RE: Tramontana R Edition

RE: Tramontana R Edition

Author
Discussion

flemke

22,865 posts

237 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all

How could they possibly have got the weight up to 1259 - a cast-iron tub?

sprinter885

11,550 posts

227 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
You wouldn't want to park it up anywhere near Halfords or the chavs'd have them mirrors off !!

willcrookz

10,529 posts

194 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
beautiful!


Alfanatic

9,339 posts

219 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
Yet another one... though this one looks nice. As mentioned above though, it seems a bit heavy, and if those are 20 inch wheels I can believe the car is huge.

It says it's based on a standard open wheeler and then shortened... it also presumably seats its two people in tandem as there doesn't appear any space to get two people side by side. So what standard open wheeled car has a tandem two seat arrangement, or is big enough to accomodate that large engine and a second tandem seat but still have its wheelbase shortened? It's not the Xbow, Shirley?..

Edited by Alfanatic on Wednesday 25th February 12:18

clonmult

10,529 posts

209 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
willcrookz said:
beautiful!
Did you miss your specsavers appointment?

Snoggledog

7,037 posts

217 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
Kurbing carbon wheels. yikes

chuntington101

5,733 posts

236 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
as much as i really really want to like this car, i cant!

love the engine and the idea! hate the weight and it 'looks' wrong.

be intresting to see how it performs on a track compeard to established cars. im guessing not much faster if any....

Cheers

Chris.

scumbagjag

5,740 posts

231 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
The word "afterthought" springs to mind.

That and fugly, real fugly.

Mustang Baz

1,632 posts

234 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
Huge presence though - saw one at last years Le Mans - was huge and hugely aggressive to boot.

GPSS

694 posts

211 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
Not sure about the looks on that either, looks like it shares much with the spanish 7 that was in evo recently.
It seems that there are alot of companies now creating these type of supercars at £300k now, I wonder if exotic supercar ownership is the new yachting industry.

hayesey

92 posts

241 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
dkennedyvxt said:
Is it just me or does the 0-125 time look a bit lame for having all those horses and all that torque AND weighing less than a dieting ballerina.

An ultima GTR would kill that to 125 IIRC that get's to 100 in around 5.5????
are you joking? 1259kgs for a car like that is ridiculously heavy! No wonder it's not actually that fast when compared to similar things.

Carbon fibre bodywork is no good if you make the chassis out of depleted uranium.

leon9191

752 posts

193 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
Didnt luke skywalker have one of these in return of the jedi, or was that an x-wing class? Numbers are a little underwhelming, but it does have a certain presence i would say! Wouldnt pay for one but if they have one going spare.

Supervet

143 posts

207 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
Melman Giraffe said:
WTF!!
Quite! And it's old news (yet again).

Mark.H

5,713 posts

206 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
I had a walk around this at a recent motorshow out here, think of these pics as ones of a girl from a dating website, then seeing them in real life, waay uglier! The same thing applies here.

Godzilla

2,033 posts

249 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
Alfanatic said:
Yet another one... though this one looks nice. As mentioned above though, it seems a bit heavy, and if those are 20 inch wheels I can believe the car is huge.

It says it's based on a standard open wheeler and then shortened... it also presumably seats its two people in tandem as there doesn't appear any space to get two people side by side. So what standard open wheeled car has a tandem two seat arrangement, or is big enough to accomodate that large engine and a second tandem seat but still have its wheelbase shortened? It's not the Xbow, Shirley?..

Edited by Alfanatic on Wednesday 25th February 12:18
It's poorly explained, but they are referring to the "standard" Tramontana (like there were loads of those produced rolleyes ), hence this is the new "R Edition".

Adrian W

13,875 posts

228 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
Not sure about those numbers, 760bhp, 811lbs, 1259kilos, and then only 3.6 to 60 and 10.15secs to 125mph. unless it had the aero of the QE2 bridge they don't add up.

MrTappets

881 posts

191 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
Considering that it will be unusable on the road and too expensive/slow/breakable to dominate at a race track... what's the point? It's like a Pagani Zonda only less practical and with a badge that most people havn't heard of. And i agree with the above - it looks about the size of a aircraft carrier.

robm3

4,927 posts

227 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
hayesey said:
dkennedyvxt said:
Is it just me or does the 0-125 time look a bit lame for having all those horses and all that torque AND weighing less than a dieting ballerina.

An ultima GTR would kill that to 125 IIRC that get's to 100 in around 5.5????
are you joking? 1259kgs for a car like that is ridiculously heavy! No wonder it's not actually that fast when compared to similar things.

Carbon fibre bodywork is no good if you make the chassis out of depleted uranium.
+1, it's lardy...

Bizzle

544 posts

201 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
Yup,
Saw one at Lemans this year. Very impresive.

pgsmith

2 posts

182 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
That tall cockpit stuck on top makes it look like a piece of farm equipment.