RE: Audi Sport Diff Takes Off
Discussion
Lets see, more and more crowded roads, more speed limits so lets add extra complexity to make the cars go faster around corners. Winner idea.
The trouble with Germans is that they are slaves to the technical possibilities rather than the practical and commercially sensible. In tightened times with cheap travel coming from the third world - and even Rumanian Renault I think that Audi are in danger of disappearing up their own exhaust - sort of fundamentally flawed. : )
I hate to think of the on-costs of older Audi's with all the added complexity to potentially go wrong.
The trouble with Germans is that they are slaves to the technical possibilities rather than the practical and commercially sensible. In tightened times with cheap travel coming from the third world - and even Rumanian Renault I think that Audi are in danger of disappearing up their own exhaust - sort of fundamentally flawed. : )
I hate to think of the on-costs of older Audi's with all the added complexity to potentially go wrong.
toohuge said:
kambites said:
daveco said:
Why don't Audi just place the engine further into the engine bay on the RS models? This would help a fair amount to alleviate understeer.
Actually why do they position the engine that far forward?
I think it's to do with now the centre diff is arranged with Quatro. I was under the impression that the new A4 platform pushed the engine behind the axle line though, I'm sure I read that somewhere?Actually why do they position the engine that far forward?
Personally, i am not convinced by all this electronic differential business.
FesterNath said:
toohuge said:
kambites said:
daveco said:
Why don't Audi just place the engine further into the engine bay on the RS models? This would help a fair amount to alleviate understeer.
Actually why do they position the engine that far forward?
I think it's to do with now the centre diff is arranged with Quatro. I was under the impression that the new A4 platform pushed the engine behind the axle line though, I'm sure I read that somewhere?Actually why do they position the engine that far forward?
Personally, i am not convinced by all this electronic differential business.
MonkeyMatt said:
fluffnik said:
Neomagic said:
Not quite since, there many more variables in all the systems of the car.
It seems to use all the same inputs and do the same thing as the system in my 13 year old Mitsubishi......probably there to counteract the nose heavy understeeryness just like it does (rather well) in my 13 year old Mitsubishi.
The only thing I don't have is the variable damping.
ETA: ...or funky steering
Edited by fluffnik on Thursday 7th May 17:12
Wonder if the new Audi design requires the 4500 mile fluid changes like the Mitsi does..
MonkeyMatt said:
So its like you old Mitsubish only newer and better with more features
Yup. It's a good system, as implemented by Mitsubishi, effectively counteracting the nose heaviness and tendency to understeer of the base FWD car and producing something balanced and pointy in its place.
It's a little unsettling in operation due to the feeling that it's tucking both ends of the car in at once, and I'd like to find out what happens when the AYC's capacity is exceeded somewhere spacious before testing its limits on the road, but it undoubtedly makes a big car more nimble than it has any real right to be...
If Audi's system works near as well it will be a Good Thing.
Edited by fluffnik on Friday 8th May 15:28
collateral said:
FesterNath said:
toohuge said:
kambites said:
daveco said:
Why don't Audi just place the engine further into the engine bay on the RS models? This would help a fair amount to alleviate understeer.
Actually why do they position the engine that far forward?
I think it's to do with now the centre diff is arranged with Quatro. I was under the impression that the new A4 platform pushed the engine behind the axle line though, I'm sure I read that somewhere?Actually why do they position the engine that far forward?
Personally, i am not convinced by all this electronic differential business.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FMR_layout
brogenville said:
So they've basically come up with active yaw control (albeit under a different name), as designed by mitsubish oh... 13 years ago?
Yep, all those 'e' diff things that Ferrari, BMW and everyone else have been banging on about for the past few years are also basically the same thing, but only for 2wd. Honda had a similar diff on the front wheel drive Prelude a year after mitsubishi called ATTS, and they've been in motorsports for a while as well.Arguably Porsche first came up with it in the 959, which had an electronically controlled AWD system, although I'm not sure it was sophisticated enough to apportion torque to individual wheels, merely to front and rear. The Nissan Skyline GT-R R32 was probably the first car produced in numbers to get the technology.
SleeperCell said:
Someones even made a list, which seems to include the majority of modern front engined sports cars.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FMR_layout
Including the mighty Reliant Robin. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FMR_layout
collateral said:
FesterNath said:
toohuge said:
kambites said:
daveco said:
Why don't Audi just place the engine further into the engine bay on the RS models? This would help a fair amount to alleviate understeer.
Actually why do they position the engine that far forward?
I think it's to do with now the centre diff is arranged with Quatro. I was under the impression that the new A4 platform pushed the engine behind the axle line though, I'm sure I read that somewhere?Actually why do they position the engine that far forward?
Personally, i am not convinced by all this electronic differential business.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff