RE: Final EU vote on 2035 engine phaseout delayed
Discussion
Strangely Brown said:
I suspect that as time rolls on, and we get closer and closer to the cutoff, there will be more and more pressure to reverse some of these ludicrous plans.
Prof Richard Lindzen talks about his work on IPCC and his concern for the mistaken narrative of Climate Alarmism and the way it will lead to the suffering of many.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXGWeO0KXlU
Nothing to do with EVsProf Richard Lindzen talks about his work on IPCC and his concern for the mistaken narrative of Climate Alarmism and the way it will lead to the suffering of many.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXGWeO0KXlU
911hope said:
Strangely Brown said:
D4rez said:
Nothing to do with EVs
Really? Maybe you should watch it and think again.Pepperpots said:
It may well be the majority view too but it appears to me that the consensus has been been bought.
There may be a consensus but it is not what the public is told to believe. Science has been replaced by "The Science (TM)" and if you want funding you will stay line. Yes, it has been bought.Strangely Brown said:
Pepperpots said:
It may well be the majority view too but it appears to me that the consensus has been been bought.
There may be a consensus but it is not what the public is told to believe. Science has been replaced by "The Science (TM)" and if you want funding you will stay line. Yes, it has been bought.Gosh!
dvs_dave said:
Strangely Brown said:
"The Science (TM)"
Public service announcement"The Science (TM)" is the latest conspiracy theorists phrase de jour. Put it in the same bucket as the likes of “sheeple”, “do your own research”, “global elites”, “WEF”, “Fauchiism,” etc.
Strangely Brown said:
dvs_dave said:
Strangely Brown said:
"The Science (TM)"
Public service announcement"The Science (TM)" is the latest conspiracy theorists phrase de jour. Put it in the same bucket as the likes of “sheeple”, “do your own research”, “global elites”, “WEF”, “Fauchiism,” etc.
The thread is full of no-numbers b
ks. Give us the empirical truth. SpeckledJim said:
Turn out the facts then. With the numbers. And then we can think about it.
The thread is full of no-numbers bks. Give us the empirical truth.
The facts and the numbers are available for all to read in the IPCC report(s) and the data behind them. You could waste your time reading them or you could listen to the people that actually worked on them, not the politicians that produced the summaries, the people who authored the reports.The thread is full of no-numbers b
ks. Give us the empirical truth. They don't say what you are told they say.
Anyway, it's all academic because the policy makers are already committed to the narrative and we are all going to be the poorer for it.
Strangely Brown said:
SpeckledJim said:
Turn out the facts then. With the numbers. And then we can think about it.
The thread is full of no-numbers bks. Give us the empirical truth.
The facts and the numbers are available for all to read in the IPCC report(s) and the data behind them. You could waste your time reading them or you could listen to the people that actually worked on them, not the politicians that produced the summaries, the people who authored the reports.The thread is full of no-numbers b
ks. Give us the empirical truth. They don't say what you are told they say.
Anyway, it's all academic because the policy makers are already committed to the narrative and we are all going to be the poorer for it.
Strangely Brown said:
And if you actually listen to what he says you'd see that it is not the minority view. The "consensus" is another piece of twisted information fed to the public by politicians and activists.
Another one! You guys are amusing - you try really hard to extol the virtues of rubbish.
His view in the Scientific community is most definitely a minority one - his comments and papers have been peer reviewed and debunked: he is sponsored by Peabody to promote his views! A Scientist for Hire!
He is a Conspiracy Theorists darling.
PastelNata said:
Another one! You guys are amusing - you try really hard to extol the virtues of rubbish.
His view in the Scientific community is most definitely a minority one - his comments and papers have been peer reviewed and debunked: he is sponsored by Peabody to promote his views! A Scientist for Hire!
He is a Conspiracy Theorists darling.
As I said earlier: the more this goes on the more people will begin to realise that we (in the west) are the ones making ourselves poorer while China, India and the rest laugh at us.
Strangely Brown said:
911hope said:
What is your research, thinking?
What expertise did you apply, when choosing the opposite view to the vast majority of the relevant scientific community?
It's not the vast majority of the relevant scientific community. That is just part of the narrative.What expertise did you apply, when choosing the opposite view to the vast majority of the relevant scientific community?
What is your thinking? What expertise did you apply while adopting your views.
Please be specific, otherwise you will never communicate your view effectively.
Edited by 911hope on Monday 3rd April 21:32
911hope said:
That's just a line that you have swallowed.
What is your thinking? What expertise did you apply while adopting your views.
Please be specific, otherwise you cannot be taken seriously.
There are well respected climate scientists who actually worked on the IPCC reports and have given plenty of details and reasoning but you [the royal you] dismiss them as shills, crackpots and conspiracy theorists so why the hell are you going to listen to me. You can choose to listen to people who know what they are talking about and actually wrote the bloody reports or you can listen to government "experts" through the media and hysterical activists.What is your thinking? What expertise did you apply while adopting your views.
Please be specific, otherwise you cannot be taken seriously.
You make your choice. I'll make mine.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff