RE: Driven: BMW X6M
Discussion
Zod said:
Don't be ridiculous, robski. The M5/M6 and M3 have completely bespoke Motorsport engines for the first time in M GmbH's history. They are obviously true M cars.
The engines yes!but when did you last see a motorspot car with all the seats, leather, electric everything, satnav ,cd changer but with some carbon trim to save weight!Edited by robsti on Wednesday 30th December 22:48
robsti said:
Edited by RobM77 on Wednesday 30th December 00:45
I wont for a moment try and defend the riding dynamics of Harleys because they are total st but they do one thing better than most is hold there value!Previous bikes owned inclued GPZ900R, ZXR750RR, R1 so dont talk to me about lightness and power to weight ratio!
The definition of a gay car is one that makes the driver look like a girl not the car itself or how god it handles ie boxter,z4,mgf,slk,sl,206cc some of which are very good cars but classed as gay !imo.
Then the 645ci,It has been remaped to improve throtle response and adds anothere 30+ BHP.The z4 35i sDrive is only about 50kg lighter than the 645ci so if you plonk in a heavier v8 I doubt there will be a great weight saving! and I can take 4 people and there luggage in total comfort try that in your look at me gay car!
I am sorry if I offended you but I never slagged off your vehicles but if it makes you feel better about yourself and your cars to do it to others then so be it!
P.S As for the iconic Z4M coupe as you so call it! one off my mates got one of the first ones in the country who by the way raced Extremes ,Minis and carts sold it after 3 months because of the way it darted dangerously all over b roads which you would imagine would be its domain. Power is nothing without control!
Happy Newyear.
Thus a great many don't care about dynamics or suitability for purpose, all that matters is how you look. Thus a great many men have to have something that makes them look tough and butch. For some reason.
Hence my post about football shirts. Some buy them to play football in, but most are now probably bought by those seeking to achieve a certain 'look', and these football shirts are now thought perfectly suitable to wear when appearing in court, or even at a childs funeral nowadays, it seems.
But I have 2 comments about this. When one buys a car for the 'look', who is supposed to be looking? Anyone that matters? And why do all the girls round where i live all seek to buy 4x4's, the bigger the better, and not sports cars? Round here the Q7s all seem to be driven by petite blonds.
So if i want to look like a girl, clearly i need a 4x4. I think you're out of touch, robsti.
I think people miss the point about the M brand in the modern world.
Lets be realistic. If M cars were all stripped out, lightweight, focused drivers cars there would be one, massive, impossible to ignore problem: BMW would not sell enough of them...
I suspect that BMW are using the M brand to market their top end models. And when people in global markets want the top of the range version, they expect all the toys. From Miami to Bahrain, Shanghai to Moscow, Jakarta to Bogota, the majority of buyers want a sporty car plus all the toys. That is the way it is I suspect and BMW know that. Those markets will love the X6M.
I wonder if perhaps the niche, low volume stuff that people here get all moist about, is likely to carry CSL badges in future, leaving M cars to sit neatly at the top of the BMW branding tree.
Lets be realistic. If M cars were all stripped out, lightweight, focused drivers cars there would be one, massive, impossible to ignore problem: BMW would not sell enough of them...
I suspect that BMW are using the M brand to market their top end models. And when people in global markets want the top of the range version, they expect all the toys. From Miami to Bahrain, Shanghai to Moscow, Jakarta to Bogota, the majority of buyers want a sporty car plus all the toys. That is the way it is I suspect and BMW know that. Those markets will love the X6M.
I wonder if perhaps the niche, low volume stuff that people here get all moist about, is likely to carry CSL badges in future, leaving M cars to sit neatly at the top of the BMW branding tree.
robsti said:
Boxster Cabrio? Will there be a Cayman Cabrio at some point? Just shows the difference between marketing and reality though eh? As much as i'd love to believe that such gorgeous babes would flock round my Boxster, I'm still fat, bald and middle-aged, which is why i don't understand the need-to-be-seen thing.
I reckon if i applied the black tint to my windows and never got out of the car, i could pull with my Porsche.
robsti said:
Zod said:
Don't be ridiculous, robski. The M5/M6 and M3 have completely bespoke Motorsport engines for the first time in M GmbH's history. They are obviously true M cars.
The engines yes!but when did you last see a motorspot car with all the seats, leather, electric everything, satnav ,cd changer but with some carbon trim to save weight!Edited by robsti on Wednesday 30th December 22:48
And what the fk is the problem with satnav? It weighs two kg! The GT3 has satnav too.
Zod said:
robsti said:
Zod said:
Don't be ridiculous, robski. The M5/M6 and M3 have completely bespoke Motorsport engines for the first time in M GmbH's history. They are obviously true M cars.
The engines yes!but when did you last see a motorspot car with all the seats, leather, electric everything, satnav ,cd changer but with some carbon trim to save weight!Edited by robsti on Wednesday 30th December 22:48
And what the fk is the problem with satnav? It weighs two kg! The GT3 has satnav too.
robsti said:
Zod said:
robsti said:
Zod said:
Don't be ridiculous, robski. The M5/M6 and M3 have completely bespoke Motorsport engines for the first time in M GmbH's history. They are obviously true M cars.
The engines yes!but when did you last see a motorspot car with all the seats, leather, electric everything, satnav ,cd changer but with some carbon trim to save weight!Edited by robsti on Wednesday 30th December 22:48
And what the fk is the problem with satnav? It weighs two kg! The GT3 has satnav too.
Your other comment confused me too: since when did performance mean a car wasn't designed for the road, and comforts make it more suitable for the road?!! Most performance road cars are not designed with the track or racing in mind (everything from the NSX to the Mclaren F1 - none were designed with racing in mind at all), they were designed as performance road cars that are pleasing to drive for people like us, just like a BMW M car is nowadays. I understand that the days of M cars produced for homologation are over, but they're still performance cars! The very notion of a performance road car with four wheel drive, a near 2 tonne kerb weight and a whole load of ground clearance is just wrong. I saw an X6M yesterday (I work opposite a large BMW office) and yes, it's a bonkers thing and I'm glad cars like that exist these days, but it should not be produced before and in preference to a Z4M and a 1 series M; those cars have low CofGs and are smaller, and therefore have a more natural inclination to performance. BMW spending money on producing a "motorsport" version of the X5 is just ridiculous when they're not doing the same of their sports cars like the Z4. If you want comfort first and performance second, I'd reccomend you buy a car like the 645i (funny that!). If you're a driving enthusiast who wants comfort for everyday use then an M car would be suitable.
Edited by RobM77 on Saturday 9th January 14:24
RobM77 said:
robsti said:
Zod said:
robsti said:
Zod said:
Don't be ridiculous, robski. The M5/M6 and M3 have completely bespoke Motorsport engines for the first time in M GmbH's history. They are obviously true M cars.
The engines yes!but when did you last see a motorspot car with all the seats, leather, electric everything, satnav ,cd changer but with some carbon trim to save weight!Edited by robsti on Wednesday 30th December 22:48
And what the fk is the problem with satnav? It weighs two kg! The GT3 has satnav too.
Your other comment confused me too: since when did performance mean a car wasn't designed for the road, and comforts make it more suitable for the road?!! Most performance road cars are not designed with the track or racing in mind (everything from the NSX to the Mclaren F1 - none were designed with racing in mind at all), they were designed as performance road cars that are pleasing to drive for people like us, just like a BMW M car is nowadays. I understand that the days of M cars produced for homologation are over, but they're still performance cars! The very notion of a performance road car with four wheel drive, a near 2 tonne kerb weight and a whole load of ground clearance is just wrong. I saw an X6M yesterday (I work opposite a large BMW office) and yes, it's a bonkers thing and I'm glad cars like that exist these days, but it should not be produced before and in preference to a Z4M and a 1 series M; those cars have low CofGs and are smaller, and therefore have a more natural inclination to performance. BMW spending money on producing a "motorsport" version of the X5 is just ridiculous when they're not doing the same of their sports cars like the Z4. If you want comfort first and performance second, I'd reccomend you buy a car like the 645i (funny that!). If you're a driving enthusiast who wants comfort for everyday use then an M car would be suitable.
Edited by RobM77 on Saturday 9th January 14:24
Edited by robsti on Sunday 10th January 14:31
robsti said:
RobM77 said:
robsti said:
Zod said:
robsti said:
Zod said:
Don't be ridiculous, robski. The M5/M6 and M3 have completely bespoke Motorsport engines for the first time in M GmbH's history. They are obviously true M cars.
The engines yes!but when did you last see a motorspot car with all the seats, leather, electric everything, satnav ,cd changer but with some carbon trim to save weight!Edited by robsti on Wednesday 30th December 22:48
And what the fk is the problem with satnav? It weighs two kg! The GT3 has satnav too.
Your other comment confused me too: since when did performance mean a car wasn't designed for the road, and comforts make it more suitable for the road?!! Most performance road cars are not designed with the track or racing in mind (everything from the NSX to the Mclaren F1 - none were designed with racing in mind at all), they were designed as performance road cars that are pleasing to drive for people like us, just like a BMW M car is nowadays. I understand that the days of M cars produced for homologation are over, but they're still performance cars! The very notion of a performance road car with four wheel drive, a near 2 tonne kerb weight and a whole load of ground clearance is just wrong. I saw an X6M yesterday (I work opposite a large BMW office) and yes, it's a bonkers thing and I'm glad cars like that exist these days, but it should not be produced before and in preference to a Z4M and a 1 series M; those cars have low CofGs and are smaller, and therefore have a more natural inclination to performance. BMW spending money on producing a "motorsport" version of the X5 is just ridiculous when they're not doing the same of their sports cars like the Z4. If you want comfort first and performance second, I'd reccomend you buy a car like the 645i (funny that!). If you're a driving enthusiast who wants comfort for everyday use then an M car would be suitable.
Edited by RobM77 on Saturday 9th January 14:24
Edited by robsti on Sunday 10th January 14:04
We started this because you stated that a 400bhp V8 hard top only Z4M would be a "gay" car, and yet somehow an X6M isn't. Firstly, this is supposed to be a forum for petrolheads, and we've got someone like you saying that a 400bhp driver-focused rear drive coupé is "gay", and a big off roader is "not gay". That's the opinion of a 16 year old girl, and you're entitled to it, but please don't start insulting people if they disagree with you.
Edited by RobM77 on Sunday 10th January 14:33
RobM77 said:
robsti said:
RobM77 said:
robsti said:
Zod said:
robsti said:
Zod said:
Don't be ridiculous, robski. The M5/M6 and M3 have completely bespoke Motorsport engines for the first time in M GmbH's history. They are obviously true M cars.
The engines yes!but when did you last see a motorspot car with all the seats, leather, electric everything, satnav ,cd changer but with some carbon trim to save weight!Edited by robsti on Wednesday 30th December 22:48
And what the fk is the problem with satnav? It weighs two kg! The GT3 has satnav too.
Your other comment confused me too: since when did performance mean a car wasn't designed for the road, and comforts make it more suitable for the road?!! Most performance road cars are not designed with the track or racing in mind (everything from the NSX to the Mclaren F1 - none were designed with racing in mind at all), they were designed as performance road cars that are pleasing to drive for people like us, just like a BMW M car is nowadays. I understand that the days of M cars produced for homologation are over, but they're still performance cars! The very notion of a performance road car with four wheel drive, a near 2 tonne kerb weight and a whole load of ground clearance is just wrong. I saw an X6M yesterday (I work opposite a large BMW office) and yes, it's a bonkers thing and I'm glad cars like that exist these days, but it should not be produced before and in preference to a Z4M and a 1 series M; those cars have low CofGs and are smaller, and therefore have a more natural inclination to performance. BMW spending money on producing a "motorsport" version of the X5 is just ridiculous when they're not doing the same of their sports cars like the Z4. If you want comfort first and performance second, I'd reccomend you buy a car like the 645i (funny that!). If you're a driving enthusiast who wants comfort for everyday use then an M car would be suitable.
Edited by RobM77 on Saturday 9th January 14:24
Edited by robsti on Sunday 10th January 14:04
We started this because you stated that a 400bhp V8 hard top only Z4M would be a "gay" car, and yet somehow an X6M isn't. Firstly, this is supposed to be a forum for petrolheads, and we've got someone like you saying that a 400bhp driver-focused rear drive coupé is "gay", and a big off roader is "not gay". That's the opinion of a 16 year old girl, and you're entitled to it, but please don't start insulting people if they disagree with you.
Edited by RobM77 on Sunday 10th January 14:25
If 16 year old girls are your thing at least you have got the right cars
robsti said:
RobM77 said:
robsti said:
RobM77 said:
robsti said:
Zod said:
robsti said:
Zod said:
Don't be ridiculous, robski. The M5/M6 and M3 have completely bespoke Motorsport engines for the first time in M GmbH's history. They are obviously true M cars.
The engines yes!but when did you last see a motorspot car with all the seats, leather, electric everything, satnav ,cd changer but with some carbon trim to save weight!Edited by robsti on Wednesday 30th December 22:48
And what the fk is the problem with satnav? It weighs two kg! The GT3 has satnav too.
Your other comment confused me too: since when did performance mean a car wasn't designed for the road, and comforts make it more suitable for the road?!! Most performance road cars are not designed with the track or racing in mind (everything from the NSX to the Mclaren F1 - none were designed with racing in mind at all), they were designed as performance road cars that are pleasing to drive for people like us, just like a BMW M car is nowadays. I understand that the days of M cars produced for homologation are over, but they're still performance cars! The very notion of a performance road car with four wheel drive, a near 2 tonne kerb weight and a whole load of ground clearance is just wrong. I saw an X6M yesterday (I work opposite a large BMW office) and yes, it's a bonkers thing and I'm glad cars like that exist these days, but it should not be produced before and in preference to a Z4M and a 1 series M; those cars have low CofGs and are smaller, and therefore have a more natural inclination to performance. BMW spending money on producing a "motorsport" version of the X5 is just ridiculous when they're not doing the same of their sports cars like the Z4. If you want comfort first and performance second, I'd reccomend you buy a car like the 645i (funny that!). If you're a driving enthusiast who wants comfort for everyday use then an M car would be suitable.
Edited by RobM77 on Saturday 9th January 14:24
Edited by robsti on Sunday 10th January 14:04
We started this because you stated that a 400bhp V8 hard top only Z4M would be a "gay" car, and yet somehow an X6M isn't. Firstly, this is supposed to be a forum for petrolheads, and we've got someone like you saying that a 400bhp driver-focused rear drive coupé is "gay", and a big off roader is "not gay". That's the opinion of a 16 year old girl, and you're entitled to it, but please don't start insulting people if they disagree with you.
Edited by RobM77 on Sunday 10th January 14:25
RobM77 said:
robsti said:
RobM77 said:
robsti said:
RobM77 said:
robsti said:
Zod said:
robsti said:
Zod said:
Don't be ridiculous, robski. The M5/M6 and M3 have completely bespoke Motorsport engines for the first time in M GmbH's history. They are obviously true M cars.
The engines yes!but when did you last see a motorspot car with all the seats, leather, electric everything, satnav ,cd changer but with some carbon trim to save weight!Edited by robsti on Wednesday 30th December 22:48
And what the fk is the problem with satnav? It weighs two kg! The GT3 has satnav too.
Your other comment confused me too: since when did performance mean a car wasn't designed for the road, and comforts make it more suitable for the road?!! Most performance road cars are not designed with the track or racing in mind (everything from the NSX to the Mclaren F1 - none were designed with racing in mind at all), they were designed as performance road cars that are pleasing to drive for people like us, just like a BMW M car is nowadays. I understand that the days of M cars produced for homologation are over, but they're still performance cars! The very notion of a performance road car with four wheel drive, a near 2 tonne kerb weight and a whole load of ground clearance is just wrong. I saw an X6M yesterday (I work opposite a large BMW office) and yes, it's a bonkers thing and I'm glad cars like that exist these days, but it should not be produced before and in preference to a Z4M and a 1 series M; those cars have low CofGs and are smaller, and therefore have a more natural inclination to performance. BMW spending money on producing a "motorsport" version of the X5 is just ridiculous when they're not doing the same of their sports cars like the Z4. If you want comfort first and performance second, I'd reccomend you buy a car like the 645i (funny that!). If you're a driving enthusiast who wants comfort for everyday use then an M car would be suitable.
Edited by RobM77 on Saturday 9th January 14:24
Edited by robsti on Sunday 10th January 14:04
We started this because you stated that a 400bhp V8 hard top only Z4M would be a "gay" car, and yet somehow an X6M isn't. Firstly, this is supposed to be a forum for petrolheads, and we've got someone like you saying that a 400bhp driver-focused rear drive coupé is "gay", and a big off roader is "not gay". That's the opinion of a 16 year old girl, and you're entitled to it, but please don't start insulting people if they disagree with you.
Edited by RobM77 on Sunday 10th January 14:25
Edited by robsti on Sunday 10th January 15:10
Lost soul said:
Robert060379 said:
"However much you polish a turd it's still a turd".
How original ,, thanks for your input Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff