The "S**t Driving Caught On Cam" Thread (Vol 5)

The "S**t Driving Caught On Cam" Thread (Vol 5)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

NGRhodes

1,291 posts

73 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2021
quotequote all
OllieJolly said:
NGRhodes said:
To give the DCW their dues, when the van came at them, he was driving perfectly reasonably and under no obligation to move to let the van past.
Van driver was rather keen to jump out, I wonder what hand signals the DCW was using ?
I agree with regards to no obligation to move over, however doing so would have meant that that event wouldn't have even occurred.
Discretion is always handy in such environments.

Definitely an element of creating a problem for the camera, in my view, especially when they've just done a similar manoeuvre.
Agreed, not their job to police the roads.

carreauchompeur

17,852 posts

205 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2021
quotequote all
Traffic Cops, Ch5 now...

Speeding at 150mph for extended distance...

3 month ban!!?!

Jeez

mackie1

8,153 posts

234 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2021
quotequote all
Yeah I thought that was quite lenient!

Kawasicki

13,094 posts

236 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2021
quotequote all
littlebasher said:
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
That's a straight piece of road coming up to a junction. Texting would be my guess

Why report that the landlord is left with a £30K bill though, haven't they heard of insurance.

That being said, It's the driver I feel worse for. If he's injured he'll end up in the QA hospital.
Article states that there are calls for the limit to be reduced to 40 mph. 40 mph and not looking out the windscreen is still quite dangerous though! 20 mph and not looking out the windscreen is fairly safe, so that should also be considered.

South tdf

1,530 posts

196 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
littlebasher said:
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
That's a straight piece of road coming up to a junction. Texting would be my guess

Why report that the landlord is left with a £30K bill though, haven't they heard of insurance.

That being said, It's the driver I feel worse for. If he's injured he'll end up in the QA hospital.
I know the road well, it’s not straight by any means but there is a give way junction just after the pub so I would expect they have come down the hill and locked up when they realised they had to slow down, the road surface is also very poor there due to water running off the fields and freezing.

saaby93

32,038 posts

179 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
littlebasher said:
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
That's a straight piece of road coming up to a junction. Texting would be my guess

Why report that the landlord is left with a £30K bill though, haven't they heard of insurance.

That being said, It's the driver I feel worse for. If he's injured he'll end up in the QA hospital.
Article states that there are calls for the limit to be reduced to 40 mph. 40 mph and not looking out the windscreen is still quite dangerous though! 20 mph and not looking out the windscreen is fairly safe, so that should also be considered.
Speed limits dont deal with those type of accidents

Shifty Bloke

187 posts

163 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
I'm not sure about that - part of me thinks he's just one of those slow-thinking types. He waits for a decent-sized gap to open up in the other lane then starts to move left, then reacts like molasses again twice... Or does he? Hard to tell without audio to give it away.

Evel the biker looks like he rides like an absolute lunatic in the following clips, way too fast
Not only that, more that he's filtering through reasonably moving traffic with junctions close by, silliness

saaby93

32,038 posts

179 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
Shifty Bloke said:
Krikkit said:
I'm not sure about that - part of me thinks he's just one of those slow-thinking types. He waits for a decent-sized gap to open up in the other lane then starts to move left, then reacts like molasses again twice... Or does he? Hard to tell without audio to give it away.

Evel the biker looks like he rides like an absolute lunatic in the following clips, way too fast
Not only that, more that he's filtering through reasonably moving traffic with junctions close by, silliness
Probably hoping to capture some decent dash cam footage
to post from hospital

WackyWeaver

53 posts

39 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
carreauchompeur said:
Traffic Cops, Ch5 now...

Speeding at 150mph for extended distance...

3 month ban!!?!

Jeez
Not referring your example there but makes me laugh when it’s drug dealers etc using a Corsa as a getaway car when you see the amount of Cupras, Golf Rs and powerful beemers the traffic cops are using now.

The Mazda 3 speed the other week was impressive through.

RazerSauber

2,287 posts

61 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
carreauchompeur said:
Traffic Cops, Ch5 now...

Speeding at 150mph for extended distance...

3 month ban!!?!

Jeez
Definitely a bit soft that. Might have cost him his job travelling though. Never seen a policy chase with a run at 150mph though!

Wonder if the 335d the speeder was driving has been mapped..

Psycho Warren

3,087 posts

114 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
Vipers said:
So he drives down a turn right lane, over broken lines to beat the queu and moans at the van driver, good one.
Although to be fair, at the point the van driver was on the wrong side, he was well within his rights to stand his ground. He lost all rights to moan about it with his previous driving though. Someone could have done the same to him earlier on and hed have been stuffed also.

saaby93

32,038 posts

179 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
Psycho Warren said:
Vipers said:
So he drives down a turn right lane, over broken lines to beat the queu and moans at the van driver, good one.
Although to be fair, at the point the van driver was on the wrong side, .
Not really.
Treat the traffic waiting for the tip as 'parked'.
The road was wide enough for the van driver to pass the parked traffic with care and numpty DCW had already done the same at the beginning of the clip.

Psycho Warren

3,087 posts

114 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
Shifty Bloke said:
Not only that, more that he's filtering through reasonably moving traffic with junctions close by, silliness
Its not legally or technically still filtering when the traffic is moving at speed. it is merely overtaking and like any overtaking manouver the obligation is on the person overtaking to find safe space to do it. So many bikers seem to think that because slow speed filtering is legal, that they can basically overtake like idiots through traffic moving at speed and "expect" people to make way for them. Im all for being bike aware etc but sometimes they dont help themselves.

Psycho Warren

3,087 posts

114 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
Not really.
Treat the traffic waiting for the tip as 'parked'.
The road was wide enough for the van driver to pass the parked traffic with care and numpty DCW had already done the same at the beginning of the clip.
They aren't parked though. They are in a que. The cars in the que should have probably been more over to the kerb to make room on the road. Thus the van wouldn't need to be totally on wrong side of the road. Its no different to the impatient people you see zooming past a que of cars at traffic lights to go into the empty turn right lane.

You might be able to argue the prolonged que made it exceptional circumstances but how did the van know they were all waiting for the tip? How did he know the path was clear to even get back to the correct lane? He didn't. They were both bellends for going on the wrong side like they did but that doesnt mean the van was right because the car had been a bellend earlier out of sight.

Psycho Warren

3,087 posts

114 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
NGRhodes said:
Agreed, not their job to police the roads.
True. However I will block people going the wrong way down a one way. There are a few one ways round my local city that were former rat runs and made one way to stop them being a rat run. However quite a few drivers still take the piss as they can usually get away with it.

They know exactly what they are doing is wrong so I will stop them from doing it. legally and morally I am 100% right in doing so. Sure the "easier" option is to let them pass. However often the types of drivers who go down the wrong way are asshole bullies. Few occasions I've come across them and theyve expected ME to find somewhere to pull over to let them pass. No buddy, you have no right to be where you are so why the hell would i get out of their way, they can get out of mine. People like that need a lesson teaching them otherwise they will continue to drive that way. I would put money if they are aggressive and trying to bully their way through when they are illegally driving down a road that they do that all the time in other situations too so someone standing up to them might teach them a lesson.

But then Im a bit of a towards others who do me "wrong" anyway - eg I will happily block the hard shoulder in grid lock traffic to stop all the rich morons in german cars driving up the hard shoulder. No blue lights, no emergency services ID card, not getting through - wait like everyone else.

saaby93

32,038 posts

179 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
Psycho Warren said:
saaby93 said:
Not really.
Treat the traffic waiting for the tip as 'parked'.
The road was wide enough for the van driver to pass the parked traffic with care and numpty DCW had already done the same at the beginning of the clip.
They aren't parked though. They are in a que. The cars in the que should have probably been more over to the kerb to make room on the road. Thus the van wouldn't need to be totally on wrong side of the road. Its no different to the impatient people you see zooming past a que of cars at traffic lights to go into the empty turn right lane.

You might be able to argue the prolonged que made it exceptional circumstances but how did the van know they were all waiting for the tip? How did he know the path was clear to even get back to the correct lane? He didn't. They were both bellends for going on the wrong side like they did but that doesnt mean the van was right because the car had been a bellend earlier out of sight.
oh c'mon
Anyone knowing that's the queue for tip would be doing what the van driver was doing (and the numpty DCW earlier) - carefully passing the queue to continue their journey. Treat the queue as any other obstruction.

OllieJolly

348 posts

117 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
Psycho Warren said:
True. However I will block people going the wrong way down a one way. There are a few one ways round my local city that were former rat runs and made one way to stop them being a rat run. However quite a few drivers still take the piss as they can usually get away with it.

They know exactly what they are doing is wrong so I will stop them from doing it. legally and morally I am 100% right in doing so. Sure the "easier" option is to let them pass. However often the types of drivers who go down the wrong way are asshole bullies. Few occasions I've come across them and theyve expected ME to find somewhere to pull over to let them pass. No buddy, you have no right to be where you are so why the hell would i get out of their way, they can get out of mine. People like that need a lesson teaching them otherwise they will continue to drive that way. I would put money if they are aggressive and trying to bully their way through when they are illegally driving down a road that they do that all the time in other situations too so someone standing up to them might teach them a lesson.

But then Im a bit of a towards others who do me "wrong" anyway - eg I will happily block the hard shoulder in grid lock traffic to stop all the rich morons in german cars driving up the hard shoulder. No blue lights, no emergency services ID card, not getting through - wait like everyone else.
You make it sound like you're in the right in this post, but you're not, I'm afraid.
That's all.




Blu3R

2,373 posts

200 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
carreauchompeur said:
Traffic Cops, Ch5 now...

Speeding at 150mph for extended distance...

3 month ban!!?!

Jeez
Worryingly for some that's almost worth the risk...

FunkyNige

8,891 posts

276 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
Psycho Warren said:
rich morons in german cars
So close to having sympathy for your Psycho Warren!

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
Blu3R said:
carreauchompeur said:
Traffic Cops, Ch5 now...

Speeding at 150mph for extended distance...

3 month ban!!?!

Jeez
Worryingly for some that's almost worth the risk...
I was amazed at that as well.

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED