RE: Range Rover 4.6 Vogue (P38) | The Brave Pill

RE: Range Rover 4.6 Vogue (P38) | The Brave Pill

Author
Discussion

Walter Sobchak

5,723 posts

225 months

Wednesday 18th September 2019
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
The p38 certainly has some shortfalls. But it really isn't as complex as internet folklore proclaims. The oily bits are all very similar to earlier LR products. And there are lots of good guides and info on all the bits, plus very good parts supply. The L322 is arguably far more complex. But only on par with same era BMW's or Jaguars.
I think we can both agree that air suspension is a weak(ish) point on both models which isn’t the cheapest to put right, discounting the slipped liner issue I will concede that the P38 has less to go wrong overall, with the L322 some of the gearboxes tend to suffer-most commonly the ZF6 speed (the one in my L320 Sport did) the 3.6 TDV8s have a well known habit of turbos failing, and there are other things that are common failures but that could be lived without imo- like the electronic steering tilt etc.
The sweet spot for an L322 would probably be a 4.4 TDV8 with the ZF8 speed for me, there were better sorted by then but that is leagues apart from both P38s and early L322s in terms of cost.

p1stonhead

25,568 posts

168 months

Wednesday 18th September 2019
quotequote all
Someone find me the best Range Rover for £5k please?!

I want one so much to waft about in.

aaron_2000

5,407 posts

84 months

Thursday 19th September 2019
quotequote all
p1stonhead said:
Someone find me the best Range Rover for £5k please?!

I want one so much to waft about in.
A TDV8 with the best service record you can find.

cybertrophic

225 posts

222 months

Friday 4th October 2019
quotequote all
Busterbulldog said:
I have had a few , a good one is a lovely thing still.
Agreed - no, they aren’t quick, but they will bowl along at 70-ish happily in wafty comfort, go round corners well enough, but it’s the fact you never, ever feel you can’t hail your way out of the ice, snow or mud that makes it unbeatable for those of us whose wives and daughters are obsessed with the four-hooded money-eating machines known as horses.

I’ve had Jeep grand cherokees (Comfy seats, good off-road but like a tractor on tarmac), currently have a cayenne diesel (great on road, but mediocre in boggy or snowy conditions), but nothing does it all like a Rangie. Newest ones are a bit Chelsea tractor, L322 has more issues than a p38, whilst being harder to fix and a classic is, well, a tractor with carpets.

Ideally I’d love one of the overfinch ones with the Chevy v8 (sorts the engine issue), a set of uprated airbags (air issues largely down to splits in the OEM ones)... make sure you have the blackbox reader and wire a button to trip The was relay if you need to, disconnect the alarm aerial (don’t need it and WiFi signals cause it to ping the battery) and enjoy.

Or get a Holland and Holland and fit the Chevy smallblock to that.

Great old buses.

SlimRick

2,258 posts

166 months

Monday 7th October 2019
quotequote all
[redacted]

So

26,304 posts

223 months

Monday 7th October 2019
quotequote all
[redacted]

rich12

3,465 posts

155 months

Monday 7th October 2019
quotequote all
SlimRick said:
Indeed, it's a TD6 with a facelift. Just fitted some Grabber AT3s for the winter....assuming it lasts that long smile


If it doesn't last and mine somehow does.. Can I have your front end please?

Drew66

2 posts

55 months

Thursday 24th October 2019
quotequote all
I bought this car a week ago !!!!

DonkeyApple

55,402 posts

170 months

Thursday 24th October 2019
quotequote all
Drew66 said:
I bought this car a week ago !!!!
Congrats. We can surmise from your post that you haven’t been killed by it but any more information? wink

Drew66

2 posts

55 months

Thursday 24th October 2019
quotequote all
I was just pretty surprised to find it in an article I guess. Or to be honest, nearly SH*T myself thinking I'd bought a kipper. However....EAS does appear to let itself drop over a period, but under no illusion this wont be the final chapter of ongoing problems.

cybertrophic

225 posts

222 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
pSyCoSiS said:
300bhp/ton said:
pSyCoSiS said:
Now now ladies, handbags away!

It's like with every car - you either like them, or you don't.

Doesn't make it better or inferior to other cars just because you haven an opinion.

Back in their day, I'm sure the 2.5 BMW M51 was adequate in the P38, but today, a 1998 vintage ML320 would leave it standing. In comparison, the BMW M57 3.0 TD6 isn't exactly a rocket ship either, but probably kept up with the ML270 CDI or the X5 3.0d when new?
Isn't an ML320 petrol? A quick Google says 215hp, so very much on par with the 4.6 RV8 p38 in the power department.

4.6 RR = 0-60mph in 9.6sec
ML320 = 0-60mph in 9.2sec

Parkers shows the ML270 CDI as 163hp and 0-60mph in 11.0 - 11.8 sec.

Quicker than a p38 diesel. But not exactly a rocket ship still.
Agree with what you have said - my point is that the power plants were adequate for the time and for what else was on offer from other manufacturers. Even though they may feel sluggish now.

A RR is a RR, and it's charm, ability and following will always appeal to those who have had good experience / fond memories. Those that have experienced money pits, will naturally dislike them and can you blame them?

Like with every car, you get good ones and bad apples. E60 V10 M5s are riddled with issues and most people avoid them like the plague, but there are owners who have all the original running gear still and not encountered an issue.

As a driver's car, the L322 is well ahead of the P38. More refined, more luxurious, etc. How they compare off-road, I cannot tell you as I have never tried in either. I have done in an old Disco 300 TDi Auto and that was an impressive and capable tool.
I have had both off-road. Ultimately, the L322 is easier for *most* people to drive in mud and across fields than the P38, largely due to things like Hill Descent.

But, and it is a key point, a P38 can be bought for peanuts. The chassis went on to underpin two generations of Discovery with minimal tweaks and if you think the P38 was unreliable, the L322 has it matched easily.

P38: leaky airbags (usually a lack of maintenance/replacement at 60,000 miles), EAS settling (disconnect the booster Ariel for the key fob) or terminal engine issue (any rover v8 can do that, but later THOR Ecu is better than the early GEMS at saving the engine from too many woes). Swapping in a smallblock Chevy is quite straightforward and those motors *are* bulletproof.

L322: all the usual BMw engine woes (vanos, head gaskets, Ecu faults), just exacerbated by dragging 2.5 tons of complex machinery around. Rear windows falling out or exploding, the multifunction steering wheel habitually shorts and causes chaos with the electrical systems...and air suspension issues.

I love rangies, I’d happily drive nothing else if I could. For a cheap shed, a late Thor 4.6 p38 - buy yourself the EAS reset tool, wire a switch to manually jump the relay for the EAS pump and stay on top of coolant and oil changes and enjoy.

For a serious secondhand buy, the latest tDV8 you can afford.

Henry_b

191 posts

80 months

Thursday 14th November 2019
quotequote all
With turbo and EGR issues and recently a few hwadgasket horror stories i'd be inclined to avoid the TDV8

The 2006+ Jag powered L322's are the ones to get good engine and good gearbox.

The pre 2006 L322's are crap in terms of drivetrain reliability..


P38 is best wink