RE: SOTW: Clio Williams

RE: SOTW: Clio Williams

Author
Discussion

The_Ox

102 posts

227 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
Dagnut said:
Anyone else think thats a fake? didn't they have a plague above the gear leveler?

you can tell buy the suspension the Williams had independent and the 16v had a torsion bar...i finks..i think the willaims has a wide rear track than that..i could be wrong but it doesn't look right

Edited by Dagnut on Friday 11th July 13:03


Edited by Dagnut on Friday 11th July 13:05
The originals had a plaque but the 2s and 3s didn't afaik.

williamp

19,262 posts

273 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
so, is there an obvious way to check its an original?

Neomagic

Original Poster:

386 posts

201 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
Oli S said:
7.7 was Autocar and EVO timed it at 7.6 smile
Fair enough, shows my lack of knowledge about French motors.

John D.

17,872 posts

209 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
I'd love to have a go in one of these. That is cheap for a weekend toy.

DR B

66 posts

190 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
Lots of little things to check its original. The engine should be stamped as F7R, not F7P (1.8 16v), and it has a wider track than the 1.8 16v. White dot on the dipstick, blue dials, seat belts, carpets, and williams embossed interior. The 2's and 3's have the 2.0 in the bumpstrip along the side instead of in the indicator housing on the wings. I'm sure there are other things, but I can't remember what else!

andymc

7,357 posts

207 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
seen quite a few of these sub £1500, cracking buys

Dagnut

3,515 posts

193 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
DR B said:
Lots of little things to check its original. The engine should be stamped as F7R, not F7P (1.8 16v), and it has a wider track than the 1.8 16v. White dot on the dipstick, blue dials, seat belts, carpets, and williams embossed interior. The 2's and 3's have the 2.0 in the bumpstrip along the side instead of in the indicator housing on the wings. I'm sure there are other things, but I can't remember what else!
originally thats what made me suspicious it looked to narrow at the rear..my mate had a mock up and Park beside the real one you could notice.
That one is probably real but, I was wrong about suspension and plaque



Edited by Dagnut on Friday 11th July 13:27

DR B

66 posts

190 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
Just did a VRM check with the RAC, and it comes back as a Willy 2. That is very cheap. In fact its so cheap I had to mention it on the owners club!

1977amm

18 posts

202 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
It's only 69 miles from me - temptation got the better of me so phoned up about it...now sold.

Probably for the best in my case.

Never driven a Williams but always wanted one...

morgrp

4,128 posts

198 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
williamp said:
so, is there an obvious way to check its an original?
Chassis Number - Your local Renault Stealership will tell you which number the production ran through -

I have driven most fast Renaults and have driven a Williams 2 - My mate worked for Renault! - I still maintain this was and still is one the all time great hot hatches - If you can't stretch to a measely 999quid - Go for a 16valve instead - in my opinion there isn't much in it between the 2 - I was offered a decent SOTW 16valver the other day - Silver, 95 model, fully rebuilt engine and braking system, full leather and a full MOT - (The seller is a mate and he is an MOT tester!) I was offered it for 700quid!!

Columbo

387 posts

208 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
Front wings are plastic on the williams too!

absolutely brilliant car, had number 0065 from nearly new!

brilliant car!

Eddh

4,656 posts

192 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
scratchchin I'm tempted really tempted.

Would make a nice photoshoot that and the Civic Jordan...

joz8968

1,042 posts

210 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
aaronc said:
No he's right about the 0-60 time. The williams had to change into 3rd gear to reach 60 so delayed it a second.

The williams was the best handling car i ever drove, like a go cart!

But beware, these things do cost a bit to run if not looked after, steering racks always common to go among other things.

But a classic in its own right.
I had a 137bhp Phase 1 16V (in its own slighty darker version of the blue) for about two years and the rack went too... as well as an engine mount (sounded like a big end had gone - freaked me right out). Gearbox went as well. Having previously owned a Ph.2 R5 turbo I knew what I'd probably be letting myself in for, prior to purchase!

That said, I did enjoy it in a sort of diametrically opposed way to the R5 (well, regarding the engine's characteristics anyway). Obviously with the Clio you have to ring its neck and forever stir the 'box - a typical early 16V'er - but, hey, if that's not involvement?!... It had great benign handling plus, in corners, you could cock its inside rear wheel by anything between 0 and 12inches!!! I think 6" was my average according to various 'spectators' (cue the jokes...). A fantastic pseudo mini-touring car rasp too (even on the standard back box).

My mate's g/f was thinking about getting a Willy <snigger> and I was a passenger in the test drive. You could genuinely feel the extra low- to mid-range grunt of the 2.0 over the 16V's 1.8, even though the difference was only 10lb ft (from memory, 129 plays 119). Presumably the extra 200cc of the Willy gave the engine more grunt low-down (as a comparison you had to get the 16V 'on-cam' at c.4750rpm before anything meaningful happened). Also, if memory serves, the Willy's exhaust manifold was a luuurv'ely genuine tubular jobbie.

Happy days...

Edited by joz8968 on Friday 11th July 16:59

joz8968

1,042 posts

210 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
Columbo said:
Front wings are plastic on the williams too!...
Yep, and on the 16V too. In fact weren't they on all of the Clio range, even the lowly cooking models? It was a nifty marketing ploy by Renault to advertise to the 17-25 age bracket that the wings could be replaced cheaply.

Edited by joz8968 on Friday 11th July 17:01

Gad-Westy

14,570 posts

213 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
Out of interest, are there many unique/expensive items on these or could one be bought at this sort of price and run cheaply with a little self servicing? Has got me thinking. There aren't many truly iconic (and relatively rare) cars available at this sort of money.

M5Player

98 posts

217 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
Still got mine - bought a Williams 3 brand new. Still only has 29k miles on it - love it to bits. way better than the later renaults I had for everyday.

joz8968

1,042 posts

210 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
Gad-Westy said:
Out of interest, are there many unique/expensive items on these or could one be bought at this sort of price and run cheaply with a little self servicing? Has got me thinking. There aren't many truly iconic (and relatively rare) cars available at this sort of money.
Honestly, the engines are bullet proof - just stick in at least a decent semi-synth every 6k (watch that level though - and don't RELY on the in-dash oil level gauge!) and you're done. Okay, there will be things that fail like racks, mounts etc, but over the course of a year any outlays won't be enough to pee you off (unless you're exceptionally unlucky!).

They are so much more robust than a Pug 1.9 GTi or an R5 turbo (at the expense of a bit of extra weight - quite a lot more compared to the R5)... But at least they don't feel like they're going to fall apart 100 yards up the road! They feel that bit more solid and grown-up but without losing too much of the all-important fun factor.

There are many Renault specialists to look after the more taxing servicing/repair jobs, etc. e.g. Prima (are they still about?), Yozzasport, Angelworks, GDI, etc. (just don't fork out unnecessarily at Renault franchises, that's all!). Go for it. It really is a car that you can cane the living daylights out of... and have some serious giggles in the process!

Edited by joz8968 on Friday 11th July 18:52

imclueless

208 posts

216 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
I had a 2 as a company car. Absolutely wonderful car. I have started to think of buying one as a run around. But finding one that hasn't been driven to the inch of its life....My orginal car has been crashed 2 or 3 times

joz8968

1,042 posts

210 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
Oli et al... what's with the new baby blue 'own posts' colour scheme?! Although it's not so in yer face as the 'radioactive-snot' green, it IS a fair bit harder to notice at a glance...

joz8968

1,042 posts

210 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
imclueless said:
I had a 2 as a company car. Absolutely wonderful car. I have started to think of buying one as a run around. But finding one that hasn't been driven to the inch of its life....My orginal car has been crashed 2 or 3 times
Unfortunately, given the age of the cars, it will be a long(ish) hunt to bag a 'good' 'un...

Edited by joz8968 on Friday 11th July 17:20