain. Are we really supposed to think that Porsche have built in that level of tolerance to the components? Would be some serious over-engineering if so.

I know that Litchfield are a good company and will effectively take over the warranty on the car, but I think I'm just a little too much of an 'over thinker' for this level of mod.


robsprocket

109 posts

179 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
RumbleOfThunder said:
Actually looking at said graph, the "crossover" for power and torque doesn't seem to occur until 5200? That is a dramatic change to the characteristic of the engine, not one I'd probably fancy.
LOL, all bhp/torque curves cross at 5,252. You should do some research into how BHP and Torque are related.

Meridius

1,608 posts

153 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
Full graph in a higher res


sagarich

1,218 posts

150 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
"reduces emphasis on emission control to maximise performance"

Will this fail an emissions test come MOT time then?


phil4

1,220 posts

239 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
The graph above shows the stock as 475bhp... new as 580bhp - so only 105bhp gain.... where did they get 200 from?

Ahh...that's a comparison with a 4S.

Edited by phil4 on Wednesday 28th August 13:49

aaron_2000

5,407 posts

84 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
Pommy said:
monzaxjr said:
sidesauce said:
That's a pretty impressive performance gain for the money...
Yup. 200bhp for just over a bag of sand. Bargain.
Are you a cockney trader?

Its literally less effort to type £1000.

fk me.
You ok hun? xx

Pommy

14,275 posts

217 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
aaron_2000 said:
Pommy said:
monzaxjr said:
sidesauce said:
That's a pretty impressive performance gain for the money...
Yup. 200bhp for just over a bag of sand. Bargain.
Are you a cockney trader?

Its literally less effort to type £1000.

fk me.
You ok hun? xx
Im just bag of sand.

RudeDog

1,652 posts

175 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
Two Nissan related comments come to mind...

Almost every Skyline (R33 or R34) left the showroom with 280bhp but you'd be hard pushed to find one with less than 400bhp on the road. Will the same happen here?

Nissan did something with the 350z to prevent remaps or mods from impacting the performance of the vehicle. Didn't seem to matter what people did, it still reported the same power output. I think people found ways around it eventually but it required serious changes, not just a remap. Have Lichfield announced this mod too early and could Porsche do the same to throw a spanner in the works?


acey81

177 posts

111 months

Wednesday 28th August 2019
quotequote all
Tune the S with PASM, PDCC, RWS and the upcoming aerokit slap som Cup2 265/325 on it and nothing south of a 991.2 GT3RS will touch it. Too bad you can't get the folding buckets in the S.