RE: MG SV-R | The Brave Pill

RE: MG SV-R | The Brave Pill

Author
Discussion

Jazzy Jag

3,432 posts

92 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
TBH.

I would put this car in the same category as the Lamborghini Countach.

Totally impractical, horrible to drive, expensive to own and run. Poor build quality and liable to become a huge money pit.

Its cartoon chatacature of a car that appeals to the child inside us and adorns schoolboy bedroom walls.

Every fiber in your body knows that owning one is a ridiculous idea.

But you still want one.....

Slippydiff

14,859 posts

224 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
595Heaven said:
I remember having a passenger ride in an early development car. It was not great.

It went well enough, but there was really weird hollow, booming road noise all the time, I think this was down to the CF body. Would have been really wearing on a long journey, and drowned out the sound of the V8.

Incredibly stiffly sprung, and very cramped inside, with some shocking build quality to boot. The A pillar / roof rail was very close to your head, and I remember hitting my head really hard on this whilst we went round a bumpy corner. As it was naked carbon, it was very solid, and I felt pretty dazed.

It’s an interesting bit of the sad story of MG Rover’s demise, but far from being a great car. It’s looks from the front were quite good, and the Punto headlights really suited it. The massive side vents were a bit overdone, and the back end looked very amateurish. Fiat lights again, but from the Coupe this time.

I’m sure I remember that Bad Obsession Motorsport (Project Binky) have one as another project.
They indeed do, but by the time Project Binky, Project EsCargo and the other car based projects have been completed AND they’ve sourced, blagged and fabricated the components for the MG, the internal combustion engine will be dead and buried ...

GranCab

2,902 posts

147 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
TheOrangePeril said:
Immensely cool vehicle. Short of Lamborghinis and TVRs, there was nothing contemporary that looked this exciting. I remember a point in time where the local MG/Rover garage had one of these, the Audi garage had an R8 and the Honda garage had an NSX on display... This (despite the others' many advantages) always seemed a more desirable object.

Does anybody know where all the rumours regarding factory-fitted nitrous kits came from? I asked a gent on the MG X-Power stand at the NEC motorshow and he had no idea.
When Clarkson tested one on Top Gear (and banged his head hard on the cant rail...) he stated that MG were going to do a nitrous version with 1000 HP !

https://www.nicovideo.jp/watch/sm4153555

Edited by GranCab on Saturday 16th November 12:36

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
They look nothing like a Rover 75.
It does come to something when a Rover 75 is the better looking vehicle smile

Addymk2

334 posts

173 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
The factory would fit you a 1000bhp Nitrous Oxide kit... Now that's an optional extra you wont find in many other catalogues.

Pumpsmynads

268 posts

157 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Kit car tosh

Howrare

304 posts

207 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Hardly it's biggest failing, but do you reckon you'd be able to load a CD whilst it's gearbox is in Park?


Nickp82

3,196 posts

94 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
certainly a leftfield choice, especially as an auto but a car that comes with a very interesting back story as a seemingly crazy product choice by a manufacturer in dire straits.
I worked for an MGR dealer when the SV was launched, they took one on SoR from Longbridge which sat in the showroom not doing much for a few months before being sent back where it came from.

MattyB_

2,015 posts

258 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
One of the biggest issues is the comically large arches fitted with what look like caster wheels - not only that, but wheels that look like the cheapo ones you used to get from the back of Max Power magazine.

Lowered, with bigger, cleaner alloys would improve the look significantly.

Edit - like this. I mean, its still no looker but it's much better:


dunnoreally

976 posts

109 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
I actually really want one of these. There's just something about 'em. Probably not for £50k, though, unless I'd ticked a lot of other bucket list cars off first.

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
MattyB_ said:
One of the biggest issues is the comically large arches fitted with what look like caster wheels - not only that, but wheels that look like the cheapo ones you used to get from the back of Max Power magazine.

Lowered, with bigger, cleaner alloys would improve the look significantly.

Edit - like this. I mean, its still no looker but it's much better:

Anyone who spend £50K on this is certifiable.

JerryF

283 posts

175 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
I was certifiable back in 2015, I bought an SV. Yes, it did have issues, but the carbon shell was beautiful.

I would have another, but at 20k not 50k. 50k is stupid and it will NEVER sell at that price.

Pictured below - driven in icing conditions. Interesting to read the add for this car in later years (Never driven in the rain or snow)....smilesmile





Edited by JerryF on Saturday 16th November 17:36


Edited by JerryF on Saturday 16th November 17:37

Modfarver11

9 posts

54 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Completely forgot this existed! Had no idea about it's fascinating history and have really enjoyed reading more about it. Sounds like it was pretty well sorted to drive and there's part of me that doesn't mind the looks, almost like a British Skyline :/. That said, it has more in common visually with a kit car than it's similar priced competitors at the time and now could have a used Aston V8 Vantage for half that price!

What price could it make sense at? maybe 25k?


Mackofthejungle

1,074 posts

196 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
I think 20 grand would be a fair price for something so weird. Never a looker, never a goer, badly made and not very exotic..

With so few around and even fewer people interested it looks like a case of "smake up your own value". I reckon if you offered 35 they'd bite you hand off!

lotuslover69

269 posts

144 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Isn't this essentially a rebodied Quvale Mangusta?


birdcage

2,841 posts

206 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
'Automatic' WHY!

FlukePlay

954 posts

146 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
This may have a few horses under the bonnet but it looks utter pony. Horrendous then and even worse now, I wouldn't take this for £10K. You can see that I really don't like these.

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
lotuslover69 said:
Isn't this essentially a rebodied Quvale Mangusta?

All kind of nuts

foxbody-87

2,675 posts

167 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
lotuslover69 said:
Isn't this essentially a rebodied Quvale Mangusta?

A good portion of the article is about how it is based on the Mangusta...

RumbleOfThunder

3,560 posts

204 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
I always liked the look of these. I recall them saying a 1000hp version was available but this was clearly bks IMO.