A sportscar shouldn’t have...

A sportscar shouldn’t have...

Author
Discussion

cerb4.5lee

30,840 posts

181 months

Saturday 21st December 2019
quotequote all
Super Josh said:
cerb4.5lee said:
My Cerbera was really difficult to pigeon hole though, it wasn't light enough(between 1100kg-1200kg) to be a sports car
Oh bugga, my mx5 is the same weight. So obviously mx5s are no longer 'sports cars' frown


Cheers,

Josh
I think that pretty much everyone classes the mx5 as a sports car in fairness. thumbup

It is just a personal thing for me, and I class most sports cars as weighing a fair bit under 1000kg that's all. smile

bcr5784

7,120 posts

146 months

Saturday 21st December 2019
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
I think that pretty much everyone classes the mx5 as a sports car in fairness. thumbup

It is just a personal thing for me, and I class most sports cars as weighing a fair bit under 1000kg that's all. smile
The trouble is that pretty much anything a fair bit under 1000kg won't meet crash tests etc. In years gone by MGs and Triumphs and even ACs all weighed under a ton. Even hot hatches like Lotus Cortinas the early Golf GTis were well under a ton. Today even the lightest Elise configured with a few creature comforts is close to a ton - and an Exige is well over. You probably can't make an affordable series production sportscar under your target weight. The Alpine A110 shows how hard you need to try to get to even 1100kg with something vaguely affordable and torsionally stiff - and it would be significantly heavier if it was a convertible.



cerb4.5lee

30,840 posts

181 months

Saturday 21st December 2019
quotequote all
bcr5784 said:
The trouble is that pretty much anything a fair bit under 1000kg won't meet crash tests etc. In years gone by MGs and Triumphs and even ACs all weighed under a ton. Even hot hatches like Lotus Cortinas the early Golf GTis were well under a ton. Today even the lightest Elise configured with a few creature comforts is close to a ton - and an Exige is well over. You probably can't make an affordable series production sportscar under your target weight. The Alpine A110 shows how hard you need to try to get to even 1100kg with something vaguely affordable and torsionally stiff - and it would be significantly heavier if it was a convertible.
Yes and it is quite an old fashioned viewpoint from me really. I was surprised at how heavy the Elise has become recently in fairness. As I've mentioned before I do think that Alpine should be really applauded for getting the A110 in at 1100kg. The Cayman/Boxster are definitely GT cars in comparison for me! biggrin

Niffty951

2,333 posts

229 months

Saturday 21st December 2019
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
My Cerbera was really difficult to pigeon hole though, it wasn't light enough(between 1100kg-1200kg) to be a sports car and it was a 2+2 so that also rules it out as a sports car for me.
Potentially raising the level of controversy further, I consider the Cerbera to be the only supercar I've owned. It is temperamental, ludicrously fast and most importantly the only car that made my hand shake with adrenaline as I picked up the keys knowing I was going for a 'drive'. It was a fantastic handling car but the theatre, lack of protection in an accident and raw feel of the thing always walked a fine line between fear and pleasure. I loved it.

cerb4.5lee

30,840 posts

181 months

Saturday 21st December 2019
quotequote all
Niffty951 said:
cerb4.5lee said:
My Cerbera was really difficult to pigeon hole though, it wasn't light enough(between 1100kg-1200kg) to be a sports car and it was a 2+2 so that also rules it out as a sports car for me.
Potentially raising the level of controversy further, I consider the Cerbera to be the only supercar I've owned. It is temperamental, ludicrously fast and most importantly the only car that made my hand shake with adrenaline as I picked up the keys knowing I was going for a 'drive'. It was a fantastic handling car but the theatre, lack of protection in an accident and raw feel of the thing always walked a fine line between fear and pleasure. I loved it.
Yes and that is a very good way of looking at it to be fair. It was also one of the quickest cars on the road in its time too. driving

bcr5784

7,120 posts

146 months

Saturday 21st December 2019
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
Yes and that is a very good way of looking at it to be fair. It was also one of the quickest cars on the road in its time too. driving
True, but if you compare a Cerbera's performance with a current Supra/Z4/Alpine/Cayman S the 4.2 is slower, the 4.5 faster. Even the 4.2 would have been considered an "animal" in its day , the current generation cars are, by comparison pussy cats...


Edited by bcr5784 on Saturday 21st December 19:48

cerb4.5lee

30,840 posts

181 months

Saturday 21st December 2019
quotequote all
bcr5784 said:
True, but if you compare a Cerbera's performance with a current Supra/Z4/Alpine/Cayman S the 4.2 is slower, the 4.5 faster. Even the 4.2 would have been considered an "animal" in its day , the current generation cars are, by comparison pussy cats...
Yes and I respect the performance of the more modern cars for sure, but the Cerbera does spoil you with its rawness compared to most modern stuff now though for certain.

Niffty951

2,333 posts

229 months

Sunday 22nd December 2019
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
bcr5784 said:
True, but if you compare a Cerbera's performance with a current Supra/Z4/Alpine/Cayman S the 4.2 is slower, the 4.5 faster. Even the 4.2 would have been considered an "animal" in its day , the current generation cars are, by comparison pussy cats...
Yes and I respect the performance of the more modern cars for sure, but the Cerbera does spoil you with its rawness compared to most modern stuff now though for certain.
I think numbers don't tell the whole story. I can say for certain mine was several car lengths quicker than a 500hp R33 Skyline or 996 turbo from 70-170mph and that didn't take many seconds to measure because those are still very quick cars by today's standards. I do remember it being very hard to balance the throttle below 70mph.

Oilchange

8,484 posts

261 months

Sunday 22nd December 2019
quotequote all
In truth, all the cars mentioned are sports cars if they’re even the slightest bit less mundane than a people carrier full of baby sick.
From a 1.6 capri with a go faster stripe to a Ferrari or a Mustang, all are marketed with that bit of extra testosterone in mind.
It’s how the car makes you feel!

People do love to pigeon hole these things, hell if it carried on to the inexorable conclusion we’d be left with Lewis Hamiltons F1 car and everyone else emasculated.

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

262 months

Sunday 22nd December 2019
quotequote all
I always looked at my Cerbera as a GT. Yes it could be a total animal, but I've also traversed France a few times in it in great comfort.

A poor man's Aston/Bentley if you like.

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

235 months

Sunday 22nd December 2019
quotequote all
My Elise isn't a sportscar when it has a roof on. Now I know.

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

262 months

Sunday 22nd December 2019
quotequote all
SidewaysSi said:
My Elise isn't a sportscar when it has a roof on. Now I know.
Or my wife's hard top convertible MX5.

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

235 months

Sunday 22nd December 2019
quotequote all
Tyre Smoke said:
SidewaysSi said:
My Elise isn't a sportscar when it has a roof on. Now I know.
Or my wife's hard top convertible MX5.
I think they miraculously turn into comfortable, quiet GT cars... smile

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

262 months

Sunday 22nd December 2019
quotequote all
Neither are FHC are they? 😉

bcr5784

7,120 posts

146 months

Sunday 22nd December 2019
quotequote all
Tyre Smoke said:
Neither are FHC are they? ??
What about when you bolt on a hardtop for the winter months?

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 22nd December 2019
quotequote all
Tyre Smoke said:
SidewaysSi said:
My Elise isn't a sportscar when it has a roof on. Now I know.
Or my wife's hard top convertible MX5.
The Mx doesn’t belong in the same sentence as an Elise smile

heebeegeetee

28,851 posts

249 months

Sunday 22nd December 2019
quotequote all
yonex said:
The Mx doesn’t belong in the same sentence as an Elise smile
It’s good fun embarrassing Elises with an MX5 on track days though. I’m no driving god but I was surprised at how the two models mixed it on track, and even I found it surprisingly easy. smile

Edited by heebeegeetee on Sunday 22 December 12:57

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 22nd December 2019
quotequote all
heebeegeetee said:
It’s good fun embarrassing Elises with an MX5 on track days though. I’m no driving god but I was surprised at how the two models mixed it on track, and even I found it surprisingly easy. ??
Shirley a tweaked one?

Mort7

1,487 posts

109 months

Sunday 22nd December 2019
quotequote all
Yes, the MX5 is greatly underrated - usually by people who have never actually owned one. driving

bcr5784

7,120 posts

146 months

Sunday 22nd December 2019
quotequote all
yonex said:
The Mx doesn’t belong in the same sentence as an Elise smile
I'm not sure why you should look down on the Mx5 either. It is an affordable fun car which is practical enough to be used as a daily. An Elise is twice the price, and while it is dynamically significantly superior it is an expensive weekend car for most people. I have used one as a daily, but most wouldn't, so you need another car for daily duties. If you can't afford or justify two cars to meet your needs the MX5 seems like a perfectly sensible choice. At the price there really isn't any open topped competition - which is why it's the world's most popular sportscar.