RE: Shed of the Week | Alfa Romeo 166

RE: Shed of the Week | Alfa Romeo 166

Author
Discussion

NGK210

2,936 posts

145 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
Slow, thirsty, unreliable, WWD, and judging by owners’ comments, not engaging to drive. Umm?
But, nice chairs and the exterior looks cool. Until viewed from the side. Those front and rear overhangs are vast, it looks deformed - did it share its platform with the smaller Stilo??
Sono fuori.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
GravelMachineGun said:
Feel perhaps like I'm the only one who thinks this is an ugly box? Alfa have made some great looking motors, this isn't one of them.
Have a look at the pre-facelift model, you might reconsider. It looks like a depressed blobfish.

16simon

53 posts

132 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
NGK210 said:
Slow, thirsty, unreliable, WWD, and judging by owners’ comments, not engaging to drive. Umm?
But, nice chairs and the exterior looks cool. Until viewed from the side. Those front and rear overhangs are vast, it looks deformed - did it share its platform with the smaller Stilo??
Sono fuori.
Fuori di testa?

greenarrow

3,595 posts

117 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
NGK210 said:
Slow, thirsty, unreliable, WWD, and judging by owners’ comments, not engaging to drive. Umm?
But, nice chairs and the exterior looks cool. Until viewed from the side. Those front and rear overhangs are vast, it looks deformed - did it share its platform with the smaller Stilo??
Sono fuori.
Unreliable? The owner says not a single thing broke, unlike his BMWs and Mercs, so not sure why you feel this particular car will be unreliable.

I agree its not very quick, the 4 cylinder Alfas of that era seemed to be rather under-engined compared with the opposition.

A lot of car for £800 though and different to the herd.

carinaman

21,294 posts

172 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
NGK210 said:
Slow, thirsty, unreliable, WWD, and judging by owners’ comments, not engaging to drive. Umm?
But, nice chairs and the exterior looks cool. Until viewed from the side. Those front and rear overhangs are vast, it looks deformed - did it share its platform with the smaller Stilo??
Sono fuori.
Apparently it was due to be released before the 156, but Fiat/Alfa high ups weren't impressed with the longer front and back ends and the way it drove so they sent it back to be reworked before release meaning it hit the market after the 156.

Launch reviews said the 2 litre Twin Spark drove better than the V6 due to less weight in the nose.

Timberwolf

5,344 posts

218 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
alorotom said:
Alfa interiors always look so wonderful and inviting - much nice than the standard german fare of the same era.
Indeed - I've driven both generations of 5 series the 166 went up against and while the E39 in particular had a certain charm in how unrelentingly competent it was, I think you would struggle to spend much time describing the interior without an early landing on the word "efficient".

When I settle behind the wheel of my own standard German fare there is certainly much to commend it over my Alfa experiences. Everything is well laid-out and legible. Switchgear is in sensible places for it to be, rather than inexplicably on the floor, roof or the passenger side of the central tunnel. Storage consists of substantial bins and boxes rather than apologetic indentations designed to fling your accoutrements about the cabin at the first sign of cornering. The starting procedure does not require gathering errant pieces of trim from the footwell and a futile prod at the peeled-up corner of an airbag cover. I have a dial which shows me how much fuel and range I have left rather than an elegant Milanese denial of responsibility for the task of discovering whether there may or may not be petrol today. And indeed, while it may be the lowest of the motoring hack clichés there is some tiny satisfaction in switches and stalks which engage with a weighted click rather than the resistanceless feeling they are one operation away from pinging off into some forgotten interior crevasse.

And yet... it is worthy but dull. There is no design or sense of flair, there is a collection of shapes which are in places merely because they needed to be there. There is nothing there like the feeling of sinking into an Alfa cockpit, staring down twin dials that evoke GTA Juniors and snarling twin cams. There is no incongruous wooden steering wheel elevating your commute to the level of Nuvolari wrestling some prewar beast. Even when the reality was slightly closer to frustrating exploration of the dynamic limitations of a Tipo-derived chassis than feeling racing heritage with every turn of the steering wheel, I still find it hard to look at a photo of an Alfa interior and not feel the urge to jump in and drive.

DrFelix

3 posts

54 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
But of course I'd want the one with the Busso engine...

NGK210

2,936 posts

145 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
greenarrow said:
NGK210 said:
Slow, thirsty, unreliable, WWD, and judging by owners’ comments, not engaging to drive. Umm?
But, nice chairs and the exterior looks cool. Until viewed from the side. Those front and rear overhangs are vast, it looks deformed - did it share its platform with the smaller Stilo??
Sono fuori.
Unreliable? The owner says not a single thing broke, unlike his BMWs and Mercs, so not sure why you feel this particular car will be unreliable.

I agree its not very quick, the 4 cylinder Alfas of that era seemed to be rather under-engined compared with the opposition.

A lot of car for £800 though and different to the herd.
Easy tiger! I wrote: “owners’ “, which is plural, not “owner’s”, which is singular, so I wasn’t referring to the car and owner from the Shed ad and article.

Edited by NGK210 on Friday 20th March 17:16

soad

32,898 posts

176 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
DrFelix said:
But of course I'd want the one with the Busso engine...
Don’t we all. hehe

alorotom

11,941 posts

187 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
Timberwolf said:
Indeed - I've driven both generations of 5 series the 166 went up against and while the E39 in particular had a certain charm in how unrelentingly competent it was, I think you would struggle to spend much time describing the interior without an early landing on the word "efficient".

When I settle behind the wheel of my own standard German fare there is certainly much to commend it over my Alfa experiences. Everything is well laid-out and legible. Switchgear is in sensible places for it to be, rather than inexplicably on the floor, roof or the passenger side of the central tunnel. Storage consists of substantial bins and boxes rather than apologetic indentations designed to fling your accoutrements about the cabin at the first sign of cornering. The starting procedure does not require gathering errant pieces of trim from the footwell and a futile prod at the peeled-up corner of an airbag cover. I have a dial which shows me how much fuel and range I have left rather than an elegant Milanese denial of responsibility for the task of discovering whether there may or may not be petrol today. And indeed, while it may be the lowest of the motoring hack clichés there is some tiny satisfaction in switches and stalks which engage with a weighted click rather than the resistanceless feeling they are one operation away from pinging off into some forgotten interior crevasse.

And yet... it is worthy but dull. There is no design or sense of flair, there is a collection of shapes which are in places merely because they needed to be there. There is nothing there like the feeling of sinking into an Alfa cockpit, staring down twin dials that evoke GTA Juniors and snarling twin cams. There is no incongruous wooden steering wheel elevating your commute to the level of Nuvolari wrestling some prewar beast. Even when the reality was slightly closer to frustrating exploration of the dynamic limitations of a Tipo-derived chassis than feeling racing heritage with every turn of the steering wheel, I still find it hard to look at a photo of an Alfa interior and not feel the urge to jump in and drive.
What a wonderfully written piece, thank you smile (no sarcasm intended)

sjabrown

1,916 posts

160 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
A good old Alfa shed.

I think of these like women you'd like to shag but really really shouldn't.

el romeral

1,054 posts

137 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
Great shed with the most wonderful looking interior. Those rear seats look so comfy.

Uncle John

4,287 posts

191 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
sjabrown said:
A good old Alfa shed.

I think of these like women you'd like to shag but really really shouldn't.
Ha ha!!

Brilliant.

Mr Tidy

22,344 posts

127 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
Well it's good to see Shed back on form!

I think the 166 looks fantastic, but I can't help thinking that fitted with the TS engine it's looks are making promises that the engine won't be able to deliver.

Still for £800 how wrong can it go?

llcoolmac

217 posts

100 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
GravelMachineGun said:
Feel perhaps like I'm the only one who thinks this is an ugly box? Alfa have made some great looking motors, this isn't one of them.
eel perhaps like I'm the only one who thinks this is an ugly box? Alfa have made some great looking motors, this isn't one of them.
I'm sorry but you are objectively wrong. I had a 16,000 miler last year in pristine condition. Everyone, and I literally mean everyone, I met commented on how beautiful a car it was. And I guarantee you would too. The detailing on it was sublime. Even details like the chrome door handles.

The front end is certainly controversial but the side profile is absolutely perfect. It's the most perfect fwd side profile I've ever seen and the interior is absolutely stunning to this day. Still looks incredible.

A1VDY

3,575 posts

127 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
OK for a general runabout pos.
Being what it is though it needs to be the £495 category..

to3m

1,226 posts

170 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
THE SPICE MUST FLOW.

That's all I can think of when I see these.

Kinky

39,562 posts

269 months

Friday 20th March 2020
quotequote all
Earl of Petrol said:
Looking for a nice V6 GTV or Brera now....,
Julian @ Alfa Aid has a to-die-for GTV cloud9

It's not up on their website or AT yet, but I'm pretty sure it'll go quickly. It really is something else!

I'm so so seriously tempted. And to be 100% honest, if I did not have a gearbox issue on my current Alfa I WOULD be trading it in!

AMGSee55

634 posts

102 months

Saturday 21st March 2020
quotequote all
Lovely old thing and cracking value. I don’t see the performance as an issue either. The equivalent 520i wasn’t significantly faster, nor were the 2.0 litre A6 and E-class offerings of that era and the twin-spark is arguably at its best when given a good ragging anyway.
I’d love to own it, but having one Alfa tests the patience of SWMBO - two would be pushing my luck hehe

AMGSee55

634 posts

102 months

Saturday 21st March 2020
quotequote all
alorotom said:
Timberwolf said:
Indeed - I've driven both generations of 5 series the 166 went up against and while the E39 in particular had a certain charm in how unrelentingly competent it was, I think you would struggle to spend much time describing the interior without an early landing on the word "efficient".

When I settle behind the wheel of my own standard German fare there is certainly much to commend it over my Alfa experiences. Everything is well laid-out and legible. Switchgear is in sensible places for it to be, rather than inexplicably on the floor, roof or the passenger side of the central tunnel. Storage consists of substantial bins and boxes rather than apologetic indentations designed to fling your accoutrements about the cabin at the first sign of cornering. The starting procedure does not require gathering errant pieces of trim from the footwell and a futile prod at the peeled-up corner of an airbag cover. I have a dial which shows me how much fuel and range I have left rather than an elegant Milanese denial of responsibility for the task of discovering whether there may or may not be petrol today. And indeed, while it may be the lowest of the motoring hack clichés there is some tiny satisfaction in switches and stalks which engage with a weighted click rather than the resistanceless feeling they are one operation away from pinging off into some forgotten interior crevasse.

And yet... it is worthy but dull. There is no design or sense of flair, there is a collection of shapes which are in places merely because they needed to be there. There is nothing there like the feeling of sinking into an Alfa cockpit, staring down twin dials that evoke GTA Juniors and snarling twin cams. There is no incongruous wooden steering wheel elevating your commute to the level of Nuvolari wrestling some prewar beast. Even when the reality was slightly closer to frustrating exploration of the dynamic limitations of a Tipo-derived chassis than feeling racing heritage with every turn of the steering wheel, I still find it hard to look at a photo of an Alfa interior and not feel the urge to jump in and drive.
What a wonderfully written piece, thank you smile (no sarcasm intended)
+1 - brilliantly observed wink