RE: Final EU vote on 2035 engine phaseout delayed

RE: Final EU vote on 2035 engine phaseout delayed

Author
Discussion

otolith

56,259 posts

205 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
I want to see this ICE drivetrain which consists only of a fuel tank and doesn’t require several hundred kilograms of engine and gearbox in order to function.

GT9

6,710 posts

173 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
otolith said:
I want to see this ICE drivetrain which consists only of a fuel tank and doesn’t require several hundred kilograms of engine and gearbox in order to function.
Personally I'm more concerned that a poster with that particular username may have at some point been near the controls of an aeroplane.

bigothunter

11,328 posts

61 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
otolith said:
I want to see this ICE drivetrain which consists only of a fuel tank and doesn’t require several hundred kilograms of engine and gearbox in order to function.


TheBinarySheep

1,133 posts

52 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
otolith said:
I want to see this ICE drivetrain which consists only of a fuel tank and doesn’t require several hundred kilograms of engine and gearbox in order to function.
And is apparently 100% efficient

500TORQUES

4,645 posts

16 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
bigothunter said:
500TORQUES said:
911hope said:
Do they mention the fuel they burn moving the whole circus around the globe every couple of weeks and how irrelevant the car fuel and efficiency is?
That is already carbon neutral.
How? scratchchin
I thought i read the transport was fully offset, but can't find the info now.

F1 have reduced the travel impact with some current measures such as running the broadcast from a fixed location for all races now, rather than transport the studio and staff to site. They have also implemented smaller travelling staff numbers for the teams.

The fuel used from 2026 will be carbon neutral, it's recently moved to a 10% biofuel prior to the big change in 2026, and there is a commitment for the whole circus to be carbon neutral by 2030.

F1 is one of the major innovative environments that is going to help the move to sustainability faster, it's quite an exciting environment to see engineering making leaps forward which will be useful, something we haven't really been able to say for a while.

The chase to EV only is clearly a mistake, you are seeing alternatives finding a voice as that realisation takes hold. This will especially be the case for transportation of goods.

bigothunter

11,328 posts

61 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
500TORQUES said:
I thought i read the transport was fully offset, but can't find the info now.

F1 have reduced the travel impact with some current measures such as running the broadcast from a fixed location for all races now, rather than transport the studio and staff to site. They have also implemented smaller travelling staff numbers for the teams.

The fuel used from 2026 will be carbon neutral, it's recently moved to a 10% biofuel prior to the big change in 2026, and there is a commitment for the whole circus to be carbon neutral by 2030.

F1 is one of the major innovative environments that is going to help the move to sustainability faster, it's quite an exciting environment to see engineering making leaps forward which will be useful, something we haven't really been able to say for a while.

The chase to EV only is clearly a mistake, you are seeing alternatives finding a voice as that realisation takes hold. This will especially be the case for transportation of goods.
Thanks thumbup

SpeckledJim

31,608 posts

254 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
SpeckledJim said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
Sorry, but trying to convince people, that the energy needed to move the 70 pound weight of the fuel tank (including the weight of the tank itself, and which reduces in weight as the fuel in the tank is consumed) in a medium sized ICE vehicle, is going to be anywhere near the energy required to move the weight of a 1200 pound EV battery (which stays the same weight, whether or not it is full or empty) is just clutching at straws.
EVs may have regen, but the energy used in accelerating the weight of a 1200 pound battery, up to the required speed, is always going to be greater than the energy consumed in accelerating an equivalent ICE vehicle with a 70 pound fuel tank, up to the same speed.
So when you read reports about EVs that say things like ‘it does the equivalent of 150mpg’ what do you think that means?

Because you’re saying the opposite.

It means nothing, when proponents of EVs desperately try to kid people, that it takes less energy to move a 1200 pound EV battery (which weighs the same when it is empty, as when it is full) than it takes to move a full 70 pound ICE fuel tank (which reduces in weight as the fuel in the tank is consumed)
Add to this that electricity has one of the worst Government fuel factors (Cradle to grave emissions) of any of the fuels available in the UK, where only 43% is produced by renewables, and the rest by fossil fuels and some nuclear.
So when they say ‘equivalent to 150mpg’ it is a flat-out lie! Surely someone has been prosecuted for this kind of deceptive statement?

You’re actually claiming an ICE is more efficient than an EV!?

Does it strike you as odd that at even the most strident of the anti-EV crowd aren’t here backing you up?

What percentage chance would you assign to the possibility that you’ve got this one wrong?
Here we are, PPP: MG Motor telling blatant lies on their website.

https://news.mgmotor.eu/what-is-the-equivalent-fue...

Clearly this is a shady and deceptive practice, as you have blown the whistle and told us all the truth. Are you going to report them to the ASA or shall I?

DonkeyApple

55,478 posts

170 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
500TORQUES said:
I thought i read the transport was fully offset, but can't find the info now.

F1 have reduced the travel impact with some current measures such as running the broadcast from a fixed location for all races now, rather than transport the studio and staff to site. They have also implemented smaller travelling staff numbers for the teams.

The fuel used from 2026 will be carbon neutral, it's recently moved to a 10% biofuel prior to the big change in 2026, and there is a commitment for the whole circus to be carbon neutral by 2030.

F1 is one of the major innovative environments that is going to help the move to sustainability faster, it's quite an exciting environment to see engineering making leaps forward which will be useful, something we haven't really been able to say for a while.

The chase to EV only is clearly a mistake, you are seeing alternatives finding a voice as that realisation takes hold. This will especially be the case for transportation of goods.
The trouble is that there is no innovation involved in Liberty engaging Goldmans to calculate how many carbon credits to purchase on the open market to offset a fraction of the CO2 and general pollution a wholly unnecessary enterprise creates. biggrin

I don't envy F1 these days as there is nothing they can do to truly fix the reality that they won't even be able to argue their waste is offset by trickle down to the road ICe market in a decade's time.

ICE Motorsport is only going to come under greater and greater assault from more and more corners as people seek to kill it off for good as they hate it, what it stands for and the sort of people who enjoy it.

Very sad.

bigothunter

11,328 posts

61 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
The trouble is that there is no innovation involved in Liberty engaging Goldmans to calculate how many carbon credits to purchase on the open market to offset a fraction of the CO2 and general pollution a wholly unnecessary enterprise creates. biggrin

I don't envy F1 these days as there is nothing they can do to truly fix the reality that they won't even be able to argue their waste is offset by trickle down to the road ICe market in a decade's time.

ICE Motorsport is only going to come under greater and greater assault from more and more corners as people seek to kill it off for good as they hate it, what it stands for and the sort of people who enjoy it.

Very sad.
To survive long term, Formula 1 needs to go fully electric. Fundamentally an upgraded Formula E.

ICE motorsport will become the domain of historic vehicles.


Pepperpots

371 posts

166 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
I hope it doesn't go full electric, worst thing it could do.

500TORQUES

4,645 posts

16 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
The trouble is that there is no innovation involved in Liberty engaging Goldmans to calculate how many carbon credits to purchase on the open market to offset a fraction of the CO2 and general pollution a wholly unnecessary enterprise creates. biggrin

I don't envy F1 these days as there is nothing they can do to truly fix the reality that they won't even be able to argue their waste is offset by trickle down to the road ICe market in a decade's time.

ICE Motorsport is only going to come under greater and greater assault from more and more corners as people seek to kill it off for good as they hate it, what it stands for and the sort of people who enjoy it.

Very sad.
You are such a miserable sod.

F1 engineering on the powertrain side has never been so interesting or relevant to the way the future is heading.

500TORQUES

4,645 posts

16 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
Pepperpots said:
I hope it doesn't go full electric, worst thing it could do.
It's going to 40% electric 60% ICE in 2026.

F1 will always have a large % ICE component.

FE is garbage, it's a dead man walking series.

F1 and WEC is the most likely to be sustainable, the new hypercar WEC had it's first race just this week, with some manufacturers coming back to that area of racing for the first time in decsdes.

Soupdragon65

63 posts

14 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
500TORQUES said:
DonkeyApple said:
The trouble is that there is no innovation involved in Liberty engaging Goldmans to calculate how many carbon credits to purchase on the open market to offset a fraction of the CO2 and general pollution a wholly unnecessary enterprise creates. biggrin

I don't envy F1 these days as there is nothing they can do to truly fix the reality that they won't even be able to argue their waste is offset by trickle down to the road ICe market in a decade's time.

ICE Motorsport is only going to come under greater and greater assault from more and more corners as people seek to kill it off for good as they hate it, what it stands for and the sort of people who enjoy it.

Very sad.
You are such a miserable sod.

F1 engineering on the powertrain side has never been so interesting or relevant to the way the future is heading.
But the future is full BEV by 2035 so it will have lost all relevance to cars that people drive.

It would be better for it to go full ICE in VR to maintain the experience while being socially acceptable. Max Verstappen is pretty handy in sim racing remember, it’s not that much of a stretch


Most people watch F1 on TV so what’s the difference?

911hope

2,714 posts

27 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
Pan Pan Pan said:

It means nothing, when proponents of EVs desperately try to kid people, that it takes less energy to move a 1200 pound EV battery (which weighs the same when it is empty, as when it is full) than it takes to move a full 70 pound ICE fuel tank (which reduces in weight as the fuel in the tank is consumed)
Add to this that electricity has one of the worst Government fuel factors (Cradle to grave emissions) of any of the fuels available in the UK, where only 43% is produced by renewables, and the rest by fossil fuels and some nuclear.
No-one is moving the fuel store on its own....

So please make rational comparisons...such as...

energy to move a EV, including the battery vs. energy to move ICE car, including the tank( with reducing fuel)

Unless you can dream up a 3 x mass factor (mass EV/Mass ICE car), then your argument is just plain wrong.

These highly selective arguments, where key elements are deliberately left out don't sell your case in the slightest.

In fact you probably don't even believe it yourself.




Edited by 911hope on Sunday 19th March 15:41

Pepperpots

371 posts

166 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
500TORQUES said:
Pepperpots said:
I hope it doesn't go full electric, worst thing it could do.
It's going to 40% electric 60% ICE in 2026.

F1 will always have a large % ICE component.

FE is garbage, it's a dead man walking series.

F1 and WEC is the most likely to be sustainable, the new hypercar WEC had it's first race just this week, with some manufacturers coming back to that area of racing for the first time in decades.
This is absolutely what I am hoping, you can't race without an ICE, it just doesn't 'work'.

911hope

2,714 posts

27 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
bigothunter said:
DonkeyApple said:
The trouble is that there is no innovation involved in Liberty engaging Goldmans to calculate how many carbon credits to purchase on the open market to offset a fraction of the CO2 and general pollution a wholly unnecessary enterprise creates. biggrin

I don't envy F1 these days as there is nothing they can do to truly fix the reality that they won't even be able to argue their waste is offset by trickle down to the road ICe market in a decade's time.

ICE Motorsport is only going to come under greater and greater assault from more and more corners as people seek to kill it off for good as they hate it, what it stands for and the sort of people who enjoy it.

Very sad.
To survive long term, Formula 1 needs to go fully electric. Fundamentally an upgraded Formula E.

ICE motorsport will become the domain of historic vehicles.
The fuel used is a miniscule proportion of the problem.
Changing it is simply greenwashing.

Strangely Brown

10,089 posts

232 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
None of this argument about engine efficiency and stuff makes any difference to me. Nor does any arguments about how the electricity is generated or supplied to the chargers, even if they can be made reasonably ubiquitous.

The elephant in the room and the main reason that I have zero interest in an electric car, even if it were the same price as the ICE equivalent, is charge time. If it means that I have to wait inordinate amounts of time to buy another 100 miles or so of range then it's a non-starter. It is not even a consideration.

You can only get the electrons from the grid into the battery so fast and, as it stands, that is not good enough.

500TORQUES

4,645 posts

16 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
911hope said:
The fuel used is a miniscule proportion of the problem.
Changing it is simply greenwashing.
Shut down every spectator profesional sport. They all require energy consumption.

Some people have lost their mind, humans will always consume energy enjoying entertainment that are not essential to simply surviving.

If you want to simply exist, you have that choice, most people want and need more out of life than that.

havoc

30,112 posts

236 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
Stuff about wealth
Sorry DA, but a lot of that is wrong-headed.

1) I wasn't comparing to 20 years ago. I was comparing to 40 / 60 / 80 / 100 years ago. When the wealth distribution curve was substantially LESS unequal than it is now.

2) To address your key point - the standard of living of the majority of the population of the UK has FALLEN since 2007, and life expectancies for the majority of the population are now starting to follow suit.

3) The whole 'bigger cake' argument is fallacious, as it assumes that growth is always possible (It's emphatically not, as we are now seeing with both global warming and substantial extinctions), and is used as a veil for the exploitative classes to hide behind.


Summary: Since 2007 life for most people has got noticeably harder, while the wealth divide has increased substantially. And you don't think that's a problem?!?

Edited by havoc on Sunday 19th March 17:34

911hope

2,714 posts

27 months

Sunday 19th March 2023
quotequote all
bigothunter said:
500TORQUES said:
911hope said:
Do they mention the fuel they burn moving the whole circus around the globe every couple of weeks and how irrelevant the car fuel and efficiency is?
That is already carbon neutral.
How? scratchchin
The operations certainly are NOT carbon neutral.

Actually F1 has a vague plan to be neutral by 2030.

If anyone doesn't believe me, read their own presentation. (link below)
In it you will find that the proportion used by the cars is 0.7%

You will also find that their estimated emissions (just statements without underlying facts, so who knows if it relates to reality) conveniently omits the impact of 100's of thousands of spectator journeys.

https://corp.formula1.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/...