RE: Alpine A110 S | Driven

RE: Alpine A110 S | Driven

Author
Discussion

Miserablegit

4,021 posts

110 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
TimoMak said:
That was exactly the reason.

I received two emails, the first email told me a post had been deleted as it quoted a remark from an offensive poster (you) and had to be removed. The second email advised the above and I could no longer post.

Not quite sure why Alpine fans feel the need to get any alternative or negative opinions censored though, so much for open debate. I'll applaud with jazz hands from afar in my safe space in future so as not to offend any Alpine millennials.
Ha funny how the trolls get upset when they are called out
Timo we know you and Simon amg don’t like the Alpine. Nobody actually cares. People just get fed up of your ill informed posts and call you out for being a troll.


nickfrog

21,185 posts

218 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
Throttlebody said:
From the Renault stable, I reckon this superb lightweight Alpine S makes the lower specification non-record holding Mégane 300 Trophy R look pretty redundant.
Not sure why. The basic R has 99% of the useful bits (higher camber kinematics, lightweight, adjustable Ohlins, plenty of braking endurance etc etc). The top spec one (literally one) is very far into law of diminishing returns territory, particularly when you put cheapo lightweight 18' alloys on the "base" car. It's also £21k cheaper.

simonbamg

767 posts

124 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
Miserablegit said:
Ha funny how the trolls get upset when they are called out
Timo we know you and Simon amg don’t like the Alpine. Nobody actually cares. People just get fed up of your ill informed posts and call you out for being a troll.
i'm FAMOUS!!! you have made my day, thanks Miserable

Throttlebody

2,348 posts

55 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
Miserablegit said:
Throttlebody said:
From the Renault stable, I reckon this superb lightweight Alpine S makes the lower specification non-record holding Mégane 300 Trophy R look pretty redundant.
They are two completely different cars - the Trophy R is still a track special whereas the 110s is still more road-oriented. I’m sure the stock Trophy R is quicker around the green hell if that is what people are interested in.
Both are £50k+, 2 seat only, 300 bhp track orientated products from Renault. Except the Alpine S is
200 kg lighter, mid engined, looks great and probably goes around the Ring at a similar pace to the budget Trophy R. OK the silhouettes are very different but it you fancied dropping 50k on a Renault 2 seater for some odd track action - Alpine S all day long.

Prestonese

794 posts

106 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
TimoMak said:
That was exactly the reason.

I received two emails, the first email told me a post had been deleted as it quoted a remark from an offensive poster (you) and had to be removed. The second email advised the above and I could no longer post.

Not quite sure why Alpine fans feel the need to get any alternative or negative opinions censored though, so much for open debate. I'll applaud with jazz hands from afar in my safe space in future so as not to offend any Alpine millennials.
Man pokes hornets nest. Man gets upset when hornets stings him and seeks moral high ground. Go figure.

Notanotherturbo

494 posts

208 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
unsprung said:
In before somebody suggests an LS swap. wink

Lovely photography.

I like the A110 a lot. At the same time, I do share the interest of some others here for a colour palette that might expand to include a couple of more adventurous and/or retro-inspired choices.
I've put an LS3 in an Alpine - just not a A110 smile

Sporky

6,284 posts

65 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
Throttlebody said:
Both are £50k+, 2 seat only, 300 bhp track orientated products from Renault. Except the Alpine S is
200 kg lighter, mid engined, looks great and probably goes around the Ring at a similar pace to the budget Trophy R. OK the silhouettes are very different but it you fancied dropping 50k on a Renault 2 seater for some odd track action - Alpine S all day long.
Me too, but there are hot hatch people, and I don't think they'd be wrong to go for the Trophy R. It's not something I'd go for, but that doesn't make it a bad choice. The reviews have been pretty impressive.

nickfrog

21,185 posts

218 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
Throttlebody said:
the budget Trophy R
There isn't such a thing, sadly.

bcr5784

7,116 posts

146 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
Sporky said:
Me too, but there are hot hatch people,
I'm not sure that is a defined breed. If so I'm very much a mongrel.

Don Roque

17,998 posts

160 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
What a shame they don't offer a manual. It seems silly to try to make a focused, lightweight car for driving enjoyment and not offer a manual shifter. Automatics are great for cack-handers who have no technique, though.

MyV10goesWhaaa

301 posts

94 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
Throttlebody said:
Miserablegit said:
Throttlebody said:
From the Renault stable, I reckon this superb lightweight Alpine S makes the lower specification non-record holding Mégane 300 Trophy R look pretty redundant.
They are two completely different cars - the Trophy R is still a track special whereas the 110s is still more road-oriented. I’m sure the stock Trophy R is quicker around the green hell if that is what people are interested in.
Both are £50k+, 2 seat only, 300 bhp track orientated products from Renault. Except the Alpine S is
200 kg lighter, mid engined, looks great and probably goes around the Ring at a similar pace to the budget Trophy R. OK the silhouettes are very different but it you fancied dropping 50k on a Renault 2 seater for some odd track action - Alpine S all day long.
I agree...

If your going to do it... do it proper!!!

bcr5784

7,116 posts

146 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
Don Roque said:
What a shame they don't offer a manual. It seems silly to try to make a focused, lightweight car for driving enjoyment and not offer a manual shifter. Automatics are great for cack-handers who have no technique, though.
What a shame that there are still those who categorise those who are happy with dual clutch automatics as cack handers. I've been heel and toeing for 30 years - how good is your double declutching?

Sporky

6,284 posts

65 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
Don Roque said:
What a shame they don't offer a manual.
Even if everyone on the inferweb who's said that would have bought a manual one it wouldn't have paid for the development.

The real omission for a true driver's car is the lack of manual choke and spark advance, of course.

Don Roque

17,998 posts

160 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
bcr5784 said:
how good is your double declutching?
Perfect thanks, I even prefer it to just blippjng with the clutch in.

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

235 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
TimoMak said:
SidewaysSi said:
TimoMak said:
Yes marvellous. Just don’t mention any negative points, question any aspect about the car or express a different opinion other than the usual fawning nonsense, because if you do they’ll ban you from the thread.
Not sure that was the reason...
That was exactly the reason.

I received two emails, the first email told me a post had been deleted as it quoted a remark from an offensive poster (you) and had to be removed. The second email advised the above and I could no longer post.
That is unfortunate. But all's right with the world again.

Sporky

6,284 posts

65 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
They do. It's more controls to fiddle with. If you've never tried both you should - genuinely involves you more 8n the process of driving.

Less time to actually enjoy the drive, of course, but this hair-shirt approach isn't about enjoyment, is it?

Miserablegit

4,021 posts

110 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
Well I prefer the hand crank to this new fangled electric starter nonsense.
And don’t get me started on efi- if there’s no risk of flooding the carbs then it’s not an engine.

alpgta

81 posts

152 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
Notanotherturbo said:
unsprung said:
In before somebody suggests an LS swap. wink

Lovely photography.

I like the A110 a lot. At the same time, I do share the interest of some others here for a colour palette that might expand to include a couple of more adventurous and/or retro-inspired choices.
I've put an LS3 in an Alpine - just not a A110 smile
Yeah, just need to get it finished now Tony! Chop, chop. It answers the gearbox question too. Interesting the old UN1 is stronger than the DCT. Fingers crossed. ;-)

unsprung

5,467 posts

125 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all




Notanotherturbo said:
unsprung said:
In before somebody suggests an LS swap. wink

Lovely photography.

I like the A110 a lot. At the same time, I do share the interest of some others here for a colour palette that might expand to include a couple of more adventurous and/or retro-inspired choices.
I've put an LS3 in an Alpine - just not a A110 smile

superb thumbup

I genuflect in your general direction.




Onehp

1,617 posts

284 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
DeltonaS said:
Miserablegit said:
Pulse00 said:
I think they are ugly. 4C looks so much better & is lighter/faster. Interior isn't as good though.
4c is a good looking car with the 4c spider headlights on it if the paint hasn’t flaked off
4c is not much lighter
4c is not quicker
Yes the 4C is a lot lighter.

The 4C including sport pack and aircon weighs 1.015kg (excl. cf. roof), the Alpine A110 S weighs 1.114kg

That's 99kg, or almost 10%, 99kg is a lot in this segment.
Problem is, 4C's don't actually weigh 1000kg. Weighed by magazines, they come in at between 1068 and 1136kg, so on average they weigh almost the same...


Edited by Onehp on Wednesday 30th October 06:57