RE: Lotus Unveils 'Range Extender'

RE: Lotus Unveils 'Range Extender'

Author
Discussion

Mr Will

13,719 posts

207 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
Insight said:
is this not the same technology as my car, the Honda Insight (that is over 10 years old?)

"The gasoline engine is a 70 hp (52 kW; 71 PS), 1-liter, ECA series 3-cylinder unit providing lean burn operation with an air fuel ratio that can reach 25.8 to 1.[10] The electrical motor assist adds in another 10 kW (13 hp) when called on, and similarly provides significant deceleration when used in regenerative mode for braking. (This both improves fuel efficiency and also dramatically extends the lifetime of brakes). When the car is not moving, for example, at a stop light, the engine shuts off. The digital displays on the dashboard display fuel consumption instantaneously. On the manual transmission up and down arrows suggest when to shift gears."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_Insight
Nope, the idea with the Lotus engine is that it is not connected to the wheels and never directly powers the car at all. It is basically a glorified generator which recharges the batteries whenever they get low.

This has the potential to be far more efficient than any current hybrid, especially at motorway speeds, as the engine can always be operating at peak efficiency rather than having to vary it's RPM to match the road speed.

bosscerbera

8,188 posts

244 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
stifler said:
Off Topic but back in the sixties there was a concept going around the car mags of a 6 wheeled car to be called the British Lion. It was to have an engine driving a hydraulic pump with a hydraulic motor in each upright driving all 6 wheels. It never got any budget iirc.
Sounds like some JCB models! smile

ctallchris

1,266 posts

180 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
bosscerbera said:
The Lotus motor's 35kW isn't much power whatever way it's used to 'extend-a-range' though. And if several were to be used, even two creates a 'weight budget' that would enable a much more powerful engine to be used. kW/BHP-per-kg (noted, motor/generator included) doesn't look very impressive - maybe it's exceptionally cheap?
I think 45bhp would be quite sufficient. after all when my tvr's trundling along at 70 mph it only needs about 25bhp to keep it at that speed. If you decellerate you get 80 % of the energy you need to accelerate back up to speed from regenerative braking and the rest can come from the battery (which if you're driving fairly smothly should have had 20bhp worth of energy pumped into it of a couple of minutes and the batteries will be able to release that energy in a couple of seconds to make you shoot up to speed. It would a fairly average car to driving at a constant 80 - 85 mph. Due to the power delivery this probably wouldn't feel sluggish / strained because there would be extra power it just wouldn't last too long.

ctallchris

1,266 posts

180 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
Insight said:
is this not the same technology as my car, the Honda Insight (that is over 10 years old?)

"The gasoline engine is a 70 hp (52 kW; 71 PS), 1-liter, ECA series 3-cylinder unit providing lean burn operation with an air fuel ratio that can reach 25.8 to 1.[10] The electrical motor assist adds in another 10 kW (13 hp) when called on, and similarly provides significant deceleration when used in regenerative mode for braking. (This both improves fuel efficiency and also dramatically extends the lifetime of brakes). When the car is not moving, for example, at a stop light, the engine shuts off. The digital displays on the dashboard display fuel consumption instantaneously. On the manual transmission up and down arrows suggest when to shift gears."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_Insight
If your car could run at 70 mph for 2 hours entirely from the batteries it would be. Lotus's concept marries with the concept of the plug in hybrid - essentially an electric car for daily use but for those few times a year when you want to go on a family holiday to cornwall you can drive there without needing to spend a couple of hours charging along the way.

Essentially your car is no different from other petrol cars once it exceeds the capabilities of the electric drivetrain but it is nowhere near as efficient as a serial hybrid over the first 100 miles or so (99% of trips for most people)

wooooody

918 posts

238 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
Insight said:
is this not the same technology as my car, the Honda Insight (that is over 10 years old?)

"The gasoline engine is a 70 hp (52 kW; 71 PS), 1-liter, ECA series 3-cylinder unit providing lean burn operation with an air fuel ratio that can reach 25.8 to 1.[10] The electrical motor assist adds in another 10 kW (13 hp) when called on, and similarly provides significant deceleration when used in regenerative mode for braking. (This both improves fuel efficiency and also dramatically extends the lifetime of brakes). When the car is not moving, for example, at a stop light, the engine shuts off. The digital displays on the dashboard display fuel consumption instantaneously. On the manual transmission up and down arrows suggest when to shift gears."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_Insight
No.

Neil G60

692 posts

225 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
I think it’s good to see Britain innovating and looking to the future. Some actual R&D rather than relying on other countries’ output.

Tony*T3

20,911 posts

248 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
stuart-b said:
The idea seems good, but power and RPM seem rather limited? How come it only revs to 3,500 rpm?? Surely this will make it pretty tiring to drive? As max power is max RPM.

Not sure what car over 500kg, could make use of this?
Its a glorified battery recharger. Never directly drives the wheels.

mikemmb

16 posts

211 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
bosscerbera said:
Monoblocks are not a Lotus innovation.

Looks interesting though. smile
The 1084cc ALFA produced in 1911 shows that the monoblock engine isn't a Lotus innovation.

http://www.4-seater.com/

Anyone know of an earlier example?

Mike

Mr Whippy

29,060 posts

242 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
How pointless.

Isn't it shown, in the 'real world', that a small diesel will blow these silly hybrid things into the weeds on efficiency?

Dave

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

256 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
Neil G60 said:
I think it’s good to see Britain innovating and looking to the future. Some actual R&D rather than relying on other countries’ output.
yesthumbup

Conian

8,030 posts

202 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
can i fit one of these to each of my wheels? smile

ctallchris

1,266 posts

180 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
Mr Whippy said:
How pointless.

Isn't it shown, in the 'real world', that a small diesel will blow these silly hybrid things into the weeds on efficiency?

Dave
Parallel hybrids yes

Serial hybrids absolutely not no way ever

http://karma.fiskerautomotive.com/

400 bhp hybrid with some insane economy figures

DP 1

1,219 posts

194 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
Well I'd swap it for the 1.2 in my corsa! :P

jaik

2,002 posts

214 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
How about a diesel serial hybrid then?

Conian

8,030 posts

202 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
jaik said:
How about a diesel serial hybrid then?
made from adamantium smile

oli_quick

380 posts

230 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all

ctallchris

1,266 posts

180 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
jaik said:
How about a diesel serial hybrid then?
diesils are more efficient because they run at a higher compression so it's theoreticaly better. However in a serial hybrid the engine is only used a small portion of the time (for example when the car has allready travelled 60 miles that day) With my driving this would probably average about 5 -10 miles a week (or a litre of fuel or so)

Because of this the extra cost of manufacturing a diesel engine will probably never be paid for by a slight gain in efficiency. Also as the torque no longer matters the benifits of the diesil falls further away from the petrol.

Diesels could be practical for parallel hybrids for say taxis / busses or other vehicles where they will exceed this range on a daily basis.

hahithestevieboy

845 posts

215 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
Indeed, I'm rather confused why they have not made a diesel jenny instead as they have higher thermodynamic efficiency than petrol engines?

I would have said that to measure whether or not this is actually a good engine, you would need to measure it by the following metrics:

KwH (electric) per Unit of Fuel used
overall cost (manufacture and maintanence) per kilowat of power or indeed kwh over its lifetime.
weight per killowatt.

Needless to say, single speed engines can be vasly more efficient..

oagent

1,794 posts

244 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
Monoblocks have one very nice feature; Theres no head gasket.
They were fairly popular in the 30's on supercharged Bentleys etc, then again in the turbo F1 days, and all because you can run higher boost pressure when theres no gasket to worry about. So pop a variable boost turbo on this unit and you have the potential to get decent power if required.

Mr Whippy

29,060 posts

242 months

Tuesday 8th September 2009
quotequote all
ctallchris said:
Mr Whippy said:
How pointless.

Isn't it shown, in the 'real world', that a small diesel will blow these silly hybrid things into the weeds on efficiency?

Dave
Parallel hybrids yes

Serial hybrids absolutely not no way ever

http://karma.fiskerautomotive.com/

400 bhp hybrid with some insane economy figures
So what are the economy figures?

From what I have seen, a great deal of the apparent 'benefit' of a hybrid on paper is that it starts the relatively short CO2 cycle run on a full battery. That makes them appear great, and since manufacturers have targets around CO2, they make them.

In reality, are they actually much better, or are the 'economy figures' misleading due to benefits put on hybrids?

Dave