RE: Bugatti Saloon Back In Black

RE: Bugatti Saloon Back In Black

Author
Discussion

G0ldfysh

3,304 posts

258 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
Not a saloon, it's a frickin' hatchback FFS.

lionrampant

577 posts

191 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
I preferred it in the two-tone Blue/Chrome-silver paint combo. This is still fairly nice though.

stew-S160

8,006 posts

239 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
10JH said:
Why are there no photos of the front of it?
they crashed it too many times into the ugly wall...

Supersonic7

38 posts

179 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
I really like that, exquisite even!

Regards

Supersonic

Wooderson

412 posts

224 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
In profile at least, I'm thinking A6 Avant...

davepoth

29,395 posts

200 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
Really does look an awful lot like an Insignia. Much better way of spending a million than a veyron though.

Balmoral Green

40,961 posts

249 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
If VAG had bought Tatra.

vintageracer01

873 posts

176 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
dinkel said:
marcosgt said:
Not having a million quid to spare I'm not really core target audience, but it looks a lot better than a Maybach to me...

M.
Maybach has almost gone now . . .

Autoblog.com says: "If a recent report out of the UK is to be believed, Maybach is set to get the axe in the very near future. However, as a last hurrah, all three models from the ultra-luxury division of Mercedes-Benz (57, 62 and Landaulet) will receive facelifts this year. The last round of top-zoot Maybachs will debut in late April at the Beijing Motor Show. Expect the changes to the lineup to be very minor – new grilles and LED lights should be about the only differences from the sedans currently on sale."

. . . so there's room for a luxo barge like this Bug.
The Maybach seem to have the problem to look just like a larger S-Class Mercedes with some mainstream interior design. I think, the Maybach failed to be "special".

The Bugatti, however, has a very distinctive appearance and it looks like the interior is exquisitely designed. And the proportions are certainly closer to a RR Phantom than a Panamera. There is a 16 cyl.-engine under the bonnet!

I like this approach a lot.

But whether it is worth 2.5 times the price of a Phantom, I am not so sure.

Caviar

209 posts

207 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
classy. detailing is superb although front headlights destroys. can't they just run a supercharged straight 8? it would justify the price if they did.

cool

Garlick

40,601 posts

241 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
I like it, very much in fact. Can't wait to see it.

BSC

341 posts

283 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
IMHO it's a piece of automotive art. Imagine a continental tour crossing the Galibier pass in style. Classy!

Urban Sports

11,321 posts

204 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
davepoth said:
Really does look an awful lot like an Insignia. Much better way of spending a million than a veyron though.
Complement for the Insignia, which IMO is a good looking car compared to the alternatives.

thumbup

Anyway, the Bugatti looks fantastic IMO, wait for the first spotted on here hehe

Question for all of the people that don't like it, what are these super saloons supposed to look like, I'm genuinely interested!?


Dick_Phallus

1,155 posts

185 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
Bi-Quad exhausts! Awful...

willE36

447 posts

180 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
[quote=vintageracer01The Bugatti, however, has a very distinctive appearance and it looks like the interior is exquisitely designed. And the proportions are certainly closer to a RR Phantom than a Panamera. There is a 16 cyl.-engine under the bonnet!

I like this approach a lot.

But whether it is worth 2.5 times the price of a Phantom, I am not so sure.

[/quote]

Closer to a Phantom? It wipes the floor with the Phantom!! Looks better in two-tone, and the lights on the wheels could get the axe in my book. Not a fan of the double quad exhausts, despite their homage to the Type 57SC Atlantic. The interior though.... pure sex = )

jd5

81 posts

214 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
10JH said:
Why are there no photos of the front of it?
Because the front is even more horrendous looking than the sides, back or roof !!

I think they missed a gig not offering it in 1975 British Leyland sh11tty brown or maroon.

jd5

81 posts

214 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all




>> "the lights on the wheels could get the axe in my book"

I think you will find the whole lot gets the axe. At this price and in this unique sector of the market, a car has to be very, very special indeed to make it through. The Veyron was that however, this most certainly is not.






willE36 said:
[quote=vintageracer01The Bugatti, however, has a very distinctive appearance and it looks like the interior is exquisitely designed. And the proportions are certainly closer to a RR Phantom than a Panamera. There is a 16 cyl.-engine under the bonnet!

I like this approach a lot.

But whether it is worth 2.5 times the price of a Phantom, I am not so sure.
Closer to a Phantom? It wipes the floor with the Phantom!! Looks better in two-tone, and the lights on the wheels could get the axe in my book. Not a fan of the double quad exhausts, despite their homage to the Type 57SC Atlantic. The interior though.... pure sex = )

jd5

81 posts

214 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
BSC said:
IMHO it's a piece of automotive art. Imagine a continental tour crossing the Galibier pass in style. Classy!
If you are talking Automotive Turner prize then maybe.. remember a couple of years ago when the jobby in a display casket won? smile

Ceylon

374 posts

173 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
Stonking car. Some very strange comments on here more suited to a site dedicated to clothes than cars.

Herbs

4,916 posts

230 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
Sorry don't like that at all.

peterattheboro

1,362 posts

184 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
Is there any need for that many exhaust pipes?