The "S**t Driving Caught On Cam" Thread (Vol 6)
Discussion
I think the caravan driver (arrogantly) assumed the truck driver was going to yield and was then taken by surprise as his car was dragged sideways.
I've yielded to many people before when technically I shouldn't. I've seen so many dashcam videos of idiots jostling at merges where it seems nothing else matters apart from being first. Maybe I've just mellowed with age, but I'd rather keep my car dent-free.
I've yielded to many people before when technically I shouldn't. I've seen so many dashcam videos of idiots jostling at merges where it seems nothing else matters apart from being first. Maybe I've just mellowed with age, but I'd rather keep my car dent-free.
ro250 said:
I've yielded to many people before when technically I shouldn't. I've seen so many dashcam videos of idiots jostling at merges where it seems nothing else matters apart from being first. Maybe I've just mellowed with age, but I'd rather keep my car dent-free.
Yep.I really don't care that much anymore. It's one car length.
InitialDave said:
ro250 said:
I've yielded to many people before when technically I shouldn't. I've seen so many dashcam videos of idiots jostling at merges where it seems nothing else matters apart from being first. Maybe I've just mellowed with age, but I'd rather keep my car dent-free.
Yep.I really don't care that much anymore. It's one car length.
trackdemon said:
If you've missed your turn off, or are just trying to jump the queue and barge in you don't just move into a lane that already has traffic there - especially so if it's a HGV. The truck could have conceded the space, but why should he? It wasn't him making the mistake.
Just because someone makes a mistake, doesnt mean someone else should make it worse if they can do something about it.Highway code states the obvious when it says everyone has a duty to avoid an incident if they can.
It was as clear as night follows day that the caravan needed to move into lane- the truck could easily have slowed up with losing more than a second or so.
Instead what - how many people held up for how many hours in total - how much in insurance
Just ease up, make way if necessary, dont make a situation worse and try some ogmios
And yes we've done it to dust a number of years ago and there are still people preferring to take the collision as a solution
saaby93 said:
trackdemon said:
If you've missed your turn off, or are just trying to jump the queue and barge in you don't just move into a lane that already has traffic there - especially so if it's a HGV. The truck could have conceded the space, but why should he? It wasn't him making the mistake.
Just because someone makes a mistake, doesnt mean someone else should make it worse if they can do something about it.Highway code states the obvious when it says everyone has a duty to avoid an incident if they can.
It was as clear as night follows day that the caravan needed to move into lane- the truck could easily have slowed up with losing more than a second or so.
Instead what - how many people held up for how many hours in total - how much in insurance
Just ease up, make way if necessary, dont make a situation worse and try some ogmios
And yes we've done it to dust a number of years ago and there are still people preferring to take the collision as a solution
It wasn't hard to not be a knob.
I often see people persist in their righteousness in these situations such as still going for the roundabout exit which someone is cutting them up from. Just abort the move!
Bonefish Blues said:
Ron240 said:
budgie smuggler said:
To avoid a crash inconveniencing thousands of people just so that he doesn't lose one place in a queue of traffic?
Quite right...its better to be an enabler to this type of selfish and arrogant driver.5s Alive said:
Bonefish Blues said:
Ron240 said:
budgie smuggler said:
To avoid a crash inconveniencing thousands of people just so that he doesn't lose one place in a queue of traffic?
Quite right...its better to be an enabler to this type of selfish and arrogant driver.But I can deal with that
Bonefish Blues said:
5s Alive said:
Bonefish Blues said:
Ron240 said:
budgie smuggler said:
To avoid a crash inconveniencing thousands of people just so that he doesn't lose one place in a queue of traffic?
Quite right...its better to be an enabler to this type of selfish and arrogant driver.But I can deal with that
However a driver [E39 (sorry!) 5 series] who was doing 90 in the outside lane presumably steering with his knees while shaving and on his mobile and then braked hard across all three lanes onto the exit slip forcing traffic to take evasive action stretched my patience somewhat.
budgie smuggler said:
trackdemon said:
The truck could have conceded the space, but why should he?
To avoid a crash inconveniencing thousands of people just so that he doesn't lose one place in a queue of traffic? To help somebody out so they don't have to sit stationary in a live motorway lane?
Even in purely selfish terms, he's delayed his own journey by probably at least 20 mins sorting it out, maybe an hour+ depending on how that caravan and vehicle are now wedged against the barrier.
saaby93 said:
trackdemon said:
If you've missed your turn off, or are just trying to jump the queue and barge in you don't just move into a lane that already has traffic there - especially so if it's a HGV. The truck could have conceded the space, but why should he? It wasn't him making the mistake.
Just because someone makes a mistake, doesnt mean someone else should make it worse if they can do something about it.Highway code states the obvious when it says everyone has a duty to avoid an incident if they can.
It was as clear as night follows day that the caravan needed to move into lane- the truck could easily have slowed up with losing more than a second or so.
Instead what - how many people held up for how many hours in total - how much in insurance
Just ease up, make way if necessary, dont make a situation worse and try some ogmios
And yes we've done it to dust a number of years ago and there are still people preferring to take the collision as a solution
"It was as clear as night follows day that the caravan needed to move into lane"
Indeed it was. Just as it was equally clear they were taking the piss, or could have taken the extraordinarily easy option of rectifying their own mistake by carrying on to the next junction
"Just because someone makes a mistake, doesnt mean someone else should make it worse if they can do something about it."
Caravaner made a mistake (or, more likely, was taking the piss and queue jumping). They could have resolved the whole thing by not driving directly into the vehicle which was quite legally and correctly proceeding next to them
trackdemon said:
saaby93 said:
trackdemon said:
If you've missed your turn off, or are just trying to jump the queue and barge in you don't just move into a lane that already has traffic there - especially so if it's a HGV. The truck could have conceded the space, but why should he? It wasn't him making the mistake.
Just because someone makes a mistake, doesnt mean someone else should make it worse if they can do something about it.Highway code states the obvious when it says everyone has a duty to avoid an incident if they can.
It was as clear as night follows day that the caravan needed to move into lane- the truck could easily have slowed up with losing more than a second or so.
Instead what - how many people held up for how many hours in total - how much in insurance
Just ease up, make way if necessary, dont make a situation worse and try some ogmios
And yes we've done it to dust a number of years ago and there are still people preferring to take the collision as a solution
"It was as clear as night follows day that the caravan needed to move into lane"
Indeed it was. Just as it was equally clear they were taking the piss, or could have taken the extraordinarily easy option of rectifying their own mistake by carrying on to the next junction
"Just because someone makes a mistake, doesnt mean someone else should make it worse if they can do something about it."
Caravaner made a mistake (or, more likely, was taking the piss and queue jumping). They could have resolved the whole thing by not driving directly into the vehicle which was quite legally and correctly proceeding next to them
The Highway Code says nothing about trying to teach someone a lesson, otherwise we'd all be driving about in dented jalopies
HC does say Duty to avoid
How many parties there failed to use their duty to avoid
trackdemon said:
Caravaner made a mistake (or, more likely, was taking the piss and queue jumping). They could have resolved the whole thing by not driving directly into the vehicle which was quite legally and correctly proceeding next to them
Also after the 0:20 mark the line goes solid, so from that point it was simply outright illegal for them to move across, no matter what anybody else was doing.Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff