RE: VW e-Beetle on the way to Frankfurt

RE: VW e-Beetle on the way to Frankfurt

Author
Discussion

kambites

67,591 posts

222 months

Friday 6th September 2019
quotequote all
arkenphel said:
So let me get this right. scratchchin
93mph max speed.
1 hour to charge 93 mile range.
Assuming it can do 93miles with 1 hours charge, my trip from newcastle to Edinburgh of 110 miles will take me 3 hours as opposed to my usual under 2 in my normal car.

Nah, the tech isnt there yet for me. I'll get an electric car then the charging times are similar to filling a fossil powered car, I think, no matter how iconic the shell.
Because of course that's exactly the sort of trip someone would buy a 60s Beetle convertible for otherwise? hehe

There's plenty of EVs which will do that trip and back again without recharging, and if you can charge them at home they'll do it for about £1.50 each way. If you can't charge at home, I doubt you'd be considering a convertible Beetle anyway.

Edited by kambites on Friday 6th September 08:14

Dr Interceptor

7,800 posts

197 months

Friday 6th September 2019
quotequote all
I like everything, except for the side skirts under the running boards.

I have a couple of old VW's, a 1958 stock Beetle, and a 1973 running a 1641cc with big twin Webers. I always feel guilty taking that one into city centres as it stinks of petrol laugh Plus with ULEZ etc coming in, it won't be long before we're not allowed to.

This is just ideal... Looks fun, wind in the hair classic motoring, with no emissions. Plus, how often do we do 90+ miles in the classics in one hit...

kambites

67,591 posts

222 months

Friday 6th September 2019
quotequote all
Dr Interceptor said:
I like everything, except for the side skirts under the running boards.
I assume that's the sides of the battery pack.

Dr Interceptor

7,800 posts

197 months

Friday 6th September 2019
quotequote all
kambites said:
Dr Interceptor said:
I like everything, except for the side skirts under the running boards.
I assume that's the sides of the battery pack.
I'd guess so too... I'd have to try and work around it... Perhaps put some more under the front in place of the fuel tank...

T-195

2,671 posts

62 months

Friday 6th September 2019
quotequote all
Dr Interceptor said:
I always feel guilty taking that one into city centres as it stinks of petrol laugh .
At least it doesn't stink of diesel, the real problem.

Dr Interceptor

7,800 posts

197 months

Friday 6th September 2019
quotequote all
Only just noticed as well the article features two different cars... This one still has the holes in the deck lid from the 'Volkswagen' badge... laughlaugh


sisu

2,585 posts

174 months

Friday 6th September 2019
quotequote all
They use a non cabrio deck lid.


More pics..



Dr Interceptor

7,800 posts

197 months

Friday 6th September 2019
quotequote all
sisu said:
They use a non cabrio deck lid.
Well there's no point in having vents letting water into the rear end... The new boot is actually quite practical though!

wildatheart

160 posts

180 months

Friday 6th September 2019
quotequote all
looks so bad with all that flab hanging off its bottom -like it had way too many pies

NDNDNDND

2,024 posts

184 months

Friday 6th September 2019
quotequote all
Practically, functionally and economically wouldn't you be better off putting a Subaru engine in it?

T-195

2,671 posts

62 months

Friday 6th September 2019
quotequote all
NDNDNDND said:
Practically, functionally and economically wouldn't you be better off putting a Subaru engine in it?
And made it far easier to sell on.

It looks like a bad kit car.

Flying Toaster

270 posts

154 months

Saturday 7th September 2019
quotequote all
AMGSee55 said:
Quite - it may have twice the power of the original, but that’s certainly not reflected in the power to weight ratio!

Ref an earlier comment, confess I do see some merit in an electric DS. A car which on one hand was incredibly futuristic and innovative, but powered (in its earlier form) by a very outdated engine.

I shall now await to be hung, drawn and quartered by Citroen purists! punch
While the engine in the DS is probably the least interesting bit, (was suppised to be an air cooled flat six wasn't it?) it did power the hydraulic pump. I'm thinking that an electric version would need a separate small motor to power the hydraulics, wonder if that would affect the range unduly.

Le Controleur Horizontal

1,480 posts

61 months

Saturday 7th September 2019
quotequote all
AMGSee55 said:
Quite - it may have twice the power of the original, but that’s certainly not reflected in the power to weight ratio!

Ref an earlier comment, confess I do see some merit in an electric DS. A car which on one hand was incredibly futuristic and innovative, but powered (in its earlier form) by a very outdated engine.

I shall now await to be hung, drawn and quartered by Citroen purists! punch
They already exist.

sisu

2,585 posts

174 months

Sunday 8th September 2019
quotequote all
The DS electric conversions use the C5 hydra pump as it is electric.

My main beef with the electric conversions of classic cars is the safety of having 400kg of metal in places it was never intended. This isnt an issue for a car you are mouching down to the village cafe/restaurant in a Fiat 500, Beetle or Mini downtown in traffic
But having a 911 or 308 going thru a hedge with the frunk, back seat full of batteries it will fold up like a coke can.

Fast Bug

11,719 posts

162 months

Sunday 8th September 2019
quotequote all
kambites said:
Because of course that's exactly the sort of trip someone would buy a 60s Beetle convertible for otherwise? hehe
When I had my Beetle i used to take it to Santa Pod (over 100 miles from my house) as well as shows in Belgium and Germany. Mind you i did have have to stop several times for petrol, 48 IDA Webers aren't the best for mpg laugh