RE: New Tesla Model 3 Performance gets 510hp

RE: New Tesla Model 3 Performance gets 510hp

Author
Discussion

ChocolateFrog

25,495 posts

174 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
Itsallicanafford said:
I’m 3 years into plain Jane Model 3 dual motor ownership as part of my only buy petrol for fun policy (for track days or exhibiting our classic) as I think 30 years of being ripped off by oil companies is quite enough. After nearly 50k miles in the Tesla, I absolutely love it. In appliance white, on 18 inch wheels with plastic hub caps and circa 400bhp, it is, hands down, the greatest sleeper of all time. It is laugh out loud fun. I’m having one of these new performances, in black so you would had to look real hard to see it’s a performance. My only slight regret is they didn’t do something nutty, like give it 800bhp…
That's what the Plaid moniker is for. Along with Carbon Ceramics.

ChocolateFrog

25,495 posts

174 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
howardhughes said:
Howard1650 said:
Is this thread the end for Pistonheads?
Has the love of ICE finally be reduced to a hobby for the old generation?
I've mentioned this many times previously. The rate of EV's making headlines on this site is alarming. In my opinion the site should be split ICE / EV's This way we can choose between the two and not force-fed the tripe of electric cars every time you hit the home page.
Here's a novel idea.

Don't click on what you don't want to read. It's not difficult to guess that an article about a Tesla is going to include lots of chat about EVs.

SuperPav

1,093 posts

126 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
David87 said:
1. See the images below from Tesla’s US and UK websites. Seems cars out of the Shanghai factory have 50hp less than the California ones. Or do they as the 0-60mph times are identical?! The batteries are certainly different and that could impact performance or it might not. YouTube, do your thing.
I suspect this is because Europe has introduced specific regulations to align how to quote EV power output, based on how long the power is sustained for etc so that people don't make up their own ways of measuing/quoting.

This has not been adopted by US, and I'm not aware of any equivalent standards, therefore there may be more "leeway" in what figures you can publish.


If you're REALLY bored, you can have a read of this document on the details of GTR-21....

https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/ECE_...

borat52

564 posts

209 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
Not clear from the article or helped by LHD pictures - is this coming in RHD?

ChocolateFrog

25,495 posts

174 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
cookie1600 said:
Itsallicanafford said:
I think 30 years of being ripped off by oil companies is quite enough.
What, the electricity companies are so benevolent and not ripping anyone off?
Well you can make your own if 7.5p a unit is a bit steep.

GroundEffect

13,844 posts

157 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
SuperPav said:
David87 said:
1. See the images below from Tesla’s US and UK websites. Seems cars out of the Shanghai factory have 50hp less than the California ones. Or do they as the 0-60mph times are identical?! The batteries are certainly different and that could impact performance or it might not. YouTube, do your thing.
I suspect this is because Europe has introduced specific regulations to align how to quote EV power output, based on how long the power is sustained for etc so that people don't make up their own ways of measuing/quoting.

This has not been adopted by US, and I'm not aware of any equivalent standards, therefore there may be more "leeway" in what figures you can publish.


If you're REALLY bored, you can have a read of this document on the details of GTR-21....

https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/ECE_...
Beat me to it.

big_rob_sydney

3,406 posts

195 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
I cant wait till mine arrives. Still keeping the Lexus for now though, and trading the "old" model 3, just in case we have to do huge drives. But I will say though that I went from maybe 12,000 miles a year to about 500 since the EV arrived. I'm starting to get to a point where I think an ICE is really surplus.

Some funny comments in this thread that seem to be anti-EV or whatever. But I was never really an EV lover until I had a go in one, and I would say, try it for a few months, and you might be surprised. Sure, some people will say they tried it and went back to ICE. Fair enough. But there are a lot of people who have gone EV and really love it. As far as a daily driver, none of my subarus came close, heavily modified or standard, and even my lexus is starting to lose its appeal for everything except its ability to do 550 miles in one go.

ChocolateFrog

25,495 posts

174 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
Ken_Code said:
I never used to do enough miles that these made sense, which is why buying my Model S was a poor decision.

Given how cheap used model 3s are though it’s a bit more tempting.
How many miles to you have to do to make spending £90000 on a car make sense?

An airport taxi driver amount of miles if someone was asking me.

Edited by ChocolateFrog on Wednesday 24th April 11:38

Mouse Rat

1,817 posts

93 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
I drove a M3P shortly after they came out and while it was very very quick, I was bored after 10 minutes and felt it was a tacky product.

Earlier this year I had a SR for a week and was impressed, seemed better built, practical, easy to use, quick and achieved around 200 miles range.

While I can't believe they've removed an indicator stork (have Tesla R&D ever used roundabouts) I would consider a SR or LR, but not the performance.

However what impresses me most about the model 3 is how efficient they are.


ZiggyNiva

1,136 posts

187 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
And still the wipers won't work!

CG2020UK

1,530 posts

41 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
Seems a nice improvement over the outgoing Tesla 3 that I think never quite looked modern.

At £60k it seems like a bit of a bargain and bang on M340i money.

Be watching the reviews though personally my pick for me of the bunch if I felt the need for a new performance EV would be a Hyundai Ioniq 5N.

I’d probably save £30-35k but and get the current Model 3 Performance or the newest standard Model 3 which is perfectly adequate.

Rory’s review on Autotrader YouTube channel is pretty good and fair I think.

Edited by CG2020UK on Wednesday 24th April 12:00

ChocolateFrog

25,495 posts

174 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
KingGary said:




It’s a less interesting, inferior version of the Vauxhall Insignia. Boring car for a new generation of boring people to drive.
I assume you commute to work on a Vincent Black Shadow?

ChocolateFrog

25,495 posts

174 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
Worth noting they're $53k in the US before subsidies.

So not only do they earn more, it's significantly cheaper.

I know cars always cost more here but I wonder if the extra margin is because they're not that bothered about the RHD market?

cerb4.5lee

30,738 posts

181 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
Mouse Rat said:
However what impresses me most about the model 3 is how efficient they are.
I think that is the rub really. The model 3 works well for tight gits and boring people to me, because anyone who wants a bit of excitement in their life, wouldn't give a rats ass about efficiency in my opinion.

Fastlane

1,155 posts

218 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
FeelingLucky said:
It normally takes a McLaren article to bring out the hardcore throbbers, but this one has hit the mother load.
I think you are probably talking about yourself...

JAMSXR

1,491 posts

48 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
ChocolateFrog said:
Worth noting they're $53k in the US before subsidies.

So not only do they earn more, it's significantly cheaper.

I know cars always cost more here but I wonder if the extra margin is because they're not that bothered about the RHD market?
I may be wrong but I thought US MSRP doesn’t include taxes and license fees.

WCZ

10,537 posts

195 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
love it, hoping this will be my next company car

value for money seems good still - in contrast to the £50k 330hp S3 at least!

ChocolateFrog

25,495 posts

174 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
JAMSXR said:
ChocolateFrog said:
Worth noting they're $53k in the US before subsidies.

So not only do they earn more, it's significantly cheaper.

I know cars always cost more here but I wonder if the extra margin is because they're not that bothered about the RHD market?
I may be wrong but I thought US MSRP doesn’t include taxes and license fees.
That would make some sense.

Although why would you quote a price without them, would be odd to see car prices quoted ex VAT in the UK.

otolith

56,214 posts

205 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
ChocolateFrog said:
That would make some sense.

Although why would you quote a price without them, would be odd to see car prices quoted ex VAT in the UK.
Probably because in the US taxes and incentives vary state by state.

kalniel

242 posts

121 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
I was really hoping they'd bring back indicator stalks for the performance, or at least split them to opposite side of the wheel.

I had a two hour test drive in the facelifted 3 and it was as frustrating by the end as it was at the start, otherwise was pretty impressed.