The 'Cars you should own' thread...

The 'Cars you should own' thread...

Author
Discussion

Escort2dr

3,619 posts

202 months

Wednesday 2nd December 2009
quotequote all
KingRichard said:
Mark A S said:
Any Mk 1 or 2 Escort, RS/Mexico or similar smile

Ooh, good shout. Never driven a RWD escort!
Absolutely. That's why I built my Mk2 up, sold it, then bought it back again 6 years later and had it restored:


Fruitcake

3,850 posts

227 months

Wednesday 2nd December 2009
quotequote all
speedtwelve said:


As a TVR owner I was tempted to add my own car, but if I'm honest, the Elise S1 is the biggest eye-opener I've ever pedalled. It really is just on another level, the steering is so direct, the chassis response instantaneous, and the whole thing seems free of inertia. The minimalist, bare aluminium in the cockpit, the driving position, the precise feedback of the unservoed brakes, it's just great. I haven't sampled a Caterham, but so far the little Lotus is the closest thing to a Formula Ford that I've driven with a tax disc.
yes Wot 'e sed.

You can keep your hypercars and whatnot, an Elise is a car every petrolhead should own, so they can feel what proper steering and handling balance is. One of the best sports cars ever built (especially the S1) and I really do aspire to own one.


Fruitcake

3,850 posts

227 months

Wednesday 2nd December 2009
quotequote all
I've thought for a long time that petrolheads hsould own a well set-up classic.

My hope is for one of these:


1BJ

143 posts

174 months

Wednesday 2nd December 2009
quotequote all
IL_JDM]i love 106's etc said:
Would much rather spend that money on something rwd. Great that you are quite enthusiastic about them though and I agree they are cool.

Garlick

40,601 posts

241 months

Wednesday 2nd December 2009
quotequote all
Classy, cool, V8 powered, luxurious and getting rare. Forget a modern SUV and get one of these. I love mine.



What an excellent pic too, says it all.

B'stard Child

28,423 posts

247 months

Wednesday 2nd December 2009
quotequote all
Stedman said:


740i.

And another yes for a X308/350 XJR. Yum.
I'll agree with the Jaguar - when I reach that age but the 7 - nope overated by a country mile although it's mpg is impressive

Some nice choices in here I'm working thro my own list

205 GTi
Lotus
TVR
Aston Martin Vantage (old one)
Porsche (cos Domster has beaten it into me)
Jaguar (waiting to come of age)
Bristol (as above)

jackal

11,248 posts

283 months

Wednesday 2nd December 2009
quotequote all
your motoring life will never be complete until youve done it






CDP

7,460 posts

255 months

Wednesday 2nd December 2009
quotequote all
FSO Polonez

I had one. It was very cheap £800 for a sub three year old car. Even though it was slow the prospect of more power was actually alarming (apparently they did a version with the 2 litre FIAT twin cam). On hard cornering the back of the car sort of weaved around on it's leaf springs. The steering was heavy and low geared with no discernable feel. It felt top heavy and just plain nasty.

The build was astonishingly crude and rust was already beginning to appear. The engine sounded like it was broken but every other FSO I'd heard was exactly the same.

When you've owned one of these you can appreciate just about every other car on the planet.

Unfortunately there's only a dozen or so left in the UK so you'd be very lucky (do I mean that?) to find one.

Edited to ask if I've missed the point of the thread?


Edited by CDP on Thursday 3rd December 00:01

JR

12,722 posts

259 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
Twincam16 said:
KingRichard said:
Isn't Monteverdi the only swiss car manufacturer?
There's Rinspeed and Sbarro as well.
and Graber (Herman.)

RacingTeatray

2,495 posts

217 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
Garlick said:
Classy, cool, V8 powered, luxurious and getting rare. Forget a modern SUV and get one of these. I love mine.



What an excellent pic too, says it all.
Yes, lovely, but my parents had two - a 3.9 Vogue SE and then a 4.2 Vogue LSE. The first nearly killed my stepmother when she applied the brakes at circa 85mph on the motorway and the thing swerved uncontrollably into a neighbouring field owing to a latent fault in the suspension. The second nearly killed me after something went awry with the engine management system that meant if you took your foot off the brake it would accelerate from rest to 70mph without any need to press the accelerator. I was driving it on the motorway in the south of France when it first happened and very nearly demolished a peage station because I didn't realise enough in advance that it was going to take superhuman effort to get the wretched car to stop. Was quite an eventful drive home too as getting there meant taking the precipitous corniches above Monaco, which are fairly nervy in something with the size and roadholding of a classic Range Rover at the best of times, but particularly in one that constantly tries to gallop off into the distance at top whack. Smoke was pouring from the brakes by the time I reached the house and my nerves were fried. It's put me off having one ever since.

Edited by RacingTeatray on Thursday 3rd December 10:12

jamieboy

5,911 posts

230 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
RacingTeatray said:
The second nearly killed me after something went awry with the engine management system that meant if you took your foot off the brake it would accelerate to 70mph without any need to press the accelerator.
hehe When I was little we had a Lonsdale, which was a Mitsubishi Galant imported via Australia to avoid the import restrictions on Japanese cars. I think.

Anyway, there were only two of them in our area - ours would occasionally decide to run at idle regardless of how hard you pressed the throttle pedal, the other would apparently go to full throttle, just as you describe. On balance, I think we got the good one. smile

Garlick

40,601 posts

241 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
Blimey! Mine hasn't tried to kill me......yet.

BLUETHUNDER

7,881 posts

261 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
RacingTeatray said:
Garlick said:
Classy, cool, V8 powered, luxurious and getting rare. Forget a modern SUV and get one of these. I love mine.



What an excellent pic too, says it all.
Yes, lovely, but my parents had two - a 3.9 Vogue SE and then a 4.2 Vogue LSE. The first nearly killed my stepmother when she applied the brakes at circa 85mph on the motorway and the thing swerved uncontrollably into a neighbouring field owing to a latent fault in the suspension. The second nearly killed me after something went awry with the engine management system that meant if you took your foot off the brake it would accelerate from rest to 70mph without any need to press the accelerator. I was driving it on the motorway in the south of France when it first happened and very nearly demolished a peage station because I didn't realise enough in advance that it was going to take superhuman effort to get the wretched car to stop. Was quite an eventful drive home too as getting there meant taking the precipitous corniches above Monaco, which are fairly nervy in something with the size and roadholding of a classic Range Rover at the best of times, but particularly in one that constantly tries to gallop off into the distance at top whack. Smoke was pouring from the brakes by the time I reached the house and my nerves were fried. It's put me off having one ever since.

Edited by RacingTeatray on Thursday 3rd December 10:12
I find that a little hard to believe. Unless the there was some catostrophic fault with the cruise control,then i struggle to see how the engine management system caused your car to go from 0-70 in the flick of a heart beat.

The management system on a classic is basic to say the least,and there is no fly-by-throttle to further hamper problems.

Edited by BLUETHUNDER on Thursday 3rd December 10:26

RacingTeatray

2,495 posts

217 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
It's what's making me hold back on enquiring on this: http://www.graemehunt.com/motor-cars/for-sale/1994...

It looks too similar to the one we had and a runaway LSE with a 'Vette engine might prove unstoppable!! Would sound epic in the process though!!

RacingTeatray

2,495 posts

217 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
BLUETHUNDER said:
RacingTeatray said:
Garlick said:
Classy, cool, V8 powered, luxurious and getting rare. Forget a modern SUV and get one of these. I love mine.



What an excellent pic too, says it all.
Yes, lovely, but my parents had two - a 3.9 Vogue SE and then a 4.2 Vogue LSE. The first nearly killed my stepmother when she applied the brakes at circa 85mph on the motorway and the thing swerved uncontrollably into a neighbouring field owing to a latent fault in the suspension. The second nearly killed me after something went awry with the engine management system that meant if you took your foot off the brake it would accelerate from rest to 70mph without any need to press the accelerator. I was driving it on the motorway in the south of France when it first happened and very nearly demolished a peage station because I didn't realise enough in advance that it was going to take superhuman effort to get the wretched car to stop. Was quite an eventful drive home too as getting there meant taking the precipitous corniches above Monaco, which are fairly nervy in something with the size and roadholding of a classic Range Rover at the best of times, but particularly in one that constantly tries to gallop off into the distance at top whack. Smoke was pouring from the brakes by the time I reached the house and my nerves were fried. It's put me off having one ever since.

Edited by RacingTeatray on Thursday 3rd December 10:12
I find that a little hard to believe. Unless the there was some catostrophic fault with the cruise control,then i struggle to see how the engine management system caused your car to go from 0-70 in the flick of a heart beat.

The management system on a classic is basic to say the least,and theer is no fly-by-throttle to further hamper problems.
I have no idea what was actually wrong with it - only that it very much did do it, whether you choose to believe it or not! I was only assuming it was an engine management issue but given it was my father's company car, working out what was wrong with it was not my or his issue. And we are talking about something that must have happened pre-1996, given that Dad upgraded to an even less reliable 4.6 HSE when that was launched.

Edited by RacingTeatray on Thursday 3rd December 10:30

BLUETHUNDER

7,881 posts

261 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
In all the years i have owned and been around RR,s that is a first for me. The later P38 with its far more complex BECM was troublesome. But i never even heard of that sort of problem with them.

DickyC

49,769 posts

199 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
After ten enjoyable years of owning an early Range Rover, I advertised in 1991 as "quietly biodegrading" for £1500 and a bloke sent me a cheque for the full amount without seeing it.

A marvellous car.


RacingTeatray

2,495 posts

217 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
Maybe so. But it really did happen. Besides, it would be an odd thing to make up. I remember it because it was one of the scariest things that's ever happened to me in a car. When I got the car stopped at the peage booth, it was straining hard against the brakes so stupidly I put it into N and the revs shot sky-high so I had to hastily turn the engine off for fear of it blowing up (I was 19 and not hugely mechanically literate). I then checked the carpet wasn't sticking the accelerator down somehow, but it wasn't that and the pedal seemed to be moving normally. It transpired that when you turned the car back on, it seemed ok and normal, but then as soon as you moved off, the problem would instantly return. Which is why I guessed it was something to do with electronics governing the throttle.

And yes, the HSE was far less reliable. It used to pee vital fluids with worrisome regularity and never ever felt like it had 4.6 litres of heft under the bonnet. It also blew some gasket or other at 100mph on the autostrada once - suddenly we became aware that behind us the car was creating its very own fogbank. That was the last straw for Dad who switched to the then new Audi Allroad and has stuck with Audis ever since.

Twincam16

27,646 posts

259 months

Wednesday 9th December 2009
quotequote all
I'd go with Top Gear and, in biased mood, suggest you need to own an Alfa, simply to realise that you can have a family car that puts a smile on your face when you hurl it into a bend. Alfas are 'hope' for people with ordinary lives. Life infused with 'Essence of Maserati'.

I'm also tempted to say a 'Fast Ford' of some sort, if only to realise the rather staggering performance and handling potential of the most 'ordinary' of car 'recipes'.

GregE240

10,857 posts

268 months

Wednesday 9th December 2009
quotequote all
I agree with Twinners, a fast Ford of some sort, if only for the hilariously cheap running costs.

Alfas do nothing for me, I'm afraid. All of my friends who have ever owned one from an Alfasud through to 147s and 156s were plagued by spaghetti build standard gremlins. That to me isn't characterful, its just irritating.