RE: PH Heroes: Audi Quattro
Discussion
r11co said:
Mermaid said:
The very man!Straff99 said:
I think you're missing an important point here. The Audi Quattro is the car that ruined rallying forever. They sounded great but that's all. Four wheel drive is the equivalent of steroids in athletics; they merely lifted the bar until everyone else caught up. They didn't make the sport more exciting, quite the opposite. Check out the British Rally Championship. I went on the Bulldog rally a few weeks ago and, when the best of the Historics had been through, the spectators started to leave before the BRC arrived!! How's that for progress? Big, overweight, ill handling lumps of lard; that's why the Peugeot T16 blew them into the weeds.
You're not comparing like with like.The T16 was much faster because it was a mid-engined, purpose-built, spaceframe chassis. The Quattro was a modified road car, initially built for Group 4 regulations, which never properly fitted into Group B against the specials like the RS200, T16 and S4. Even the S1 still had road car lineage because Audi saw rally cars as upgraded road cars.
Now to your point about them ruining the sport. How much longer do you think it would have been before some bright spark came up with the same idea if Audi hadn't done it? The era of Mk2 Escorts and Chevettes wasn't going to last forever - things move on. Rallying technology had barely changed for a decade and it was time for the next big step. Blame FISA for not closing the 4WD loophole after Audi enquired about it.
I'm surprised by your comments regarding its handling. Which version of the rally car did you drive or engineer? I ask because surely only an uninformed idiot would make a comment about the handling without direct experience.
Ahonen said:
Straff99 said:
I think you're missing an important point here. The Audi Quattro is the car that ruined rallying forever. They sounded great but that's all. Four wheel drive is the equivalent of steroids in athletics; they merely lifted the bar until everyone else caught up. They didn't make the sport more exciting, quite the opposite. Check out the British Rally Championship. I went on the Bulldog rally a few weeks ago and, when the best of the Historics had been through, the spectators started to leave before the BRC arrived!! How's that for progress? Big, overweight, ill handling lumps of lard; that's why the Peugeot T16 blew them into the weeds.
You're not comparing like with like.The T16 was much faster because it was a mid-engined, purpose-built, spaceframe chassis. The Quattro was a modified road car, initially built for Group 4 regulations, which never properly fitted into Group B against the specials like the RS200, T16 and S4. Even the S1 still had road car lineage because Audi saw rally cars as upgraded road cars.
Now to your point about them ruining the sport. How much longer do you think it would have been before some bright spark came up with the same idea if Audi hadn't done it? The era of Mk2 Escorts and Chevettes wasn't going to last forever - things move on. Rallying technology had barely changed for a decade and it was time for the next big step. Blame FISA for not closing the 4WD loophole after Audi enquired about it.
I'm surprised by your comments regarding its handling. Which version of the rally car did you drive or engineer? I ask because surely only an uninformed idiot would make a comment about the handling without direct experience.
Whether we should still have 4WD rally crs now is anotherq uestion, but you can't deny the quattros place in car history.
Ahonen said:
Straff99 said:
I think you're missing an important point here. The Audi Quattro is the car that ruined rallying forever. They sounded great but that's all. Four wheel drive is the equivalent of steroids in athletics; they merely lifted the bar until everyone else caught up. They didn't make the sport more exciting, quite the opposite. Check out the British Rally Championship. I went on the Bulldog rally a few weeks ago and, when the best of the Historics had been through, the spectators started to leave before the BRC arrived!! How's that for progress? Big, overweight, ill handling lumps of lard; that's why the Peugeot T16 blew them into the weeds.
You're not comparing like with like.The T16 was much faster because it was a mid-engined, purpose-built, spaceframe chassis. The Quattro was a modified road car, initially built for Group 4 regulations, which never properly fitted into Group B against the specials like the RS200, T16 and S4. Even the S1 still had road car lineage because Audi saw rally cars as upgraded road cars.
Now to your point about them ruining the sport. How much longer do you think it would have been before some bright spark came up with the same idea if Audi hadn't done it? The era of Mk2 Escorts and Chevettes wasn't going to last forever - things move on. Rallying technology had barely changed for a decade and it was time for the next big step. Blame FISA for not closing the 4WD loophole after Audi enquired about it.
I'm surprised by your comments regarding its handling. Which version of the rally car did you drive or engineer? I ask because surely only an uninformed idiot would make a comment about the handling without direct experience.
Numerous cars we all love and admire today have 4WD or AWD as some companys may call it, and all these cars wouldn't be quite as far along if Audi didn't have the innovation to produce a 4WD road car, Vorsprung durch Technik as it is said by the geniuses! The introduction of 4WD revolutionised the auto world we live in today.
Not to mention the fact that the S1 Quattro developed for pikes peak managed to destroy records on it's first trip up, and then again on it's second and third!
TheStig89 said:
Not to mention the fact that the S1 Quattro developed for pikes peak managed to destroy records on it's first trip up, and then again on it's second and third!
What really upset the Americans in '84 was that this funny looking German car had turned up (without a V8...), driven by a French woman and soundly beaten all the locals with their years of experience and specially built cars.Great days.
Turbobanana said:
dapprman said:
Turbobanana said:
It was a lower case "q" in quattro, wasn't it?
Not on the rally cars and their homologation road cars, only where it was the 4x4 equivalent to one of their 'regular' cars.http://www.quattroownersclub.com/
I know for certain the rally/homolagation version was spelled with the opposite case of Q from the regular production cars.
Ahonen said:
TheStig89 said:
Not to mention the fact that the S1 Quattro developed for pikes peak managed to destroy records on it's first trip up, and then again on it's second and third!
What really upset the Americans in '84 was that this funny looking German car had turned up (without a V8...), driven by a French woman and soundly beaten all the locals with their years of experience and specially built cars.Great days.
One day I will have one. They deserve to be PH heroes on their engine sound alone! To say it made an impression on a young boy in a North Yorkshire forest in a dark winter's night is probably a slight understatement.
Not only was it an Englishman that designed it, but a Yorkshireman too... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Smith_%28desig...
If only Audi were to realise what a styling grammar they own, and dump this one-shape-fits-all goatee beard look that they are obsessed with.
Not only was it an Englishman that designed it, but a Yorkshireman too... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Smith_%28desig...
If only Audi were to realise what a styling grammar they own, and dump this one-shape-fits-all goatee beard look that they are obsessed with.
SJobson said:
Oops - that's a Coupe, not an Ur-quattro.
Love the Fuchs forged alloys; why were they so rare on the UK cars?
Edited by SJobson on Tuesday 6th April 19:51
Had one years ago, brought it second hand and was told it was the 3rd one imported into the UK.
Don't know if that was true but it was LHD and had a MPH speedo.
What I do know is that it was a fantastic car!
You had to adapt your driving style to allow for the turbo lag - get onto the throttle as you enter the corner so the power comes on as you are in the corner/exiting it - once you got used to that it would just grip and go round corners at silly speeds.
Get on the throttle late and it would understeer but not that badly if I remember correctly.
Get on the throttle a touch to early and it would oversteer, controllable and very nice!
When getting parts from the dealer I got used to asking for coupe parts not quatrro parts - there was a difference in price!
I only sold it because I knew that one day I would have an accident and due to the speed it was capable of it would be a big accident.
Still wish I'd not been so sensible!
Don't know if that was true but it was LHD and had a MPH speedo.
What I do know is that it was a fantastic car!
You had to adapt your driving style to allow for the turbo lag - get onto the throttle as you enter the corner so the power comes on as you are in the corner/exiting it - once you got used to that it would just grip and go round corners at silly speeds.
Get on the throttle late and it would understeer but not that badly if I remember correctly.
Get on the throttle a touch to early and it would oversteer, controllable and very nice!
When getting parts from the dealer I got used to asking for coupe parts not quatrro parts - there was a difference in price!
I only sold it because I knew that one day I would have an accident and due to the speed it was capable of it would be a big accident.
Still wish I'd not been so sensible!
One of these showed up in my neighborhood back when I had a paper route. It was neat, but it didn't get the reverence that the author indicates, at least not from me or my friends or anyone I know.
The 70 GTO? yes. The new 84 Vette? yes. The 65 fastback mustang? yes The new Quattro? no
The 70 GTO? yes. The new 84 Vette? yes. The 65 fastback mustang? yes The new Quattro? no
Edited by mikEsprit on Tuesday 13th April 00:31
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff