RE: Lotus and Alpine team up for EV sports car
Discussion
Xfe said:
EV zzz...I am not at all convinced that it's possible to make a fun EV (fun in the same way that ICE sports cars are)
There’s reasonable applications for them as drag racers or hill climbers, but the compromises between range and weight don’t yet really favour something one can jump in on a Sunday morning and go have fun for two or three hours. Not to mention that half the fun of a sports car is in the engine noise and the gearshift. MiseryStreak said:
This is fantastic news. I’ll be ready for an electric sports car by 2030, possibly before, and Lotus and Alpine are sure to deliver the best possible.
They just need to find a way of reintroducing a clutch and manual gearbox to an electric powered drivetrain. No, I’m just kidding. I’m going to hold on to an ICE car for that reason. Even if it means sitting in it in the garage and waggling the gearstick whilst making engine noises as petrol will be classified as a biohazard.
So why can't an electric motor not be run via clutch, gearbox, diff as it is now? as in replace the ICE for an electric motor and keep everything else same from a chassis, running gear pov?They just need to find a way of reintroducing a clutch and manual gearbox to an electric powered drivetrain. No, I’m just kidding. I’m going to hold on to an ICE car for that reason. Even if it means sitting in it in the garage and waggling the gearstick whilst making engine noises as petrol will be classified as a biohazard.
its frankenstein, mongrel, inefficient stuff for an EV agreed. But for a sportscar, it would be brilliant wouldn't it?
Fetchez la vache said:
Am I dreaming?
I thought the A110 WAS a collaboration between Lotus and Renault/Alpine - before they had a falling out towards the end of development and Renault/Alpine went it alone?
Caterham and Alpine. I thought the A110 WAS a collaboration between Lotus and Renault/Alpine - before they had a falling out towards the end of development and Renault/Alpine went it alone?
And less a falling out, more a realisation that Caterham couldn't afford to carry on with the development.
kambites said:
I think it would feel very odd to drive unless you artificially hobbled the motor to make it feel more like an ICE.
There are electric converted ICE cars which retain the clutch and gearbox, but they're largely superfluous.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJLdzRJdKrs
RemarkLima said:
After having an i3, which is only 1350 kg, with 4 seats it's very much possible to get weight down and have a 180 mile range.
Personally, that drive train - 180 bhp - in an Elise would be absolutely perfect! I've had sports cars with worse range
That i3 weight is EU - ie with 75kg for a driver included. 1275kg DIN is remarkable.Personally, that drive train - 180 bhp - in an Elise would be absolutely perfect! I've had sports cars with worse range
Edited by RemarkLima on Thursday 14th January 10:22
kambites said:
We'll very soon have a choice between electric new sportscars and no new sportscars, so it can only be a good thing that two of the producers of the very best driver-focussed ICE sports cars currently on sale are teaming up to see what they can do with electric propulsion.
This. Alpine and Lotus are trying to get ahead of the curve here, huge amounts development work and associated costs will be needed to transition away from ICE, and less than 9 years to do it. Makes perfect sense for low volume makers to join forces and share their technology and the development burden.I wonder what the future holds for the likes of Caterham, Morgan, Ariel. I'm not aware there will be any exemptions based on sales volume for ICE cars after 2030, they're all going to have the same challenges.
jwbc1984 said:
To be honest they weren't a bad car - they just divided up the share the wrong way so you got the worst of bothItalian reliability and Nissan styling wasn't the best marriage
Italian Styling and Nissan reliability could have been a winner
Lotobear said:
Clever move by Renault - the Lotus link to chinese battery tech was probably not lost on them!
That said, call me a dinosaur, but the idea of an electric sport car Lotus or otherwise does absolutely nothing for me
i can understand that. buy an Elise now!That said, call me a dinosaur, but the idea of an electric sport car Lotus or otherwise does absolutely nothing for me
However, what would you do if you were Lotus or Alpine charged with making money from new cars?
B'stard Child said:
jwbc1984 said:
To be honest they weren't a bad car - they just divided up the share the wrong way so you got the worst of bothItalian reliability and Nissan styling wasn't the best marriage
Italian Styling and Nissan reliability could have been a winner
Maybe I'm in the minority here but IMO the Sud wasn't much of a looker either. Nicer than a Pulsar I guess.
For Lotus and Alpine.... I hope it works out for them. Personally I think neither brand have traded on their legendary engines in their history so among sportscar manufacturers I think they can make EVs work to their brand easier than most. For Lotus the engine has always just been there to push the car and the performance has always been about the dynamics.
They weren't just about lightness either, the famous quote was simplify, then add lightness. And on that note I would think electric motors may have been right up Colin Chapman's street, an opportunity to gain performance while dumping the complicated, maintenance heavy engine and gearbox.
I can imagine him adopting electric motors just as soon as they became practical enough to run in a sportscar.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff