RE: Limping Cat: Dying XJ220 Spotted

RE: Limping Cat: Dying XJ220 Spotted

Author
Discussion

FOURRONE

526 posts

180 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
A job for Chip Foose and the overhaulin team

ivantate

166 posts

169 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
Erich Stahler said:
JonRB said:
louismchuge said:
It looks like a building nearby has colapsed or something? It could have been clean and loved a day or so earlier!
Quite.

I had some tradesman or delivery driver tell me that I didn't "deserve" my Chimaera because it was covered with leaves and looked dirty, and I obviously didn't look after it enough (cheeky bd). I'd only cleaned it two days before but it was autumn and we'd also had that dirty rain that has loads of sand and dirt in it.

Never underestimate just how quickly a car can get dirty.
Its a dust covered car in a very dusty desert car park near a building site, for all we know it may well get regular use, the owner just has better things to do than stand there with a bar of detailing clay FFS!
Take a look at the grime on the car, it has been outside for a long time. Also the fact the side of the car is all pushed in and one of the wing mirrors is hanging off shows there isnt alot of care or attention spent on it.

Suppose this can all be explained away with it spending a day in a desert.


Hope the car returns to its former glory, nice to see these cars being used but not left to decay into this condition.

jp-speed-triple

1,504 posts

188 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
it'll buff.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
havoc said:
williamp said:
Why is the XJ220 so unloved??

Its still a 217mph car- the third fastest production car ever. Only the Mclaren F1 and Veyron are quicker.

I always get the impression that if it had anything other then a Jaguar badge on it, it would be reverred as the car it is.
Mainly the fact that it was advertised with a V12 then sold with a V6 twin-turbo (worse...derived from the Metro 6R4 engine!).

That and brakes like blocks of wood...even from an era where braking wasn't as effortless as today!
Ah, the keyboard motoring journalist, I really don't know how mags like Evo, etc stay in business these days with so many 'experts' about. smile

TimmmyT

49 posts

172 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
Phil,

You seem to be contradicting your self quite a bit here. In you're earlier posts your saying 'It's not all that bad...I am flying in to see the car in a couple of days and will post an update up on my site.

The pics are taken just after the car arrived at the workshop in the Industrial area and is not representative of where it has been all this time.'

Then later you state 'It has been left outside for a long long time....the reason it has been brought in for work is the fuel pump has given up the ghost. The damage to the honeycombe bodywork is also massive...if you look closely on the offside you will see some of it.'

Just curious as to your involvement in this car and the story. Not having a pop just want to know more about the story.

markcoznottz

7,155 posts

225 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
St John Smythe said:
havoc said:
williamp said:
Why is the XJ220 so unloved??

Its still a 217mph car- the third fastest production car ever. Only the Mclaren F1 and Veyron are quicker.

I always get the impression that if it had anything other then a Jaguar badge on it, it would be reverred as the car it is.
Mainly the fact that it was advertised with a V12 then sold with a V6 twin-turbo (worse...derived from the Metro 6R4 engine!).

That and brakes like blocks of wood...even from an era where braking wasn't as effortless as today!
Ah, the keyboard motoring journalist, I really don't know how mags like Evo, etc stay in business these days with so many 'experts' about. smile
What he said is right, it should have had a V12, but the V6 certainly did the numbers, although the nardo top speed should be taken with a pinch of salt as they removed the cats. Oh and the brakes were/are rubbish, no servo assistance, not up to the job simple as.

djchocice

26 posts

173 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
Absolutely awful how such a beautiful car can be left to die, the XJ220 is my favourite super car along side the Ferrari F40 and Mclaren F1. Wonder how much it would cost to save it?
I would gladly take out a mortgage to see it back to good health if that was possible.

easter

2,366 posts

193 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
very daily mail indeed , shock and anger grrrrrrr

i have some loverly pics of a blue 993 turbo i saw in dubai in a similiar condition if u would like to see .

a

G4HKS

2,673 posts

220 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
Justayellowbadge said:
I had no idea 'dirty' and 'dying' were synonymous.

Sorry guys, but what a stupid story.
+1

Come on chaps, you can do better than that. Or is this the Sun?

Smartass

177 posts

193 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
It could have been caught outside in a dust storm, just just never know. I once saw the front spoiler on a brand new Camry get stripped back to bare plastic on the 400km from Bahrain to Riyadh in a light dust storm. The driver had coated most of the front of the car in Fairy liquid (a local trick - it dries to a protective crust and petrol stations sell it by the case) but missed the bottom two inches and that was the result. I've also seen Riyadh after a serious dust storm and all the cars looked like that XJ

poo at Paul's

14,153 posts

176 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
You just forget how utterly awesome looking they were/are!

nadirv8

139 posts

216 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
BUG4LIFE said:
That is a sad sad group of pics - in the same way I get sad when those dicks on Top Gear wreak a car, no matter what it is [breaking caravan's is fine though]!
+1

havoc

30,086 posts

236 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
St John Smythe said:
havoc said:
williamp said:
Why is the XJ220 so unloved??

Its still a 217mph car- the third fastest production car ever. Only the Mclaren F1 and Veyron are quicker.

I always get the impression that if it had anything other then a Jaguar badge on it, it would be reverred as the car it is.
Mainly the fact that it was advertised with a V12 then sold with a V6 twin-turbo (worse...derived from the Metro 6R4 engine!).

That and brakes like blocks of wood...even from an era where braking wasn't as effortless as today!
Ah, the keyboard motoring journalist, I really don't know how mags like Evo, etc stay in business these days with so many 'experts' about. smile
I'm quoting what's been repeatedly written about it. Should I quote the provenance of every post I make, or just ones you're likely to carp about?!?

Anyway, do you have anything useful to say, or are you just going to snipe at others?

RSPhilip

252 posts

208 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
From what we know the car has been left forlorn by the current owner at his/her property in Qatar..we believe...as it has been in Beirut and Syria in the last 6 years.

The car was brought in due to a fuel pump failure and was shot outside the workshop in the Industrial quarter in Doha. It is a bit of hole hence the rough looking street scene.

Mechanically the car is believed to be ok...believed being the operative word here! In terms of bodywork there are some nasty dents on the rear quarter and door...and also damage underneath indicating it has been dropped on a four post lift at some stage.

updates to come soon...

LC926

891 posts

173 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
You can see it's not just dusty, just look at all the dents. All along the O/S rear quarter and also under the O/S headlight.

chunkymonkey71

13,015 posts

199 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
Justayellowbadge said:
I had no idea 'dirty' and 'dying' were synonymous.

Sorry guys, but what a stupid story.
I hope not. Dirty girls woudn't be nearly as much fun!

JonRB

74,611 posts

273 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
Erich Stahler said:
JonRB said:
louismchuge said:
It looks like a building nearby has colapsed or something? It could have been clean and loved a day or so earlier!
Quite.

I had some tradesman or delivery driver tell me that I didn't "deserve" my Chimaera because it was covered with leaves and looked dirty, and I obviously didn't look after it enough (cheeky bd). I'd only cleaned it two days before but it was autumn and we'd also had that dirty rain that has loads of sand and dirt in it.

Never underestimate just how quickly a car can get dirty.
Its a dust covered car in a very dusty desert car park near a building site, for all we know it may well get regular use, the owner just has better things to do than stand there with a bar of detailing clay FFS!
How is it possible for you to make a post that sounds like you are disagreeing whilst at the same time saying things that are in agreement with the two posts you're quoting? confused

Basil Brush

5,088 posts

264 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
markcoznottz said:
St John Smythe said:
havoc said:
williamp said:
Why is the XJ220 so unloved??

Its still a 217mph car- the third fastest production car ever. Only the Mclaren F1 and Veyron are quicker.

I always get the impression that if it had anything other then a Jaguar badge on it, it would be reverred as the car it is.
Mainly the fact that it was advertised with a V12 then sold with a V6 twin-turbo (worse...derived from the Metro 6R4 engine!).

That and brakes like blocks of wood...even from an era where braking wasn't as effortless as today!
Ah, the keyboard motoring journalist, I really don't know how mags like Evo, etc stay in business these days with so many 'experts' about. smile
What he said is right, it should have had a V12, but the V6 certainly did the numbers, although the nardo top speed should be taken with a pinch of salt as they removed the cats. Oh and the brakes were/are rubbish, no servo assistance, not up to the job simple as.
The 1980s Ford Escort dash and switch gear is my favourite part. smile

B10

1,240 posts

268 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
Nothing wrong with the Metro 6R4 engine. Very fine engine, either for rallying, in the MG Metro 6R4 or at le Mans in the Jaguars. And no it was NOT a Rover V8 with 2 cylinders lopped off.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 6th April 2010
quotequote all
I am sure a bit of t-cut will get it back to new..

At least the sand might have made it into the engine, to port and polish it...