RE: McMurtry Spéirling takes FOS Hillclimb record

RE: McMurtry Spéirling takes FOS Hillclimb record

Author
Discussion

Olivera

7,140 posts

239 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
Hmm, not so sure to be honest as the Speirling has more power, its possibly a little heavier at a ton I heard, where a current F1 car is a minimum of 798 kilos, in reality probably bit heavier
The Speirling has less power, they've quoted 1000 bhp/tonne and it weighing less than 1000kg, so it makes less than 1000bhp. A 2022 F1 car makes 1000-1050bhp and is also lighter than Speirling.

otolith

56,130 posts

204 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Head to head against the old record

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-Q7a0hfp-A

KarlMac

4,480 posts

141 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
foxbody-87 said:
WCZ said:
That’s the one. That spec sheet says 1100hp though, but the stick on letters said 3000. It’s also worth £1.75 million though according to that.
I think the owner may have received a blow to the head. What do NHRA funny cars make running on meth? Aren’t they about 2500-ish bhp?

foxbody-87

2,675 posts

166 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
They banned ‘current’ F1 cars for safety reasons but looking at the time set this weekend I’m not sure if that was more political than anything. Also a few people have mentioned the Gould hill climb cars, I don’t know a lot about them though.

Equus

16,884 posts

101 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Olivera said:
A 2022 F1 car makes 1000-1050bhp and is also lighter than Speirling.
...but has an engine with a very narrow powerband and gearing suited to circuit racing. Whichever way it falls, there wouldn't be much between them.

And a 2022 F1 car is an F1 car: let's not forget that the Speirling is a road legal trackday car, and a prototype at that: knocked out by a handful of (very clever and quite well-funded) men in a shed.

Obviously it's pitched much higher in the market, but if I were Caterham, having made a recent commitment to launch my own EV, I'd be paying very close attention indeed.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
otolith said:
To be fair, this was once a site for TVR fanciers wink

No doubt at all that the i3 is a better car, in the same sense that my E class is a better car than my Elise, but you wouldn't buy an i3 as a toy.
yup your right, i'd buy a Caterham, as i'd just about be able to manage to get most of the performance out of one of those and still enjoy myself ;-)

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Incidentally for me, this is the car of the show:



Because rather than design the ultimate car and not quite manage to go as fast as it perhaps should, he has taken a completely unsuitable car and made it far far faster than should be expected:

https://youtu.be/mpxP2FEM3HY?t=2109

7 seconds slower than the electric missile, 500% more entertaining !!!
That's just a high power Impreza in an old frock. Great fun of course but nothing bleeding edge about it.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
the problem for me is that "Look what we can do" is pretty irrelevant to both road cars and race cars? This car is really a parts bin special. They have simply bought really nice parts (motor's, cells, inverters etc) and nailed them together, with no regularitory, cost or production limitations. You can't race one of these (they don't fit any race series regulations currently) it would be a truely horrible road car, and they haven't really developed any particularly tech or methodology that can be applied to other cars.

It is an amazing achievement for a small team and a fantastic "look at us" car, but it's largely pointless in the grand scheme of things (see Capara T1 for ref...)
Lots of things we do are utterly pointless. The space race was pointless, if you want to analyse what putting a man on the moon did, and was pretty much soon a nothing event as people got bored or it after a few landings and switched off the TV.

But it brought new technology we now take for granted to our lives, just as wars often do. It's the innovation process that drives us all forward longer term, that's what is exciting about daft projects like this. It's doubling exciting because its a bunch of Brits doing it and not some freak like Musk.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
KarlMac said:
Surprised no one’s commented on the fact the McMurtry managed to break the record yet the official gen 3 Formula E car failed to make up the hill all weekend? I guess they were taking it serious putting Heidfeld in the seat.

Not a great advert for the sport.
Formula E is dead man walking. As F1 heads down the hybrid route and synthetic fuels more by every iteration, it's become more irrelevant. Manufacturers are leaving.

BobToc

1,773 posts

117 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
I really appreciated the Jag and the March in the top 10. I’ve no idea how much they’re worth, but its great seeing them give it some in the old toys.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Equus said:
Such is Gordon Murray's talent for self-promotion that you might be fooled into thinking that he came up with the fan car.

He did not. He came up with a way of justifying it to the scrutineers (by claiming, with some very dodgy maths, that its primary purpose was cooling).

As your linked article mentions almost as an afterthought, this was the first fan car, built 8 years before the BT46B:



Edited by Equus on Monday 27th June 16:31
There was nothing dodgy about his maths.

Formula 1 is just a set of rules you have to comply to, it's formula, the Brabham met the rules as they were written and Murray proved his maths was correct when the FIA inspected the car and measured the relative pressure throughout the cars airflow.

As mentioned, Jim Hall did it earlier, but that was pretty st, using a very unreliable and heavy snowmobile engine to drive the fans. What Murray did was infinitely more efficient and reliable.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
big_rob_sydney said:
Who knows, maybe one day we'll have flying cars that are battery powered.

Wouldn't that be something...
They already exist in prototype form. The challenge there is how they all interact so you don't have a pile up in the sky. You wont be driving them.

Skylinecrazy

13,986 posts

194 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Still think Alex Summers would be on pace if he took the firestorm up the hill.

Alex unfortunately is now going to be overlooked. Faster than max after one run.

Skylinecrazy

13,986 posts

194 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
foxbody-87 said:
They banned ‘current’ F1 cars for safety reasons but looking at the time set this weekend I’m not sure if that was more political than anything. Also a few people have mentioned the Gould hill climb cars, I don’t know a lot about them though.
Faster than F1 cars to 150 and designed for hills.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Doesn't look at all "fun" to me tbh. It looks bloodyhard work and looks like it will kill you at a drop of a hat!

I'd happily take my i3 over the Spurting for any road drive!! :-)
I used to drive a cosworth turbo powered westfield to the 'ring, thrash it for 2 days, then drive home. 600 mile trip each way. It was hilarious. I would love something like this little car to get a similar experience without eating soot for hours, which is what you do in a 7 due to the poor aero.

TDK-C60

2,334 posts

30 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Equus said:
In fairness, if you look at the amount of st that the McMurty was kicking up behind itself, you really wouldn't want to run behind one on any sort of circuit racing.
The footage was impressive and looked almost sped up - but I was also struck by how much stuff was coming out of the back. It had a sort of permanent cloud of hoovered up road behind it. Surely that would not be remotely tolerable on the road!

It must be quite a thing to drive. How does the downforce compare to the T50? Has that been caught on video with a "cloud"?

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
TDK-C60 said:
The footage was impressive and looked almost sped up - but I was also struck by how much stuff was coming out of the back. It had a sort of permanent cloud of hoovered up road behind it. Surely that would not be remotely tolerable on the road!

It must be quite a thing to drive. How does the downforce compare to the T50? Has that been caught on video with a "cloud"?
Stick a bag on the back. biggrin

T50 doesn't generate downforce in the same way from the fans, in that car the fan is used to assist airflow to stay attached to the high angle diffuser, which is generating the downforce. It's not a sealed floor system, no st goes through it.

ajprice

27,481 posts

196 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
jsf said:
Stick a bag on the back. biggrin

T50 doesn't generate downforce in the same way from the fans, in that car the fan is used to assist airflow to stay attached to the high angle diffuser, which is generating the downforce. It's not a sealed floor system, no st goes through it.
T.50 has a filter in it so stop anything that does get through.

unpc

2,835 posts

213 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
Pebbles167 said:
ruairi50 said:
Its a SNOREFEST at this stage when 5 of the top 10 cars are Glorified Milk Floats. EVs should have their own

Hillclimb. PISS BORING
Boring reply. Heard that one before.
Indeed. I was there. It was very far from boring. I'd go one step further and say the EVs sounded different from one another and some sounded quite Interesting. I'm a lifelong petrolhead too.

J4CKO

41,560 posts

200 months

Monday 27th June 2022
quotequote all
kambites said:
J4CKO said:
The Speirling has 4wd...
The above says RWD?
Ah ok, sure I read it was 4wd, but does look like its rwd.

Might have been me assuming based on a 14 sec 0-60 but if its glued to the floor I guess traction isnt a problem.