Subaru vs bike head on collision.

Subaru vs bike head on collision.

Author
Discussion

0ddball

862 posts

139 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
A1VDY said:
The problem here with talk of vanishing point, heel and toe, racing line, cornering at 0.8g ect ect is that we're talking of the public roads here.
All this bks needs to be kept for the track..
Woah, steady! You'll trigger the "skilled road drivers", who always use trail braking, flat shifting, and a dab of oppo on their way to their local Tesco.

GC8

19,910 posts

190 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
People should calm down about Eric. He is thick, rather than malicious.

popeyewhite

19,896 posts

120 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
GC8 said:
People should calm down about Eric.
This. Give it a rest please it just looks like bullying disguised as faux outrage now and it's no worse than many other comments dotted around the forum.

Jim on the hill

5,072 posts

190 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
GC8 said:
People should calm down about Eric.
This. Give it a rest please it just looks like bullying disguised as faux outrage now and it's no worse than many other comments dotted around the forum.
He thinks BMW drivers want to see bikers injured or killed due to subarus. Yes agreed the rest of the forum is also plagued with idiots.

DJP

1,198 posts

179 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
Mr Tidy said:
it does put me off getting a bike. frown
Horrible incident but if that biker had been in a car they'd probably both be dead.

Being flung over the top of the car is probably what saved him/them.

21st Century Man

40,912 posts

248 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
A lot of posters feel that many/most drivers would do nothing more than just stand on the brakes and hope for the best, a depressing thought and one borne out by what we saw. I think that a lot of drivers would've also impulsively yanked/swerved to the left to try to get back over, and would've spun off the road to the left. The more considered action would've been to simply run off the road on the right, and there does seem to be an absolute age, at least a full second if not longer, to have processed these options, and yet he does nothing? How he ended up in a head on with so much time and space available with his speed rapidly decreasing is beyond me in my armchair (see first line above) frown

monzaxjr

549 posts

146 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
Jim on the hill said:
popeyewhite said:
GC8 said:
People should calm down about Eric.
This. Give it a rest please it just looks like bullying disguised as faux outrage now and it's no worse than many other comments dotted around the forum.
He thinks BMW drivers want to see bikers injured or killed due to subarus. Yes agreed the rest of the forum is also plagued with idiots.
I don't think it's just this comment. Most people are sick of his st in general.

g3org3y

20,631 posts

191 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
0ddball said:
A1VDY said:
The problem here with talk of vanishing point, heel and toe, racing line, cornering at 0.8g ect ect is that we're talking of the public roads here.
All this bks needs to be kept for the track..
Woah, steady! You'll trigger the "skilled road drivers", who always use trail braking, flat shifting, and a dab of oppo on their way to their local Tesco. Waitrose.
EFA. This is Pistonheads.

768

13,682 posts

96 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
fausTVR said:
I haven't read all posts but that corner was off camber, that's why the car washed out wide like that. 100% driver error of course, way too fast there for that reason. Only local knowledge and skilled driving could have avoided that. Shame he didn't stuff it in the verge but we are kind of conditioned to keep on the road no matter what.
If it's off camber it's marginal. This is the street view into the corner from the opposite direction.



I don't think the speed, camber or the car were an issue with why it didn't make it round the corner.

fausTVR said:
I hope the poor sod on the bike makes a good recovery.
Agreed.

Weezywee

530 posts

73 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
21st Century Man said:
A lot of posters feel that many/most drivers would do nothing more than just stand on the brakes and hope for the best, a depressing thought and one borne out by what we saw. I think that a lot of drivers would've also impulsively yanked/swerved to the left to try to get back over, and would've spun off the road to the left. The more considered action would've been to simply run off the road on the right, and there does seem to be an absolute age, at least a full second if not longer, to have processed these options, and yet he does nothing? How he ended up in a head on with so much time and space available with his speed rapidly decreasing is beyond me in my armchair (see first line above) frown
A second is not an absolute age. Reaction time alone is between 0.3-3 seconds and the marker is 1.5 seconds, so the accident has happened before hes even had chance to react. Everyone here has the benefit of watching the video multiple times knowing what happens, but I would bet that on the incident done 99/100 of us would have done the same. At the time he wasnt going excessively fast, and there must be more to it to get that charge from previous driving. That or he will appeal and have it quashed.

neutral 3

6,490 posts

170 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
I somehow survived a head on smash, caused by two lying scum, smashing into my R1, head on @ speed on my side of the road, in their Merc. The pain both physical and mental, with be with me for the rest of my life. She moved their car back to the correct side of the road before plod arrived and lied her head off in court ( “As I stand before de Lord, he hit our car “ ......
All the lying bh received, was a £975 fine and 5 points. I got regally shafted by the “ Specialist biker solicitor - “ We Are On Your Side “ whom I was stupidly duped into using and also incompetant Essex plod.
My thoughts go out to the biker. I wish him a speedy recovery. I don’t personally think that the Suburu driver deserved the sentence he received.
Whether his tires were old or some other fault / faults were present with his car, we don’t know.


Edited by neutral 3 on Sunday 12th January 12:43


Edited by neutral 3 on Sunday 12th January 12:49

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
Weezywee said:
21st Century Man said:
A lot of posters feel that many/most drivers would do nothing more than just stand on the brakes and hope for the best, a depressing thought and one borne out by what we saw. I think that a lot of drivers would've also impulsively yanked/swerved to the left to try to get back over, and would've spun off the road to the left. The more considered action would've been to simply run off the road on the right, and there does seem to be an absolute age, at least a full second if not longer, to have processed these options, and yet he does nothing? How he ended up in a head on with so much time and space available with his speed rapidly decreasing is beyond me in my armchair (see first line above) frown
A second is not an absolute age. Reaction time alone is between 0.3-3 seconds and the marker is 1.5 seconds, so the accident has happened before hes even had chance to react. Everyone here has the benefit of watching the video multiple times knowing what happens, but I would bet that on the incident done 99/100 of us would have done the same. At the time he wasnt going excessively fast, and there must be more to it to get that charge from previous driving. That or he will appeal and have it quashed.
Finally, a sensible post on this thread.

He did slow before the corner, from indicated almost 70 down to 60, and the time from going wide to hitting the bike was so small that I highly doubt most people would have done anything other than brake as hard as possible. It's not a natural reaction to turn away from the road and most people won't do it, they will brake and hope they stop in time, only in exceptional circumstances would they actively choose to crash their car in preference to braking as hard as possible.

The car following used the same line and looked like it was either braking very hard or got very twitchy at around the 0:25 mark, almost ending up crossing the centre line also.

As said in the other thread, the lead car just didn't appear to steer around the corner tightly so I wonder if they knew the road and typically exit that corner wide as its quite bumpy and has a long straight after it, and on this occasion it ended up with a very bad outcome.

21st Century Man

40,912 posts

248 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
Weezywee said:
A second is not an absolute age. Reaction time alone is between 0.3-3 seconds and the marker is 1.5 seconds
0.3 is about right, average reaction time is 0.25

Up to 3 seconds doesn't sound right as within a normal range to me, you'd be running into the back of people in ordinary traffic and would certainly fail a driving test.

768

13,682 posts

96 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
Reaction times are different when it's not in response to an expected stimulus with a known response. 0.2-0.3s is what you might expect for a starting pistol or lights going out when you just have to gun it in a straight line. They'll be longer for something like this.

21st Century Man

40,912 posts

248 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
Well yes, it's the decision making on top too.

timrud

364 posts

173 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
I know that road well.

Its awful driving, compounded by a poor handling car.

darren f

982 posts

213 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
‘There but for the grace of God go I’. I’m sure many of us (PH driving Gods excepted) know the feeling of a tightening-on-exit corner and how it can put you in a less than ideal road position. But IME this only normally comes into play when driving let’s say ‘enthusiastically’, this incident is different as the speeds are not mental. As others have said It does look like a case of lack of attention or distraction. I seriously think you can discount understeer, assuming the road is dry and in good condition and the tyres are A1, the amount of mechanical grip an Impreza has is significant, they simply do not slide across the road at 50mph.

From the footage and Google Maps I am a bit surprised the corner is not signed, or has ‘slow’ road paint or chevrons. Or is it comparatively not that severe for the Peaks (otherwise it’d be wall-to-wall signage up there I’d have thought)?

The ‘air’ the poor biker gets is eek though. Here’s hoping he can make the best recovery possible.

FrenchCarFan

6,759 posts

205 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
DJP said:
Horrible incident but if that biker had been in a car they'd probably both be dead.

Being flung over the top of the car is probably what saved him/them.
A little bit of that. Largely the airbag suit he was wearing.

Wooda80

1,743 posts

75 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
Weezywee said:
At the time he wasnt going excessively fast, and there must be more to it to get that charge from previous driving. That or he will appeal and have it quashed.
He pleaded guilty.

zarjaz1991

3,480 posts

123 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
Wooda80 said:
He pleaded guilty.
Indeed. He could only appeal the sentence, not the conviction.