RE: McMurtry Spéirling takes FOS Hillclimb record

RE: McMurtry Spéirling takes FOS Hillclimb record

Author
Discussion

Mr-B

3,790 posts

195 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
georgefreeman918 said:
For exactly the same reasons, I wasn't in awe at the AMG Project One. It made virtually no noise and was rather dissapointing, however I am sure absolutely mega fast and a riot to drive!
AMG sounded awful, worse than current F1 and that is saying something.

Motormatt

485 posts

219 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
I saw this going up the hill and it was mightily impressive. Looks absolutely tiny, especially when compared to some of the modern race cars.

In no way diminishing what McMurty have achieved, but as I watched this along with the Ford Supervan EV and the Cayman Gt4 EV absolutely fly up the hill making some very quick ICE cars look a little pedestrian, it did strike me that EV's are particularly well suited to hill climbs as a demonstration of their ability.

All the things they're good at, ballistic standing starts, instant throttle response, colossal torque everywhere and no gears to worry about give them an obvious advantage on a single attempt at a short course without any concern over range or (relative) lack of top speed that a multi lap format on a full size race track would expose.

CanAm

9,284 posts

273 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
jimmytheone said:
CanAm said:
A bit claustrophobic for my taste. I wonder if they’ll build me a spyder?

Significant A pillars too - obv didnt hamper Max....
Not much of a problem up the hill, but not so good on a busy racetrack or in traffic. See Chaparral 2H

jason61c

5,978 posts

175 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
ducnick said:
Welshbeef said:
That Group C Jag though - remarkable speed, I winder if we will ever see a Sauber C9/11 Merc trying it’s chances up the hill.
{Imagine group C class only racing up the hill … what an experience that would be}.
Whilst undeniably impressive (and my favourite class of racing), a group C car isn’t an ideal hill climber. Look at the exit speed of the cars, the big jag was only just getting going. At the finish line it was starting to gather serious pace crossing the line at 146.2 mph. That’s a fair bit faster than the other IC cars. Even the mini bat mobile is limited to 150mph.
The fan car is seriously impressive and I do wonder if it it could go much faster if the human was removed, thus reducing drag and weight, while also allowing the RC operator to take more risks. Get one of the top RC drivers in a helicopter and let’s see what they could do with it, freed from g force limits of the human body and our inbuilt self preservation instinct, I bet they could shave a few seconds off that time still.
I think there's quite a bit more time left in that. If you look at the vids he wasn't using all the track and all the possible speed everywhere. There seems to have been a safety factor built in to the run..

Look at what justin Law does in the group C cars, where he's not leaving any margin.

Actually I think Justin Law could would have gone quicker in the McMurtry as hes got more experience of doing that actual run.

CanAm

9,284 posts

273 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
It will absolutely loose downforce as road speed climbs because the required mass flow of the suction fan will increase at least linearly with speed, thanks to the swept area of a porous tarmac (and probably far more steeply due to sealing issues). It's why its got massive traction off the line because at zero speed the fan has time to suck most of the air out the gap under the car, but as it starts moving more and more air arrives into that gap in any given unit of time, so suction must reduce.
The team are claiming slightly higher downforce at speed. (overbody aero?)

Zumbruk

7,848 posts

261 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
otolith said:
Yep - they are going to sell them, but it looks as if they are after a wider business model than that.

https://mcmurtry.com/about-us/
That's what I just said.

redroadster

1,756 posts

233 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
In 2000 there were fatalities when a Lotus 63 driven by John Dawson-Damer crashed into the finishing line and on into the trees killing the driver and marshal Andrew Carpenter.
Look At TT Every Year Folk Wiped Out All Time There's No Call To end it.

Zumbruk

7,848 posts

261 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
redroadster said:
FourWheelDrift said:
In 2000 there were fatalities when a Lotus 63 driven by John Dawson-Damer crashed into the finishing line and on into the trees killing the driver and marshal Andrew Carpenter.
Look At TT Every Year Folk Wiped Out All Time There's No Call To end it.
Competitors != Marshals != Spectators.

WCZ

10,548 posts

195 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Hothouse said:
Saw it do several runs over weekend and it was otherworldly.
I felt we were all watching a moment in history. A step change in automotive technology, particularly since their ethos is small and light while everyone else is going bigger and bigger.
Perhaps McMurtry is the new Chapman
this.

this is the first EV car that i'd actually buy (or a watered down version) it's small, has british engineering and looks so much fun!

Twisted Navigator

2 posts

23 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
All of the runs were incredible (got some great shots of it hammering around Molecombe) and I was chatting to the guys in the paddock.
It's limited to 150mph and it was at that for 4 full seconds on the main straight
The version that took the hill had the full race battery pack as opposed to the ID R which was using a cut down one with less than 5 miles of range. If they used a custom battery they'd save 150kg and would shave 4 seconds off the hill time. 34-36 seconds was the time quoted to me.

It weirdly looks a bit slower on the video than it does when it's going past you and bending the laws of physics

WCZ

10,548 posts

195 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Amazing achievement by a small team to take the hill record and an astonishingly different and interesting car!

But, it's clear its operating nowhere near its claimed performance:
no one is really bothered by that though, look at how people cheered it when it went past, it's the car of the weekend that everyone is talking about and rightly so imo

if anything to me it shows there is some glimmer of hope for a fun EV car in the future that i'd actually buy

mekondelta

683 posts

261 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
That Subaru driver has the look of absolute life-threatening commitment! https://youtu.be/mpxP2FEM3HY?t=2149

ringerz

139 posts

227 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Sandpit Steve said:
That was good fun to watch, a tiny little thing that we could tell was really quick just by looking at it.

Shame they didn’t let George Russell and the 2019 Mercedes into the shootout though. It might have been close between them.

(I know the reasons they banned contemporary F1 cars from timed runs, but they’re now allowing cars that are just as fast).
I don't think Goodwood banned them, I believe the timed runs for modern F1 stopped due to the next regs on testing that came into force and that a timed run constitutes a test.

I think even the year after 2000, Mcnish is the Toyota F1 posted comparable unofficial timed run tho Heidfeld's. (My memory could be off though...)

delta0

2,357 posts

107 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
blearyeyedboy said:
Will that limit the use of fans, then? That rather torpedoes this car's ambitions as a road vehicle, such would be a shame.
If they can’t control the noise (that car is pretty loud). I wonder how practical this system is on the road.

esotericar

745 posts

28 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
delta0 said:
blearyeyedboy said:
Will that limit the use of fans, then? That rather torpedoes this car's ambitions as a road vehicle, such would be a shame.
If they can’t control the noise (that car is pretty loud). I wonder how practical this system is on the road.
Why on earth would you want a fan car for the road? I mean, when you're in your neutral-aero fully laterally loaded road car cornering at 120mph through a quick A road sweeper, are you thinking, if only I had two tonnes of downforce so that I could be taking this at 150mph? Or when you're doing 50mph through a tight, blind B-road bend with no margin for braking should something unexpected appear, is it that what you really want is to be doing 80mph?

fruitoftheloon

77 posts

35 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Cool!

S600BSB

4,809 posts

107 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Astonishing achievement!

blearyeyedboy

6,325 posts

180 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
esotericar said:
Why on earth would you want a fan car for the road? I mean, when you're in your neutral-aero fully laterally loaded road car cornering at 120mph through a quick A road sweeper, are you thinking, if only I had two tonnes of downforce so that I could be taking this at 150mph? Or when you're doing 50mph through a tight, blind B-road bend with no margin for braking should something unexpected appear, is it that what you really want is to be doing 80mph?
That's precisely my point.
This is marvellous to see at Goodwood but I struggle to see how it could apply to road use. I'm not sure I like the idea of road users without Max Chilton's talent suddenly losing downforce on the Cat and Fiddle either...

Unless you have a "fan off" more for road use and "fan on" fit the track? I'd struggle to see how that'd work in practice though.

I don't want to moan about an amazing achievement but this strikes me as challenging to make work for road use.

The Wookie

13,973 posts

229 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
blearyeyedboy said:
That's precisely my point.
This is marvellous to see at Goodwood but I struggle to see how it could apply to road use. I'm not sure I like the idea of road users without Max Chilton's talent suddenly losing downforce on the Cat and Fiddle either...

Unless you have a "fan off" more for road use and "fan on" fit the track? I'd struggle to see how that'd work in practice though.

I don't want to moan about an amazing achievement but this strikes me as challenging to make work for road use.
Also while I'd very much enjoy a go in one on track, I suspect for all the other track users it would be like getting overtaken by a 150mph gritting lorry every 5 minutes!

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Zumbruk said:
otolith said:
Max_Torque said:
I imagine they can sell a couple to rich people as a new "toy" but really this has no commercial validity. DF for the road is un-usable and dangerous, and a single seat car is simply not what consumers want because it just doesn't fit with peoples lifestyles
Not sure that they are planning to punt them out on PCP to couples + 2.4 kids though? Stuff like this - the new Gordon Murray creation, the Valkyrie, the Evija, even stuff that sells in the thousands like the aggregate sales of McLaren or Ferrari - it's all irrelevant. What's relevant to consumers and the industry is utterly boring family crossovers.
Troo dat, but these things aren't designed to sell as profitable cars, 'per se', they're designed as engineering showpieces to say "Look what we can do".
the problem for me is that "Look what we can do" is pretty irrelevant to both road cars and race cars? This car is really a parts bin special. They have simply bought really nice parts (motor's, cells, inverters etc) and nailed them together, with no regularitory, cost or production limitations. You can't race one of these (they don't fit any race series regulations currently) it would be a truely horrible road car, and they haven't really developed any particularly tech or methodology that can be applied to other cars.

It is an amazing achievement for a small team and a fantastic "look at us" car, but it's largely pointless in the grand scheme of things (see Capara T1 for ref...)