Best smoker barges 1-5 large [Vol 16]

Best smoker barges 1-5 large [Vol 16]

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

biggbn

23,468 posts

221 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
Macron said:
Diesel schmiesel, Honda Accord Tourer, 2.4 petrol with all the toys, mid thread, as good economy as a Volvo with none of the DPF/ EGR stuff. Plenty are cheaper, inc the 2.0 with better economy again.

https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...

And yes, it looks like a hearse, but a V70 is hardly a Vogue cover model. And no, the rugged looks of the XC are not going to make Martin from Accounts look like an outdoorsy type. It’s an estate.
Cracking cars. Always wanted a 2.4 type s tourer , or the executive for thread status!!

Krikkit

26,544 posts

182 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
CharlesdeGaulle said:
Speed addicted said:
swampy442 said:
CharlesdeGaulle said:
Mind you I don't really care -I filled up with 98 RON Super Plus at 45 cents/litre yesterday
Why has nobody acknowledged this fact?!
I was too busy being jealous.
Sorry chaps, don't mean to be glib. To offset that, my insurance premium is 4 times what it was in UK. Swings and roundabouts...
Swings and roundabouts indeed, ouch.

Is it a UK-centric thing that our car insurance is so cheap?

Bonefish Blues

26,842 posts

224 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
biggbn said:
Weas said:
W00DY said:
Thanks guys, lots of good stuff there. I did like that example as I tend to think diesels like to work and miles area, but 4c shocks is probably one to avoid, although it is very close so possibly worth a look. 35mpg is a bit disappointing though. XC70 would be nice for mountain biking duites.

The golf is on 216k and will want a new clutch'/flywheel and probably a DPF clean in the next year as well as the belt is coming up, so don't know whether to sell it while it's working well and get something a bit bigger/more bargey or to put the money in knowing it's been good so far and 60mpg and cheap tax/insurance means it'll pay it back soon enough assuming nothing explodes soon.
35mpg was with lord gears, I'm sure the manual would do better on fuel.
I had the older shape d5 manual and it was an easy 45mpg car, more on a run...but i am not a fast driver. Wonderful cars and bloody cheap now.
My E3 D5 S60 will do 45+, with a very best of 53ish. Our old XC70, also E3 D5 auto was low 30s, just as the current one. 40 (real, not indicated, because a liar) perhaps attainable on a long motorway journey.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
biggbn said:
Weas said:
W00DY said:
Thanks guys, lots of good stuff there. I did like that example as I tend to think diesels like to work and miles area, but 4c shocks is probably one to avoid, although it is very close so possibly worth a look. 35mpg is a bit disappointing though. XC70 would be nice for mountain biking duites.

The golf is on 216k and will want a new clutch'/flywheel and probably a DPF clean in the next year as well as the belt is coming up, so don't know whether to sell it while it's working well and get something a bit bigger/more bargey or to put the money in knowing it's been good so far and 60mpg and cheap tax/insurance means it'll pay it back soon enough assuming nothing explodes soon.
35mpg was with lord gears, I'm sure the manual would do better on fuel.
I had the older shape d5 manual and it was an easy 45mpg car, more on a run...but i am not a fast driver. Wonderful cars and bloody cheap now.
The 185bhp P3 V70 will do OK, I've found that every Volvo I had will hit it's official mixed figures for me if you drive it moderately sensibly and I averaged low 40s from a P3 S80 with that engine, but the early twin turbo ~200bhp models were apparently quite a lot thirstier which they then fixed in the 215 ish BHP ones. The 215bhp XC60 my ex wife (hissss) has will do high 30s average, although she drives like the <snip> she is so averages high 20s, and I am sure that engine is absolutely brilliant in a nice light S60 or V60.

It's the earlier 2001-2004/5 ish P2 cars with the 163bhp D5 with less emissions controls and a manual gearbox that is supposedly a 50mpg+ car. They're slow though, the 185bhp is noticeably livelier and more refined. Also who wants to dawdle around in a slow smoke belching Volvo changing their own gears?

BigBen

11,650 posts

231 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
swampy442 said:
CharlesdeGaulle said:
Mind you I don't really care -I filled up with 98 RON Super Plus at 45 cents/litre yesterday
Why has nobody acknowledged this fact?!
I don't know why I bother sometimes........

BigBen said:
That would almost make a trip to Lux in the DB9 self funding. Slight snag with the 20L fuel tank or whatever stupidly small size it is (it might not be small at all it might just use fuel at a prodigious rate)

Ben

biggbn

23,468 posts

221 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
stickleback123 said:
biggbn said:
Weas said:
W00DY said:
Thanks guys, lots of good stuff there. I did like that example as I tend to think diesels like to work and miles area, but 4c shocks is probably one to avoid, although it is very close so possibly worth a look. 35mpg is a bit disappointing though. XC70 would be nice for mountain biking duites.

The golf is on 216k and will want a new clutch'/flywheel and probably a DPF clean in the next year as well as the belt is coming up, so don't know whether to sell it while it's working well and get something a bit bigger/more bargey or to put the money in knowing it's been good so far and 60mpg and cheap tax/insurance means it'll pay it back soon enough assuming nothing explodes soon.
35mpg was with lord gears, I'm sure the manual would do better on fuel.
I had the older shape d5 manual and it was an easy 45mpg car, more on a run...but i am not a fast driver. Wonderful cars and bloody cheap now.
The 185bhp P3 V70 will do OK, I've found that every Volvo I had will hit it's official mixed figures for me if you drive it moderately sensibly and I averaged low 40s from a P3 S80 with that engine, but the early twin turbo ~200bhp models were apparently quite a lot thirstier which they then fixed in the 215 ish BHP ones. The 215bhp XC60 my ex wife (hissss) has will do high 30s average, although she drives like the <snip> she is so averages high 20s, and I am sure that engine is absolutely brilliant in a nice light S60 or V60.

It's the earlier 2001-2004/5 ish P2 cars with the 163bhp D5 with less emissions controls and a manual gearbox that is supposedly a 50mpg+ car. They're slow though, the 185bhp is noticeably livelier and more refined. Also who wants to dawdle around in a slow smoke belching Volvo changing their own gears?
I'm ashamed to say, as a volvo fan and having owned loads of them, that im not sure what mine was but think it would have been the 163 hp with manual box. It never felt slow, always returned mid 40s and over 50 on runs so yes, you would be right in saying that. I think the lower power with the manual box are the best for longevity and economy.

The Don of Croy

6,002 posts

160 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
LetsTryAgain said:
CharlesdeGaulle said:
I'm out of touch. I think 35 mpg would be pretty extraordinary. Mind you I don't really care - I filled up with 98 RON Super Plus at 45 cents/litre yesterday.
Wasn’t he discussing the D5 specifically though?
If a diesel can’t manage 35 MPG pulling a normal car around, you’ve got to wonder why anyone would buy one.
My P1 V70 2.4 petrol is returning 30+ in mixed motoring, nearer 37 on longer cruises, despite the inherent danger of using the AW 5 speed auto. Brilliant car and possibly the best value motor I’ve ever had.

But I prefer ‘borrowing’ my elder sons 335i at present. Mental speed and 26mpg. Not a barge.

As you were.

Bonefish Blues

26,842 posts

224 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
biggbn said:
stickleback123 said:
biggbn said:
Weas said:
W00DY said:
Thanks guys, lots of good stuff there. I did like that example as I tend to think diesels like to work and miles area, but 4c shocks is probably one to avoid, although it is very close so possibly worth a look. 35mpg is a bit disappointing though. XC70 would be nice for mountain biking duites.

The golf is on 216k and will want a new clutch'/flywheel and probably a DPF clean in the next year as well as the belt is coming up, so don't know whether to sell it while it's working well and get something a bit bigger/more bargey or to put the money in knowing it's been good so far and 60mpg and cheap tax/insurance means it'll pay it back soon enough assuming nothing explodes soon.
35mpg was with lord gears, I'm sure the manual would do better on fuel.
I had the older shape d5 manual and it was an easy 45mpg car, more on a run...but i am not a fast driver. Wonderful cars and bloody cheap now.
The 185bhp P3 V70 will do OK, I've found that every Volvo I had will hit it's official mixed figures for me if you drive it moderately sensibly and I averaged low 40s from a P3 S80 with that engine, but the early twin turbo ~200bhp models were apparently quite a lot thirstier which they then fixed in the 215 ish BHP ones. The 215bhp XC60 my ex wife (hissss) has will do high 30s average, although she drives like the <snip> she is so averages high 20s, and I am sure that engine is absolutely brilliant in a nice light S60 or V60.

It's the earlier 2001-2004/5 ish P2 cars with the 163bhp D5 with less emissions controls and a manual gearbox that is supposedly a 50mpg+ car. They're slow though, the 185bhp is noticeably livelier and more refined. Also who wants to dawdle around in a slow smoke belching Volvo changing their own gears?
I'm ashamed to say, as a volvo fan and having owned loads of them, that im not sure what mine was but think it would have been the 163 hp with manual box. It never felt slow, always returned mid 40s and over 50 on runs so yes, you would be right in saying that. I think the lower power with the manual box are the best for longevity and economy.
Black engine cover? Euro 3 163 bhp.
Grey? Either Euro 4 163 bhp (an odd and short-lived anomaly, badged 2.4D) or Euro 4 185 bhp.

Bonefish Blues

26,842 posts

224 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
The Don of Croy said:
My P1 V70 2.4 petrol is returning 30+ in mixed motoring, nearer 37 on longer cruises, despite the inherent danger of using the AW 5 speed auto. Brilliant car and possibly the best value motor I’ve ever had.

But I prefer ‘borrowing’ my elder sons 335i at present. Mental speed and 26mpg. Not a barge.

As you were.
That's remarkable for that engine. It likes a drink.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
I'll admit something shameful here; I had the later D5, in 180bhp tune, in a C70 convertible for quite a while and it was really very good. Engine refinement was poor, plenty of vibration, and I know diesel convertibles are frowned upon by anyone civilised, but with the roof down that D5 engine made an absolutely filthy five cylinder snarl with lots of turbo whooshing. I’ll go out on a limb here and say that driven hard it sounded superb. I had it remapped to 220bhp and it went well, even if it did eat two clutches, a DMF, a gearbox, and both driveshafts.

I'd have preferred a T5 petrol but they sold in tiny numbers from 2008 onwards. My P2 V70 T5 auto was capable of great economy if you drove it carefully, high 30s on a run was possibly and a low 30s mixed average. Closer to 25mpg if you used it around town and used it properly.

CharlesdeGaulle

26,315 posts

181 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
stickleback123 said:
My P2 V70 T5 auto was capable of great economy if you drove it carefully, high 30s on a run was possibly and a low 30s mixed average. Closer to 25mpg if you used it around town and used it properly.
My old P2 T5 auto had a lifetime average of 28 I think. Exactly the same as the current Lexus as a matter of fact. That's my benchmark for what is 'average'.

Bonefish Blues

26,842 posts

224 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
stickleback123 said:
I'd have preferred a T5 petrol but they sold in tiny numbers from 2008 onwards. My P2 V70 T5 auto was capable of great economy if you drove it carefully, high 30s on a run was possibly and a low 30s mixed average. Closer to 25mpg if you used it around town and used it properly.
I'm on the low side of 25 on my first full tank on mine. Cruising back up the A34 after I collected it was a different matter, and in the high 30s.

BlueMR2

8,657 posts

203 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
The iCarsoft CR Pro has arrived now.

Inside it's outer box is a branded (nylon? ) carry case which contains the CR pro itself, the OBD2 cable together with a usb cable (for the updates i'd imagine) and a little folded paper instruction leaflet.

Thinking about whether to buy the red 38 pin adapter for older Mercedes so I can plug it into the S210 as well, an extra £45 though.

Usget

5,426 posts

212 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
BigBen said:
swampy442 said:
CharlesdeGaulle said:
Mind you I don't really care -I filled up with 98 RON Super Plus at 45 cents/litre yesterday
Why has nobody acknowledged this fact?!
I don't know why I bother sometimes........

BigBen said:
That would almost make a trip to Lux in the DB9 self funding. Slight snag with the 20L fuel tank or whatever stupidly small size it is (it might not be small at all it might just use fuel at a prodigious rate)

Ben
Fit a motorsport tank and head over for a petrolhead version of a booze cruise. Like PPBB and his 1000-mile-per-tank 911

biggbn

23,468 posts

221 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
stickleback123 said:
I'll admit something shameful here; I had the later D5, in 180bhp tune, in a C70 convertible for quite a while and it was really very good. Engine refinement was poor, plenty of vibration, and I know diesel convertibles are frowned upon by anyone civilised, but with the roof down that D5 engine made an absolutely filthy five cylinder snarl with lots of turbo whooshing. I’ll go out on a limb here and say that driven hard it sounded superb. I had it remapped to 220bhp and it went well, even if it did eat two clutches, a DMF, a gearbox, and both driveshafts.

I'd have preferred a T5 petrol but they sold in tiny numbers from 2008 onwards. My P2 V70 T5 auto was capable of great economy if you drove it carefully, high 30s on a run was possibly and a low 30s mixed average. Closer to 25mpg if you used it around town and used it properly.
I love a diesel convertible. Low down grunt suits the laid back style any convertible encourages. Shameful admission no 1078, one of my favourite cars owned out of over 200 was my 150k mile (180 when sold I think) 1.9 tdi beetle convertible. Simple, fun, comfy, so much more than a golf with an unfortunate hat on. I would have another tomorrow as a family fun car!!

Krikkit

26,544 posts

182 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
BlueMR2 said:
Thinking about whether to buy the red 38 pin adapter for older Mercedes so I can plug it into the S210 as well, an extra £45 though.
I'd get a cheap eBay one, just an adapter from OBD2 to the special pinout.

Macron

9,897 posts

167 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
biggbn said:
I love a diesel convertible.
Say whut now?

21st Century Man

40,943 posts

249 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
Macron said:
biggbn said:
I love a diesel convertible.
Say whut now?

biggbn

23,468 posts

221 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
21st Century Man said:
Macron said:
biggbn said:
I love a diesel convertible.
Say whut now?
I love the sound of clatter in the morning...

21st Century Man

40,943 posts

249 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
I do like a bit of TDi shove, short-lived though it is.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED