McLaren smashed up in car park
Discussion
RJH777 said:
so called said:
Yes, I'm not too impressed by the roof collapsing so much.
Mt daughters Corsa survived much better when she rolled it.
In fairness, an Audi Q5 probably weighs more than the pressure exerted by a Corsa on it's own roof.Mt daughters Corsa survived much better when she rolled it.
I keep going back to this and just thinking...how? Presumably there must have been no cars opposite and they drove straight across the car park at 20+ mph? Surely with the angle of driving down a normal row of cars you couldn't manage that...
Gad-Westy said:
RJH777 said:
so called said:
Yes, I'm not too impressed by the roof collapsing so much.
Mt daughters Corsa survived much better when she rolled it.
In fairness, an Audi Q5 probably weighs more than the pressure exerted by a Corsa on it's own roof.Mt daughters Corsa survived much better when she rolled it.
I keep going back to this and just thinking...how? Presumably there must have been no cars opposite and they drove straight across the car park at 20+ mph? Surely with the angle of driving down a normal row of cars you couldn't manage that...
Still think that it looks quite poor.
MrGTI6 said:
A Vauxhall Carlton?
I care not one toss about the loss of a modern VAG or McLaren. However, that appears to be an Omega GSi being flattened for lolz, there. I can only hope this outrageous act took place many years ago when they were considered expendable tank crush / banger racing / drift-yo fodder.RJH777 said:
so called said:
Yes, I'm not too impressed by the roof collapsing so much.
Mt daughters Corsa survived much better when she rolled it.
In fairness, an Audi Q5 probably weighs more than the pressure exerted by a Corsa on it's own roof.Mt daughters Corsa survived much better when she rolled it.
I keep going back to this and just thinking...how? Presumably there must have been no cars opposite and they drove straight across the car park at 20+ mph? Surely with the angle of driving down a normal row of cars you couldn't manage that...
We helped the three OAPS out the car...
http://pembrokeshire-herald.com/47497/withybush-re...
shed driver said:
astrsxi77 said:
Oooff. The tragic loss of a 1909 DeChester Alfred Forthwith-Pennyspeed, there.
1908 surely. You can tell by the light cluster.(This is how PH works isn't it?)
SD.
so called said:
Gad-Westy said:
RJH777 said:
so called said:
Yes, I'm not too impressed by the roof collapsing so much.
Mt daughters Corsa survived much better when she rolled it.
In fairness, an Audi Q5 probably weighs more than the pressure exerted by a Corsa on it's own roof.Mt daughters Corsa survived much better when she rolled it.
I keep going back to this and just thinking...how? Presumably there must have been no cars opposite and they drove straight across the car park at 20+ mph? Surely with the angle of driving down a normal row of cars you couldn't manage that...
Still think that it looks quite poor.
Edited by Gad-Westy on Friday 23 October 15:49
jeff666 said:
GrizzlyBear said:
So.. what is a Cat-D McLaren going to cost me? all I need is some patent panels? couple of rattle cans... good as new
Cat D no longer exists,Cat N or S and I guess the carpark one will be an S if not a B.
Gad-Westy said:
jeff666 said:
GrizzlyBear said:
So.. what is a Cat-D McLaren going to cost me? all I need is some patent panels? couple of rattle cans... good as new
Cat D no longer exists,Cat N or S and I guess the carpark one will be an S if not a B.
Gad-Westy. I will be honest, I was thinking the same , I thought they were a carbon shell/chassis, and I thought the problem with a carbon fibre shell is that once there is a crack in it, that is it. You need a new one! (well the damaged bit anyway). I am also guessing that needlessly large car might have done a little more than than damage the outer panels.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff