2 stroke engines for the public - should we ban them?

2 stroke engines for the public - should we ban them?

Author
Discussion

tamore

Original Poster:

6,986 posts

285 months

Sunday 2nd April 2023
quotequote all
carlo996 said:
Have we banned strimmers yet, I just want to know before firing the Stihl's up for a bit of garden and hedge work. Is that ok OP biggrin
knock yourself out. don't forget to rev them unnecessarily for the whole time wink

carlo996

5,708 posts

22 months

Sunday 2nd April 2023
quotequote all
tamore said:
knock yourself out. don't forget to rev them unnecessarily for the whole time wink
It's how they work chap rofl

tamore

Original Poster:

6,986 posts

285 months

Sunday 2nd April 2023
quotequote all
carlo996 said:
It's how they work chap rofl
2 stroke tourettes

tdm34

7,370 posts

211 months

Sunday 2nd April 2023
quotequote all
Rind a ding ding ding!!!


rigga

8,732 posts

202 months

Sunday 2nd April 2023
quotequote all
2 smoke Sunday today , dragged the bike out AND gave the garden a spruce up with the strimmer.

Let myself down with the 4 stroke mower though.

Pan Pan Pan

9,919 posts

112 months

Monday 3rd April 2023
quotequote all
Skyedriver said:
Taita said:
Lets have less random Govt meddling and 'being seen to do something' please.

aka, fk off out my life as much as possible and focus on improving things that matter instead of tinkering on ste.
+1

If you're intent on banning things, ban foreign holidays and flying to far away places.
Less aviation fuel pollution and folk should spend their money in the UK rather than foreign lands thereby improving the economy.
Every human on the planet is (To a greater or lesser extent) a resource consuming, waste producing, CO2 emitting entity, and we are in the process of adding billions more at NET global rates above one hundred thousand per DAY. Whether some, in some areas, use more, whilst others in other areas use less, is just a red herring, an irrelevance. because those who emit less generally have to endure very poor lifestyles, but who are (in time), doing their level best, to modernize, industrialize, and commercialize, (and who are we to say they should not?) so that they too can attain the lifestyle of those who consume more and emit more. Or do people believe that as a person becomes better off, they stick with the very poor lifestyle they had when they were poorer?
If we want to survive as a species, perhaps we should `ban' people from having too many children? Since population is at the root of so many of the issues facing the planet?

bqf

2,231 posts

172 months

Monday 3rd April 2023
quotequote all
I'd like to see a battery powered brushcutter get through the stuff I hacked down this week.

Strangely enough I bought a Ryobi battery powered chainsaw, which is frankly weaker than mouse piss. It also lasts about an hour if you're lucky.

So, the answer to your preposterous question is 'absolutely not'.