RE: Is this the future of Mercedes-Benz?
Discussion
Two way hybrid?
Sinclair/Lotus7 with wheels stylised from "The Prisoner"?
Looks like an modern C2 and the Bicycle wheels tagged on to give Prisoner-ish styling combined with the Lotus 7 from the Intro credits.
These lightweight fun electric machines need a dose of power and performance to become anything like practical. Otherwise we will have roafs crowded with sucj rickshaws....
Sinclair/Lotus7 with wheels stylised from "The Prisoner"?
Looks like an modern C2 and the Bicycle wheels tagged on to give Prisoner-ish styling combined with the Lotus 7 from the Intro credits.
These lightweight fun electric machines need a dose of power and performance to become anything like practical. Otherwise we will have roafs crowded with sucj rickshaws....
dom9 said:
350Matt said:
this took 150 people a year!!!
I hope they were doing something else as well
It is strangely interesting... Yet I am thinking exactly the same, Matt!I hope they were doing something else as well
annodomini2 said:
durbster said:
annodomini2 said:
...Now if our cars are emitting water vapor (assuming the energy is coming from a 'clean' source), then ok the CO2 is reduced and has less retention in the atmosphere, but if we are emitting more water vapor anyway, it defeats the object.
Really shows you how BS is spouted around.
Err, I'm not being funny here but I really don't understand your point. You've explained exactly why it should work in order to claim it wouldn't. Really shows you how BS is spouted around.
durbster said:
annodomini2 said:
durbster said:
annodomini2 said:
...Now if our cars are emitting water vapor (assuming the energy is coming from a 'clean' source), then ok the CO2 is reduced and has less retention in the atmosphere, but if we are emitting more water vapor anyway, it defeats the object.
Really shows you how BS is spouted around.
Err, I'm not being funny here but I really don't understand your point. You've explained exactly why it should work in order to claim it wouldn't. Really shows you how BS is spouted around.
annodomini2 said:
durbster said:
annodomini2 said:
durbster said:
annodomini2 said:
...Now if our cars are emitting water vapor (assuming the energy is coming from a 'clean' source), then ok the CO2 is reduced and has less retention in the atmosphere, but if we are emitting more water vapor anyway, it defeats the object.
Really shows you how BS is spouted around.
Err, I'm not being funny here but I really don't understand your point. You've explained exactly why it should work in order to claim it wouldn't. Really shows you how BS is spouted around.
Jay leno's 1909 baker electric car seems better
http://www.jaylenosgarage.com/cars/Baker_E_shell.s...
http://www.jaylenosgarage.com/cars/Baker_E_shell.s...
Edited by CarMad426 on Saturday 28th March 13:55
Edited by CarMad426 on Saturday 28th March 13:56
durbster said:
annodomini2 said:
durbster said:
annodomini2 said:
durbster said:
annodomini2 said:
...Now if our cars are emitting water vapor (assuming the energy is coming from a 'clean' source), then ok the CO2 is reduced and has less retention in the atmosphere, but if we are emitting more water vapor anyway, it defeats the object.
Really shows you how BS is spouted around.
Err, I'm not being funny here but I really don't understand your point. You've explained exactly why it should work in order to claim it wouldn't. Really shows you how BS is spouted around.
It is not a total extra water that is the issue, it is total extra water in the atmosphere.
I can't see how it will make any difference. There's no extra water - there's a constant amount of water in the world - it's just being redistributed slightly.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff